All Posts (12237)
http://worldtruth.tv/over-700000-people-on-us-watch-list-once-you-get-on-theres-no-way-off-2/
http://www.zengardner.com/new-brain-tech-reveals-past-thoughts-memories/
This is an excerpt from the article;
Three Ps
One of the most difficult aspects of change is the need to make a day-to-day, hour-to-hour, and minute-to-minute commitment to change (Every time you miss an opportunity for change, you further ingrain your old obstacles). A helpful reminder of this necessity is what I call the Three Ps.
The first P, patience, is a constant reminder that change takes time and that if you maintain your commitment, you have a good chance to make the changes you want long lasting.
The second P, persistence, means you must keep vigilant and, as the saying goes, "keep on keeping on" in your journey to change.
The third P, perseverance, refers to your ability to overcome setbacks and maintain your motivation and confidence in the face of periodic failures and disappointment
ersonal Growth: Five Steps to Positive Life Change (And the Big Payoff!)
In my first post in this exploration of how we can produce meaningful and last life change, I described the four obstacles that prevent change. In my last post on this topic, I introduced you to the five building blocks of change. These steps I just described set the stage for change, but the real work lies ahead. Change can be scary, tiring, frustrating, and repetitious. And change takes time. How much?, you might ask. It depends on your ability to remove the four obstacles to change and embrace the five building blocks I discussed above. It also relies on your ability to commit to the minute-to-minute process of change. But I have found that when someone makes a deep commitment to change, they can expect to see a positive shift in 3-6 months.
With the foundation for positive life change now in place, it's time to take action. Here are the five steps you must take to turn possibility and hope into real change.
Find a Therapist
Search for a mental health professional near you.
Explore Your Inner World
Perhaps the most difficult part of changing your life involves exploring your inner world. True change cannot just occur on the surface or outside of you. Change means not only understanding who you are, but also why you are who you are, in other words, what makes you tick. The first step you must take is to identify the obstacles that are preventing you from changing. You need to "look in the mirror" and specify what the baggage, habits, emotions, and environment are that are keeping you from yourgoals. Understanding these obstacles takes the mystery out of who you are and what has been holding you back. It also gives you clarity on what you need to change and gives you an initial direction in your path of change.
These explorations of your inner world can enable you to finally understand why you have been the way you have been and done things you have done even when neither have worked for you ("So that's why I've been this way all of my life!"). This process will also help you to remove the obstacles that have stood in your path to change. These insights also, at a deep level, liberate you to move from your current path to another that will take you where you really want to go. Most importantly, truly understanding your inner world will allow you to finally put the past behind you-when most of your life you have been putting your past in front of you.
Change Goals
Once the path to your goals has been cleared, you still need to have a clear idea about your final destination. Think of its like GPS; you can't get directions unless you input where you want to go.
When you establish clear objectives of the changes you want to make, you are able to better focus your efforts and direct your energy toward those changes. These goals should identify what areas you want to change, how you will change them, and the ultimate outcome you want to achieve. Moreover, the goals should be specific, objective, and time defined.
Action Steps
So far, everything you have done to change has been talk. Now it's time to actually make change happen. Action steps describe the particular actions you will take to achieve your change goals. They may range from adhering to an exercise regimen to maintaining emotional control in a crisis situation to staying focused when surrounded by distractions. Action steps give you the specific tools you need to act on the world in the present and to give you alternative actions that counter your old baggage, habits, emotions, and environment.
Forks in the Road
Taking the action steps and achieving your change goals depends on recognizing important forks in the road. I make the distinction between the bad road and the good road (there can actually be multiple bad and good roads, but let's keep things simple). The bad road is the one that you've been on for so long driven by the four obstacles I described above; it's a "feel bad, do bad" road. In contrast, the good road is the one you want to be on; it's a "feel good, do good" road.
This fork in the road is simple, but not easy. It's simple because you would, of course, want to be on the good road. It's not easy because you have years of baggage, habits, emotions, and environment continuing to propel you down the bad road.
A key to the change process involves recognizing the forks in the road when they appear because without seeing the forks in the road, you obviously can't take the good road, that is, makes positive changes. This awareness isn't as easy as it seems because all those years of obstacles has created a myopia that can limit your field of vision causing you to miss the forks when you come upon them.
In all likelihood, you will initially only recognize the forks when you are long past them ("Darn it, I wish I had seen that fork earlier!"). But, with time and vigilance, you will see those forks earlier and earlier until one day an amazing thing will happen; you will see the fork when you arrive at it.
Unfortunately, because of the Sirens' call of the four obstacles, you will still probably take the bad road at first. But, one day, another amazing thing will happen. You will recognize that fork in the road as you approach it and, yes, you will take it! And you will never be the same person again.
Don't get me wrong; you don't have it made yet. You'll have setbacks and struggles because you will still go down the bad road sometimes; those obstacles take time to dismantle. But every time you take the good road, you'll see what a great road it is to be on and it will encourage you to continue to resist your baggage, habits, emotions, and environment and to take the good road at the many forks that lay ahead.
Three Ps
One of the most difficult aspects of change is the need to make a day-to-day, hour-to-hour, and minute-to-minute commitment to change (Every time you miss an opportunity for change, you further ingrain your old obstacles). A helpful reminder of this necessity is what I call the Three Ps.
The first P, patience, is a constant reminder that change takes time and that if you maintain your commitment, you have a good chance to make the changes you want long lasting.
The second P, persistence, means you must keep vigilant and, as the saying goes, "keep on keeping on" in your journey to change.
The third P, perseverance, refers to your ability to overcome setbacks and maintain your motivation and confidence in the face of periodic failures and disappointment.
The Payoff
There is an immense payoff for your commitment and efforts at change: A life-altering shift in who you are and how you think, feel, and behave. A new direction that your life will take. And finally moving toward achieving your life goals. As a former client told me so poignantly: "I realized that I would never have to go back to the way I used to live my life, and I have never been so happy!
I WONDER HOW MANY T.I.'S ARE MURDERED FOR LIFE OR CANCER INSURANCE POLICES THAT MAY HAVE BEEN BOUGHT ILLEGALLY ON THEM BUY THEIR DIRECT ENERGY WEAPON ATTACKS,MURDERS,SERIAL KILLERS, WHAT EVER YOU WANT TO LABEL THEM AS. I THINK THE PEOPLE THAT ATTACK MY POSSIBLE MAY HAVE SOME ILLEGAL INSURANCE RACKET GOING ON. IS THERE ANY WAY TO STOP THIS COLLECTION,IF HAPPENING? WE NEED A MOVEMENT WITH TO STOP THEM FROM THIS.ANYBODY AGREE? GOT A GOOD IDEA,POST IT.
SCOTT FULBRIGHT
FREEDOM FIGHTERS FOR AMERICA
"FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY" http://www.freedomfightersforamerica.com ;
here is a camera i found, bought one and it seems pretty straightforward. it's cheap and the shipping is free from this site. here it is http://www.dx.com/p/ultra-mini-screen-free-3-0-mega-pixels-cmos-motion-detection-video-camera-micro-sd-tf-slot-37478#.VCh5OaU9l0s
Theses are small and i mean small. no lcd screen to take up space, point and shoot.
I think their neat lol.
I hope this helps some people catch them in the act.
I have had the most amazing privelage of meeting online, the worlds first fully lobotomized, upper percentage mensa member, right here on peacepink! !!
First, let me post some things about a lobotomy. Heres a few paragraphs from wkipedia:
The lobotomy procedure could have severe negative effects on a patient's personality and ability to function independently.[131] Lobotomy patients often show a marked reduction in initiative and inhibition.[132] They may also exhibit difficulty putting themselves in the position of others because of decreased cognition and detachment from society.[133]
Immediately following surgery patients were often stuporous, confused, and incontinent. Some developed an enormous appetite and gained considerable weight. Seizures were another common complication of surgery. Emphasis was put on the training of patients in the weeks and months following surgery.[134]
(Youll notice this next paragraph and how it points out the childish personality that a lobotomy creates in the patient)
Freeman coined the term "surgically induced childhood" and used it constantly to refer the results of lobotomy. The operation left people with an "infantile personality"; a period of maturation would then, according to Freeman, lead to recovery. In an unpublished memoir he described how the "personality of the patient was changed in some way in the hope of rendering him more amenable to the social pressures under which he is supposed to exist." He described one 29 year old woman as being, following lobotomy, a "smiling, lazy and satisfactory patient with the personality of an oyster" who couldn't remember Freeman's name and endlessly poured coffee from an empty pot. When her parents had difficulty dealing with her behaviour, Freeman advised a system of rewards (ice-cream) and punishment (smacks)
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobotomy
Interesting isnt it. Now lets look at what mensa is:
Membership requirementEdit
Mensa's requirement for membership is a score at or above the 98th percentile on certain standardised IQ or other approved intelligence tests, such as the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales. The minimum accepted score on the Stanford-Binet is 132, while for the Cattell it is 148.[11] Most IQ tests are designed to yield a mean score of 100 with a standard deviation of 15; the 98th-percentile score under these conditions is 131.
Mensa also has its own application exam, and some national groups offer alternative batteries of tests. These exams are proctored by Mensa and do not provide a quantified score; they serve only to qualify a person for membership. In some national groups, a person may take a Mensa offered test only once, although one may later submit an application with results from a different qualifying test.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensa_International
When you look at the side effects of a lobotomy, then compare that to the level of intelligence needed to be upper level mensa, you can truly see why we have a miracle in our midst!!! Yes, the first lobotomized upper percentage mensa member in the world! !! And hes right here on peacepink! !!
Heres a quote from our hero here:
"and the injury that sent me to the ottawa riverside hospital, which did not accept emergency cases btw, for the illegal and unnecessary lobotomy (for a "broken cheekbone"?!), was no accident,"
Heres another:
"but perhaps she was 'treated' at the same kind of facility that did my stealth lobotomy or 'fixed' my brother "
Sad isnt it?? A forced lobotomy! !
But, dont fear! Hes ok, in fact hes so well after such a horror, tgat he is now upper percentage mensa!!! Heres a quote from our hero:
"with my 'brain damage' i scored a 99 percentile in verbal reasoning aptitude (they don't award 100) and am in the upper percentages of mensa" https://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=2351430%3ABlogPost%3A519718&commentId=2351430%3AComment%3A519981
This is a historical first friends!!!! Never before has Anyone Ever overcome a lobotomy to become a upper percentage mensa!! His name????
Mike LeBerge, better known as LaBrat! !! When you see hes online, you shoukd ask him about how he maintains upper percentage mensa while dealing dealing with such serious brain damage. I mean, as you get to know him, his symptoms are apperant. He cant use punctuation or capitolization, and he gets fits where he calls names and such. But, usually, hes a nice guy. Just dont disagree with his gangstalking theory, he will call you a perp troll.
Anyway, its a first, so enjoy it!
"Whenever I talk about the future of AGI, someone starts talking about the possibility that AGI will “take over the world.”
One question is whether this would be a good or bad thing — and the answer to that is, of course, “it depends” … I’ll come back to that at the end of this post.Another relevant question is: If this were going to happen, how would it most likely come about. How would an “AGI takeover” be likely to unfold, in practice?One option is what Eliezer Yudkowsky has called AI “FOOM” … i.e. a “Hard Takeoff” (a possibility which I analyzed a bit , some time ago…)
Richard Loosemore and I have argued that an Intelligence Explosion is probable. But this doesn’t mean a Hard Takeoff is probable.
What often seems to happen in discussions of the future of AI (among hardcore futurist geeks, anyway) is something like:
- Someone presents the Foom / Hard Takeoff idea as a scary, and reasonably likely, option
- Someone else points out that this is pretty unlikely, since someone watching the subhuman-level AGI system in question would probably notice if the AGI system were ordering a lot of new hardware for itself, or undertaking unusual network activity, or displaying highly novel RAM usage patterns, or whatever…
In spite of being a huge optimist about the power and future of AGI, I actually tend to agree with the anti-Foom arguments. A hard AGI takeoff in 5 minutes seems pretty unlikely to me.
What I think is far more likely is an Intelligence Explosion manifested as a “semi-hard takeoff” — where an AGI takes a few years to get from slightly subhuman level general intelligence to massively superhuman intelligence, and involved various human beings, systems and institutions in the process.
Human society is complex and disorganized enough, and human motivations are complex and confused enough, and human judgment is erratic enough, that there would be plenty of opportunities for an early-stage AGI agent to embed itself in human society in such a way as to foster the simultaneous growth of its power and intelligence over a period of a few years. In fact an early-stage AGI probably won’t even need to TRY for this to happen — once early-stage AGI systems can do really useful stuff, various governments, companies and other organizations will push pretty hard to use these systems as thoroughly as they can, because of the economic efficiency and scientific and media status this will bring.
Once an AGI is at human level and embedded in human society in judicious ways, it’s going to be infeasible for anyone to get rid of it — and it’s going to keep on growing in intelligence and power, aided by the human institutions it’s linked with. Consider, e.g., a future in which:
- Azerbaijan’s leaders get bought off by a wildly successful AGI futures trader, and the nation becomes an AGI stronghold, complete with a nuclear arsenal and what-not (maybe the AGI has helped the country design and build nukes, or maybe it didn’t need the AGI for that…).
- The nation the AGI has bought is not aggressive, not attacking anyone — it’s just sitting there using tech to raise itself out of poverty … doing profitable deals on the financial markets, making and selling software products/services, patenting inventions, … and creating a military apparatus for self-defense, like basically every other country.
What happens then? The AGI keeps profiting and self-improving at its own pace, is what happens? Is the US really gonna nuke a peaceful country just for being smart and getting rich, and risk massive retaliation and World War III? I doubt it…. In its comfy Azerbaijani stronghold, the AGI can then develop from human-level to massively transhuman intelligence — and then a lot of things become possible…
I have spun out one scenario here but of course there are lots of others. Let’s not allow the unrealism of the “hard takeoff in 5 minutes and the AGI takes over the world” aka “foom” scenario to blind our minds to the great variety of other possibilities…. Bear in mind that an AGI going from toddler-level to human-level in 5 years, and human-level to superhuman level in 5 more years, is a FOOM on the time-scale of human history, even if not as sudden as a 5 minute hard takeoff on the time-scale of an individual human life…
So how could we stop a semihard takeoff from happening? We can’t really — not without some sort of 1984++ style fascist anti-AI world dictatorship, or a war destroying modern society projecting us back before the information age. And anyway, I am not in favor of throttling AGI development personally; I doubt the hypothetical Azerbaijanian AGI would particularly want to annihilate humanity and I suspect transhuman AGIs will do more good than harm, on average over all possible worlds…. I’m not at all sure that “an AGI taking over the world” — with the fully or partly witting support of some group(s) of humans — would be a bad thing, compared to other viable alternatives for humanity’s future….
In terms of risks to humanity, this more realistic “semihard takeoff” development scenario highlights where the really onerous risks probably are. SIAI/MIRI and the Future of Humanity Institute seem to spend a lot of energy thinking about the risk of a superhuman AGI annihilating humanity for its own reasons; but it seems to me a much more palpable and probable risk will occur at the stage where an AGI is around human-level but not yet dramatically more powerful and intelligent than humans, so that it still needs cooperation from human beings to get things done. This stage of development will create a situation in which AGI systems will want to strike bargains with humans, wherein they do some things that certain humans want, in order to get some things that they want…
But obviously, some of the things that some humans want, are highly destructive to OTHER humans…
The point is, there is a clear and known risk of early-stage AGIs being manipulated by humans with nasty or selfish motives, because many humans are known to have nasty or selfish motives. Whereas the propensity of advanced AGIs to annihilate lesser sentiences, remains a wild speculation (and one that I don’t really find all that credible)…..
I would personally trust a well-designed, self-improving AGI more than a national government that’s in possession of the world’s smartest near-human-level AGI; AGIs are somewhat of a wild card but can at least be designed with initially beneficent motivational systems, whereas national governments are known to generally be self-serving and prone to various sorts of faulty judgments…. This leads on to the notion of the AI Nanny, which I’ve written about before. But my point here isn’t to argue the desirability or otherwise of the AI Nanny — just to point out the kind of “semihard takeoff” that I think is actually plausible.
IMO what we’re likely to see is not a FOOM exactly, but still, a lot faster than AI skeptics would want to accept…. A Semihard Takeoff. Which is still risky in various ways, but in many ways more exciting than a true Hard Takeoff — because it will happen slowly enough for us to watch and feel it happen…
Go to... Home How-To Grid Threats Extreme Survival Survival Gardening Off-Grid Foods Worldview Natural Health Survival Hunting
Privacy | Financial | Current Events | Self Defense | Miscellaneous | Letters To Editor | About Off The Grid News | Off The Grid Videos | Weekly Radio Show
.
Smart meters are spying devices. Not breaking news? Likely not for those of us who have researched the issue for quite a long while, but an admission by those who make the devices is rather shocking.
That is exactly what has happened, as SmartGridNews, a website supported by the high-tech meter industry, acknowledged that smart meters are gathering private information on homeowners.
Smart meters utilize wireless technology and instantly tell power companies how much electricity a home is using, and even can report on the power usage by individual appliances, as Smart Grid News said. Smart meters also can literally control newer household appliances that have the capability to communicate with the device.
“One of the next areas of value comes from taking smart meter data and ‘disaggregating’ it to tell us exactly how customers are using electricity,” reads a new story on the website. “Do external devices already do this? Sure. Just as progress in the smart phone world reduced the need for external devices (cameras, alarm clocks, radios, pedometers, navigation systems, etc.) the ability to get accurate, appliance level feedback, without the need to invest in external hardware, is the next step in the world of smart meters.”
The Stop Smart Meters website states that fire dangers are also a problem associated with smart meters. Fire calls after smart meter installations reportedly include the shorting-out of electronics of all varieties and the burning-out of appliances.
FREE Book Reveals Facts About How To Create A Self-Sufficient, Off-The-Grid Lifestyle Using Solar Power!
Cyber hacking of smart meters to possibly overload and garner control of significant portions of the power grid is also an often-voiced worry about the smart power initiative. In Connecticut, 30 percent of customers in a pilot program had higher bills after smart meters were installed.
According to the Stop Smart Meters group, the smart grid devices do not always emit less RF (radio frequency) exposure than a cell phone — as some utility companies allegedly state.
“People are becoming increasingly aware of the potential harm done by chronic exposure to RF radiation-emitting devices and are taking steps to change how they use them. Most people are not offered a wired smart meter and you can’t turn it off once it is installed,” the group contends.
Story continues below video
Smart grid opponents have long opposed the gathering of their personal usage information.
Former CIA Director David Petraeus once stated that WiFi-connected devices, such as appliances commonly found inside many homes, will “transform the art of spying.” Petraeus also said that spies will be capable of monitoring Americans without going inside the home or perhaps even acquiring a warrant. He went on to state that remote control radio frequency identification devices, “energy harvesters,” sensor networks, and small embedded severs all connected to an Internet network will be all that is necessary for clandestine intelligence gathering.
The Smart Grid News report said customers surveyed in a recent report supported smart meters.
“Customers were delighted with the initiative as it showed how their new smart meters could work for them,” the website said. “Utility companies wanting to meet their specific conservation targets to drive customer engagement should ensure they are making the most of their smart meter investment. They can now use the power of smart meter data disaggregation to identify the customers who are most likely to help them reach their specific targets and turn them into willing partners in the drive for energy conservation.”
Data disaggregation basically means the automatic collection of personal energy habits of the homes attached to smart meters. The more customers know that is the case, the more they will oppose smart meters.
How do you feel about smart meters and the creation of a smart grid? Let us know in the comments section below.
16 comments
They've left me alone for the most part here recently. I am destroyed. haha The last time we spoke was over the Shakira thing. They were bullying Shakira and had me paint such a lovely picture of her being old and a gold-digger. And then I see the video, and I'm like, "How rude." Their technology has advanced in these past few years because they're slipping thoughts into my head, and I am not getting a headache nor feel detached from these new commands. Prior, I was in an odd position where I was split off from myself, and I could say, "no" to them. Now, that's more difficult. I only know it when my environment starts to clash, or I do something weird.
I still pick up on their stupid cues. I still do NOT want a husband, and I don't want a family. Like I've told them many times, and they're finally starting to respect me more, it's not going to happen. They're the little editors of our civilization. They'll "get it" eventually. I think they sterilized me anyway. I don't care. I would never make a child live in my shame, nor would I want to give them schizophrenia. Yes, I'm schizophrenic. No, I'm not delusional all of the time.
I wish Putin would compensate me so that I could live in a nice house away from humans. I hate humans.
The key to effective rumor control efforts is an ability to perform three functions.
- First, some mechanism is needed for determining what rumors are actually circulating.
- Second, an effective strategy is needed for determining which rumors are true, and which are false.
- Finally, mechanisms are needed for correcting inaccurate rumors and replacing them with reliable information.
The first step, rumor identification, requires the support of people in each constituency group who are in a position to hear the latest rumors as they are circulating. In general, these are people who are very active in the conflict and interested in developing more constructive approaches. It is often helpful to provide these "rumor reporters" with training so that they understand how misinformation can drive the cycle of destructive escalation. It is also important that these individuals to be widely trusted by members of their constituency group.
The next phase of the rumor control process requires a workable mechanism determining the truthfulness of rumors. Here "rumor investigators" (who may be the same people as the "rumor reporters" or others), help determine, from their group's perspective, the accuracy of rumors pertaining to their group. While there will certainly be cases were the practices of secrecy and deception makereliable rumor checking impossible, there will also be many cases in which incorrect rumors can be at least partially corrected.
![]() Additional insights into rumor control is offered by Beyond Intractability project participants. |
This rumor investigation mechanism can be structured in a variety of ways, as long as it provides information that is widely regarded as trustworthy and reliable. "Rumor reporters" might be organized into a committee made up of people from both or all sides that meets periodically to exchange information about current rumors and then organize efforts to determine their accuracy. These committees should also involve people with access to the information needed to conduct effective investigations.
Another way of structuring such a program involves widely-trusted neutral intermediaries who systematically contact key parties involved in a conflict to identify and investigate the latest rumors. When these intermediaries hear a story that they think is likely to be untrue, they initiate an investigation to try to determine whether or not the story is accurate. Also needed is a plan for handling inconclusive investigations. This means that the investigators have to clearly acknowledge cases in which they are unable to determine the reliability of rumor.
The third and final phase of rumor control efforts is rumor correction. Here the investigators need some reliable mechanism for promptly reporting their findings to interested parties. In cases were there is no agreement on what has happened, they should report what is known, what is not known, and what is still being investigated. They should also report differing interpretations of available facts. When an investigation determines that the rumor is not true, then a plan for correcting the error should be initiated. The success of this plan depends upon the credibility of the intermediaries and their ability to communicate widely, effectively, and quickly.
Mosr humans are prone to linear thinking. Or approaching a problem with a prescribed starting point, or even structure as well. This king of thinking has permeated life. Sciencd, medicine, politics, etc....are often the victim of linear thought.
Here is an excerpt from an article tgat talks some about Non-linear thinking.
Non-Linear Thinking
Non-linear thinking, a relatively new term, is vague enough (perhaps naturally so) that a simple google search will yield more beatings-around-the-bushes than formal definitions for the phrase. I think of it as follows:
Human thought characterized by expansion in multiple directions, rather than in one direction, and based on the concept that there are multiple starting points from which one can apply logic to a problem.
Non-linear thinking is less constrictive – letting the creative side of you run rampant because of its inherent lack of structure. It’s kind of like letting a puppy run wild on a walk up a mountain – anything of interest will be thoroughly investigated (and perhaps peed on) before jumping to the next, possibly non-related subject! It’s very much like brainstorming – allowing thought to flow, unhindered, in attempts to arrive upon something special in the process.
Non-linear thought increases possible outcomes by not being so certain about the starting point for any logic process. Non-linear thinkers tend to jump forward, and from side to side through the steps of a project, in an effort to see the big picture and tackle those areas where they have the most interest. Where non-linear thinking falters is in finally carrying out the required action, because as a thought process it often encourages a user to agonize incessantly over where to start (that agreed upon truth, from which logic can be applied and action can be taken).
A new form of digital presentation created by the folks at Prezi.com is a great example of non-linear and linear thinking in action. Why? Because rather than a linear slide show, it’s ultimately a picture, into which you can zoom in and out, infinitely. It allows you to present a product, concept, or argument in a logically by moving from location to location what is essentially group of images, but at any point you can zoom out and suddenly, “See the big picture” takes on a whole new meaning – Check it out!
http://educate-yourself.org/lte/norwaymindcontrol09dec10.shtml
December 9, 2010
Norway Man Confusing Mind Control Victimization with "Spirit Guides" (Dec. 9, 2010)
Subject: Please advice me on my issue!
From: Daniel (Norway)
Date: Tue, December 7, 2010
To: Ken Adachi
Hello,
My name Is Daniel. I'm 27 years old and I live in Norway. Could you please share your knowledge about God and the spirit guides and what they can do and cannot do to me? Every day I experience being commanded by voices in my head and urging impulses to do and say things that I don't want to do or say, often irrational, hurting and violent things. It's like I'm being forced and I hear voices that say "You must" or "say it" "do it"! And I get the sensation that I sin so terribly by not doing what the voices and impulses urge and command me to do, like I'm disobedient to my spirit guides or God. I live in constant worry, doubt, guilt and feeling of disobedience and intimidation. I can honestly say that I'm not free.
Like I cannot choose for myself what to do or not to do without feeling judged for it or feeling sinful and disobedient. I have wondered if I might have implants, but I believe so strongly that it's my spirit guides commanding and urging me.
Other voices I hear is "shut up", "silent",- this too I believe is from my spirit guides, and a verse from the bible: "shake of fear", and this I believe Jesus Christ is saying!! Also, I get thoughts, impulses and ideas about hitting and killing and whenever I see a knife or scissor it's like something or someone is urging me to use it on another being, and I get the idea that it's in my karma to harm or kill another being to achieve balance for my soul. In addition to this I also experience being hit and pushed in my head and lifted in my hand quite often,-especially when I'm about to use my computer to read or chat with my girlfriend, and this too I believe is my guides, but I feel intimidated to stay away from the PC! I have no idea what to believe anymore. I really can't say I believe that I have free will,- if I have I am certainly not respected for my choices cause I experience being forced and corrected all the time and always get impulses and ideas of saying/doing things that will hurt another being and leave me completely irrational. Everything I have read and believed in don't have value anymore cause my experience of life contradicts all that! Please reply and tell me what you think.
Thank You!
Daniel
***
Hello Daniel,
You're being victimized by mind control technologies. You are not hearing from Spirit Guides or angels. or Jesus, or God, despite your impression to the contrary. You are definitely implanted. You can take that to the bank.
These implants are allowing this technology to work. The signals are being transmitted into your brain by microwaves and scalar transmissions. There are either humans, aliens, or COMPUTERS responsible for what you are hearing.
You are in some kind of "program" run by your government, your military, intelligence agencies, powerful corporate interests, a cult group, or even law enforcement. You likely have a family connection that set you up for this. Or you were involved with some group or organization that targeted you for victimization.
You probably already have a firm suspicion as to whom I'm referring. Why don't you fill in the blanks for me so we can both learn more?
Regards, Ken
***
Subject: Re: Please advice me on my issue!
From: Daniel
Date: Fri, December 10, 2010
To: Ken Adachi
Thanks for your reply Ken.
I actually hope you're right, because then I have hope that the implants will be removed.
I can tell you that I have been in and out of psychiatric institutions since I was nineteen and is currently in one now. I'm 27 now. also, I have been on a medication called Risperdal for about four years. I get this "medication" through injections into my butt every second week and I have thought this"medication" might contain implants. do you know anything about this drug and the treatment??
What family connection I have regarding implants I am unsure of, but my family have always trusted the psychiatry and they were the ones that got me committed the first times and have never questioned the treatment or the doctors.
If only I knew I am implanted I would have a much different approach to what I am experiencing, but right now I know nothing and nothing seems right anymore.
Please reply.
Thank You!
Daniel
***
Hi Daniel,
Psychiatric drugs are damaging and harmful as they produce long term side effects affecting the nervous system. You should try to get legal help to get out of there. The people who run psychiatric hospitals know all about the mind control programs, because they work hand in hand with the intelligence services, etc, but they won't admit anything to you, so don't bother asking them.
There are many thousands upon thousands of people around the world who are in the same situations you are, so don't think you are alone. If you keep telling these "voices" in your head that you are aware of their game and you know that they are human scum bags and not spirit guides, etc. If you stick to your guns, they will eventually drop the BS and admit to you that they are messing with you.
Don't doubt yourself. That's what they want. You're being victimized, have no doubt about it. Try turning the tables on them and talk about love and forgiveness and Light and tell them there is nothing to be gained from a life of evil and darkness. You might be surprised at what you hear back from them.
Regards,Ken
***
Subject: Re: Please advice me on my issue!
From: Daniel
Date: Fri, December 10, 2010
To: Ken Adachi
Thank You Ken.
Again, I do hope you're right. I don't want this to be coming from guides, the Lord or God.
Daniel
***
Hi Daniel,
Perhaps your life experiences have prevented you from understanding some basic concepts concerning our interaction with the spirit world. Spirit Guides, Angels, God, Jesus, and our Higher Self are certainly real, but they don't express their influence to us through out conscience mind.
Their influence is much more subtle than that and it arises within the SUBCONSCIOUS mind. What we call "intuition" or a pang of "conscience" when we are about to do something bad, is how your Higher Self and your Spirit Guides communicate with you. They don't produce voices in your head and they certainly wouldn't tell you things of a negative nature or to berate you or condemn you or anything as nutsy as that. Like I already told you, you are being victimized by humans (and perhaps aliens) because you are snagged in some sort of mind control operation.
There's nothing mysterious or mystical about it. Somebody is sitting at a computer terminal somewhere in an underground facility and is sending you these voices. It is often done AUTOMATICALLY by COMPUTERS, but very often humans will talk to you directly to torment you in some way.
You didn't tell me when this started. There was some point in your life that you didn't hear these voices and then at some later point you did. Somewhere around the time when you first began to hear these voices is where to look for whoever set you up for this.
Regards, Ken
I have been studying thought processes and how they lend themselves to communication. Being that we all have such different experiences, and the way that we process those experiences is also different, we come up with different conclusions. How we view our differences can expose our motive. ...but motuve us another discussion altogether.
Herd is an article discussing the difference between linear and non linear thinking. It is deep, but its worth the read!

Wondering why communication is so hard? Or how two, intelligent, educated people can come to such different conclusions on any given topic? I suggest it’s because we don’t all use the same processes to think. Dive in and comment below – there’s a great debate and we want your opinion!
I was tasked at work to blog on the difference between Linear and Non-Linear thinking, and how it relates to business. Not being an expert in the subject (but not feeling limited in expressing my opinion either) I dove in. Please feel free to comment – I love hearing your opinion.
Logic and Creativity
Some of us pride ourselves on being logical. We think through ideas with the efficiency of a well-oiled machine. We enjoy structured thought and evidence-based conclusions. I’m sure you know the type – we plan out every step of a process, follow the Gantt chart to the “t”, and ensure results within schedules and deadlines.
Others of us pride ourselves on being creative. We rejoice in the big ideas, in the new discoveries, and in the satisfaction of creation. We are always coming up with new ways to solve problems, love the questions “what if?” and don’t mind jumping ahead in a conversation to tell you what we just thought of.
I suggest that these two characteristics of humans (logic and creativity) are often correlated with two different, but not disconnected types of thought processes: Linear and non-Linear thinking. Rather than argue that one is more important than the other, I suggest that they are both integral to success in business and, on the grander scale, life.
The Linearity of Logic
“Linear Thinking” is defined as:
a process of thought following known cycles or step-by-step progression where a response to a step must be elicited before another step is taken.
If a = b, and b = c, then a = c. The application of linear thinking can be found in the well knownSocratic Method:
a form of inquiry and debate between individuals with opposing viewpoints based on asking and answering questions to stimulate rational thinking and to illuminate ideas
Jan Helfeld (pronounced Iain), a rather infamous libertarian reporter, provides an amusing (or infuriating – depending on who’s side you’re on) application of the Socratic method to our political representatives. It’s all very logical, and for those who don’t build their policies or opinions on logic, it’s a game that raises tempers with captivating efficiency. After watching, I tend to wonder if any of our policy makers think through their political conclusions logically. Logic seems lost from our world, like an ancient language that’s spoken only by tribes of some distant jungle.
More important to this blog’s argument however, is that Jan’s use of the Socratic method is also extremely linear. As much as the person in the hot seat wants to jump around and evade, Jan forces them to answer one question before they move on to the next. The videos remind me of walking a puppy – when they want to walk every direction but the one you’re traveling. You rein them in every time before moving forward.
Though you may doubt it after watching Jan Helfeld’s videos, much of our world is indeed structured upon the concept of logic (very basic logic at least). We learn math, deductive reasoning, and tend to apply these logical processes to our everyday life. Our drive to do so comes from our inherent need, as cognitive humans, to categorize our experiences in our minds and make projections about what the outcome of an action will be. We compare our expectations with our experience, weigh the similarity, and adjust our thought processes as needed.
Linear thinkers are very much the same. They start at step one and usually do a good and efficient job of completing the task before moving on to step two. They are driven, focused, and don’t easily get off topic. Does this sound like you? Perhaps. Or maybe it sounds like the person in the office you have a tough time working with?
The Dangers of Logic
There’s a danger in relying too heavily on logic. The danger is in the determination of the starting point. Once a starting point is chosen, there are a limited number of logical conclusions to a problem. For example, imagine a store owner who believes that he must raise his revenues to increase his profits. He tries multiple methods including advertising, increasing inventory, and product bundling to make every possible sale to his customers. But he forgot that he could also reduce his costs to increase profits, and in doing so missed what could have been much less expensive, less demanding options.
This example is simplistic, but it underscores the point that for any logical process, there must be a decided-upon truth as a starting point. And the beauty of logic, is that it allows us to reach an answer from a given starting point. It’s easy, however, to rely upon starting points simply because they’re what we’ve used all our lives – starting points that either may be false, or that limit us from finding a much better answer.
Non-Linear Thinking
Non-linear thinking, a relatively new term, is vague enough (perhaps naturally so) that a simple google search will yield more beatings-around-the-bushes than formal definitions for the phrase. I think of it as follows:
Human thought characterized by expansion in multiple directions, rather than in one direction, and based on the concept that there are multiple starting points from which one can apply logic to a problem.
Non-linear thinking is less constrictive – letting the creative side of you run rampant because of its inherent lack of structure. It’s kind of like letting a puppy run wild on a walk up a mountain – anything of interest will be thoroughly investigated (and perhaps peed on) before jumping to the next, possibly non-related subject! It’s very much like brainstorming – allowing thought to flow, unhindered, in attempts to arrive upon something special in the process.
Non-linear thought increases possible outcomes by not being so certain about the starting point for any logic process. Non-linear thinkers tend to jump forward, and from side to side through the steps of a project, in an effort to see the big picture and tackle those areas where they have the most interest. Where non-linear thinking falters is in finally carrying out the required action, because as a thought process it often encourages a user to agonize incessantly over where to start (that agreed upon truth, from which logic can be applied and action can be taken).
A new form of digital presentation created by the folks at Prezi.com is a great example of non-linear and linear thinking in action. Why? Because rather than a linear slide show, it’s ultimately a picture, into which you can zoom in and out, infinitely. It allows you to present a product, concept, or argument in a logically by moving from location to location what is essentially group of images, but at any point you can zoom out and suddenly, “See the big picture” takes on a whole new meaning – Check it out!
In Conclusion
Again, as in my introduction, I stress the importance of both processes. And what I mean by this is maybe it’s important to have both types of thinkers on a team. Use non-linear thought to reexamine starting points and increase the possibility of finding the best option, and use linear thinkers and their efficient logic-based reasoning, once a starting point has been established, to get the job done in a timely manner. Whatever mixture of these two processes you prefer, take responsibility for your choices and learn from your mistakes, and I’ll bet on your success.
“Excellence can be obtained if you care more than others think is wise, risk more than others think is safe, dream more than others think is practical, expect more than others think is possible.” ~Unknown
After several excruciatingly painful and profoundly frightening years of undiagnosed symptoms, I was diagnosed with a “progressive and incurable” neurological disease, Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy/Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (RSD/CRPS), which is characterized by unrelenting pain that is disproportionate to the inciting event, usually an injury or trauma.
As luck would have it, I was diagnosed and, shortly after, hospitalized for the first of three times just as I was accepted into a Master’s program for clinical social work.
I always saw myself obtaining a Master’s Degree and a Ph.D., but how would I accomplish these grueling and seemingly impossible tasks if I could barely stand up long enough to brush my teeth on a cocktail of the most potent narcotics available?
I didn’t have the answer to this question, and a flood of fear and doubt rose up within me like a tsunami crashing onto the shore, drowning hope and destroying all of the life in its path.
I pushed onward despite overwhelming feelings of fear, and medical professionals suggesting that I should quit graduate school and go on disability.
That was three years ago, and now, I have a Master’s Degree in clinical social work (MSW) and a professional license to boot (LSW). Not to mention, I no longer take any medication for the RSD/CRPS thanks to coffee enemas, a vegan diet (heavy on the fresh, organic fruit and vegetable juices), and a will and desperation to be healthy.*
At best, my traditional doctors predicted a life full of yearly or bi-yearly week-long hospitalizations where I would receive a continuous I.V. drip of the powerful anesthetic, ketamine (better known by its street name, “special K”), which can temporarily control the pain for some individuals.
I couldn’t accept that portrait of my future, so I decided to paint my own. In my version, colors and health were vibrant and smiles and possibilities were endless. “Can’t” changed to “heck yes, I can” and “incurable and progressive” weren’t part of the vocabulary, no matter what they said.
Was obtaining my Master’s Degree the biggest challenge of my young life thus far? Absolutely. Would I do it again? In a heartbeat.
In fact, my continuously improving health moves that Ph.D. out on the horizon closer and closer to the palm of my hand, and victory never tastes as sweet as when it is achieved with the odds against you.
Below are my five tips on how to succeed despite the odds.
1. Die to the past.
Forget what you know. Forget what everyone has told you. Die to the past, and while you’re at it, remember: the present is not a means to get to the future. If you think of it that way, you will be perpetually unfulfilled.
Be mindful of the present moment because the past is over, and the future doesn’t exist. The only moment is now.
Take a moment to allow yourself to be in awe of the wonders of the world and the divine intelligence that helps those ordinary miracles unfold. Your miracle is unfolding right now, and you’ll miss it if you continue to live without awareness.
2. Surrender to the unknown.
Surrendering has never been my forte because I have a tendency to want to control my environments, which means I can end up living in the future, not in the present moment. Worrying is wasted energy, and no amount of those toxic thoughts will ever change the outcome.
I believe a higher power has a plan for me, and as I look back on my life so far, I realize I have always been put in the places I needed to be to personally and professionally grow and develop. Regardless of your spiritual beliefs, trust that you will never come up against more than you can handle.
Relax, and let life flow through you.
3. Dare to dream.
The limitations we perceive are put in place by us and only us. Take some time to sit in stillness and tap into your innate intuitive abilities.
Silencing the critical voices of others and that critical voice within you will allow you to get in touch with your desires and the possibilities of achieving them. It is the “impossible” that stretches you, shows you what you can become, and aids in the formation of who you are meant to be.
4. Support yourself.
A rock solid support system is essential, but you cannot overcome an obstacle if you don’t believe in yourself. Have confidence in yourself and your abilities because if you don’t, no one else will either.
The negative thoughts that you harbor about yourself will ultimately be sent out into the universe and affect how your life unfolds.
When you believe in your potential, your life will take on a whole new expression. “I can’t” turns into “I will.” Remember, you are divinity in motion, so start acting like it.
5. Go all in.
Anyone who has experienced any kind of success understands that it does not come without hard work, discipline, and dedication. When you come from behind and achieve the impossible, the triumph seems so much greater. Determination, commitment, and a burning desire to see your dreams through will help you achieve any goal your intuition guides you toward.
Now, go in the direction of your dreams, even if they seem impossible. You deserve unbounded success, and you are worthy of miracles. I have faith in you and all that you can be. Do you?
黄家佐(芮成钢之父):电视剧制作人,儿童文学《新来的小石柱》的作者。
芮淑敏(芮成钢之母。黄家佐之妻):中国舞蹈家协会理事、安徽省舞蹈家协会名誉主席。
芮成钢(安徽合肥人,1977年):央视财经主持人,利己主义者,只为江派势力代言,语言粗鲁,备受争议,高官太太小白脸,与薄公子薄瓜瓜常聚会,有消息说芮成钢不但出卖机密情报,而且已加入国外间谍组织,是特务, 性质超乎想象的严重,已写出十万多字交代材料,面临死刑。
黄燕宁(芮成钢之姐):安徽电视台的女主播,1990年入籍定居美国。
江氏谱系
江世俊(江泽民的生父,汉奸,怕名声不好,改为江冠千,1894—1973):汪精卫政权宣传部副部长兼社论委员会主任委员,最著名的汉奸作家胡兰成手下的一员大将,南京沦陷后,又供职于南京临时维持会,为侵华日军效力。
吴月卿(江世俊之妻,1897—1977):
江世杰(江泽民大叔,早夭):
江世豪(江泽民二叔,早夭):
梁慕园(江泽民姨夫):
江世英(江泽民大姨,梁慕园之妻,1906—约1948):
江世雄(江泽民四叔,又名江慕陶,1909—1966):
杨桂芬(江世雄之妻,1911—1944):
江上青(江泽民五叔,又名江世侯,老六,1911—1939):1939年被乱枪打死时,才28岁。
王者兰(江上青的妻子,1911—1985):
江世伯(江泽民六叔,又名江树峰,老七,1914—1993):
胡齐德(江世伯之妻,1916—1983):
江世俊一支
江泽君(江泽民之兄,已死):
曹树仁(江泽芬之夫):
江泽芬(江泽民之姐):
江泽民(江世俊二子,网称江蛤蟆、江蜘蛛,为了掩饰父亲汉奸的身份,自称父亲是江上青,墓碑上标明江泽民是江世俊儿子。黄敬下属,1926.08.17—2014):原中共主席、国家主席、军委主席,是潜伏在中国的一名老牌克格勃特工,网传江泽民已死,对于江泽民的死,中国人分成对立的两派,一派希望他早死,因为实在太可恨了;另一派强烈希望他不死,因为他还没接受审判!
。
王冶平(江泽民原配,):
克拉娃(江泽民俄国情妇):克格勃色情间谍,效力于苏联克格勃情报间谍机关。
宋祖英(江泽民情妇):唱歌的。
江泽宽(江泽民之弟):财大气粗老板,章子怡放弃千万片酬,只求与江泽宽元旦节共进烛光晚餐
江泽南(江泽民之妹,又名江泽兰):
江绮云(江绮雲,江泽民之妹):江泽民卖3百万平方公里国土给俄罗斯,叶利钦给江泽民上亿美元私人回扣,江泽民将上亿美元交江绮云转存香港汇丰银行。江泽民总贪污10万亿美元(62万亿人民币)存香港汇丰银行。2014年3月26日,江绮云 委托表姐的儿子钟棣杭(34岁香港人),吴品祥(63岁台湾籍),华立慧(60岁)等五人拿着持有人是江绮云,总金额为10万亿美元的3份【定期存款证明书】,到汇丰银行吩咐银行经理在【定期存款证明书】上加签钟棣杭等人名字,更指出该10万亿美元【定期存款证明书】的合法持有人江绮云是江泽民的妹妹,银行经理报警将5人拘捕,称文书虚假。2014年11月21日在香港法院开审钟棣杭等5人,被控管有虚假文书副本、使用虚假文书等罪名。钟棣杭指他是受江泽民妹妹江绮云所托将文件带来香港。江世雄一支
江泽群(江世雄之女):海辉软件(国际)集团公司 HR。
江乔生(江世雄长子,早夭):
江庆生(江世雄二子,又名江均祥):
江世侯一支
江泽玲(江上青长女):
倪发科(江泽民女婿,江泽慧之妻):安徽省原副省长,
江泽慧(江上青二女,江泽民堂妹,1938):中国林业科学院院长。
方西屏(方东屏之弟):原安徽淮南市委书记,依仗江泽民的势力胡作非为,与倪发科联手做了许多伤天害理的事,民间有“拆迁狂人”之称,他下令炸掉当地首座五星级酒店,他的权力声震安徽无人质疑。2010年11月3日,车牌为“皖O-00336”的黑色奥迪车。
方东屏(方西屏之兄):合肥市人大常委会内务司法工作委员会主任。
江世伯一支
江泽中(江世伯之,又名江执中):
江磐 (江世伯之女,):
宋祖玉(宋祖英妹妹,又叫宋佳玲):深航董事。
宋祖荣(宋祖英聋哑弟弟):
江绵恒(江泽民长子,1952生):中国电信集团公司董事长,总裁,中国网通创办人,公司市值一千六百六十六亿元,现在仅是上海科技大学校长,中科院上海硅酸盐研究所所长,上海联和投资有限公司老板。
江绵康(江泽民次子):留学德国,西门子中国有限公司CEO。
江志成(Alvin Jiang,江泽民孙子):香港博裕基金的创始合伙人,阿里巴巴老板。
王荣 (江泽民外甥,王冶坪的侄子):深圳市委书记。
黄丽满():前深圳市委书记。
陈至立():前教育部长、时任国务委员,中科院上海硅酸盐研究所。
贾廷安():江泽民秘书。现任中共总政副主任。
王宗南():上海商人光明董事长,黄浦区区长助理、副区长,挪用公款和受贿上亿。
吴志明(亲父江泽宽,江泽民的侄子,又名吴德新):上海前政法委书记。
李泽源():深航公司老板,伪造公司印章,因经济刑事问题先后三次入狱,2014年1月17号,被法院以挪用资金罪判处有期徒刑10年。
吴钰骅(吴志明之子):上海闸北分局警督,打伤杨佳的。
顾毓秀(江苏无锡人,):江泽民老师,有顾毓秀纪念馆。
尹明华():上海解放日报报业集团社长,江派成员。
马伊里(女,):2012年上海市民政局局长。
施小琳(女,1969年5月出生):2013年任上海市民政局党组书记、局长,市社团管理局党组书记。
俞言长(俞):上海市闵行区民政局局长、党委书记。上海市闵行区民政局七莘路680号 邮编:201100
钱志 ():上海市闵行区民政局党委副书记、纪委书记,主管福利彩票发行。
陈光标():专发国难财的,5.12汶川地震赚到20亿,哪里有灾难,陈光标就出现在哪里,哪里的房屋倒塌越多陈光标赚得越多,5.12汶川地震倒塌房屋几万幢,陈光标靠垄断拆除危房中的钢铁赚得20亿。
周义生(周秀金之夫):农民。
周秀金(周义生之妻):
周永康(周义生周秀金长子,王淑华、贾晓烨之夫,原名周元根):前政法委书记,掌管公安、武警、国安、法院、检察等政法系统,政法帮、石油帮、四川帮、秘书帮、辽宁帮帮主,住宅326套,黄金42.85公斤,车62辆,字画10亿元,现金1.79亿元人民币,各型枪27支,子弹1万余发,1694个金融账号内资金377.336亿元,金融等证券市值513亿元,境外证券市值1.7亿元,加上用1000万从蒋洁敏处收购3000亿辽河油田,总贪污受贿盗窃4千亿元 ,发动多次政变未成,谋杀13人,2次暗杀领导性质及其严重,自爆与谷开来有私情,罪行累累。
王淑华(周永康第一任妻):中石油勘探研究院档案处处长,死于周永康设计的车祸。
黄汲清(周永康亲家):
贾晓烨(江泽民侄女,周永康第二任妻,1970年出生):曾任央视主播,参与买官卖官。
贾晓霞(贾晓烨之姐):中油国际加拿大公司总经理,现躲藏在加拿大卡尔加里。
周滨 (周永康王淑华长子,又名周斌):中旭能科前董事长,涉足水利、石油、公租房等多领域,利用父亲周永康的影响力介入司法案件,调包死囚案:买通司法系统中的警察,强用其他在押人员调包死囚,顶替死刑犯赴死,在执行死刑时,再把替死者的器官强行摘除贩卖。调包死囚的黑市价码一般在300万元上下,倒卖土地、掌控工程、操控司法,权钱交易,大发横财。2013年12月涉嫌非法经营罪,被湖北省宜昌市检察院批准逮捕。
黄婉 (黄渝生詹敏利之女,周滨之妻):持有美国籍护照中旭能科前董事长,在加拿大。
黄渝生(詹敏利之夫):中旭能科监事,在美国 。
詹敏利(黄渝生之妻):周滨白手套,在美国 。
周涵 (周永康二子,曾用名周寒):中石油北京油气调控中心党委办主任,2013年底携妻儿出走美国,目前定居休斯顿。
周元兴(周义生周秀金次子,-201402):收杀人犯巨额钱款,用穷人顶添杀人犯受死。
周晓华(周元兴之子):五粮液代理商,开车违章被交警拦车后打交警两个耳光。
周元青(周义生周秀金三子,周玲英之夫):很凶的文革造反派头子,曾任无锡市惠山区国土局副局长,2013年12月被抓。
周玲英(周元青之妻):垄断无锡豪车市场与天然气生意,2013年12月被抓。
周峰 (周元青周玲英之子):北京宏汉董事长,鸿丰钾矿大股东。
康世恩(1915—1995):原国务院副总理、石油工业部部长。
李东生():前央视副台长,前公安部党委副书记、副部长,中央防范和处理邪教问题办公室主任,严重违纪违法。2013年12月被中纪委双规调查;2014年6月被开除党籍公职移交司法,2014年7月被最高人民检察院立案侦查。
薄一波(共有七位子女):前副总理。
张龙海(张素燕之父,谷景文亲家):原空军副司令。
谷景生(薄一波亲家):原总政治部副主任。
李雪峰(薄一波亲家):第三届全国人大常委会副委员长。
李丹宇(李雪峰之女,薄熙来前妻):北京总医院军医。
李望知(薄熙来李丹宇之子,原名薄望知):基金投资。
李小雪(李雪峰之子,谷丹之夫):曾任中国证券监督管理委员会纪委书记、党委委员。
谷丹 (谷景生三女,李小雪之妻):北京数学教师。
郑耀文(薄一波女婿):原驻丹麦大使,工商联副主席。
薄熙莹(薄一波长女,郑耀文的妻子,已去世):曾任中共外交部非洲司司长。
薄洁莹(薄一波二女,山西定襄县蒋村人,):现任卫生部国际交流与合作中心副理事长。
薄熙永(化名李学明,薄一波长子):中国光大集团执行董事兼副总经理。
薄熙来(1949,薄一波二子):中央政治局委员,原商务部部长;法国房产,总贪污受贿100亿,表面上看薄熙来是弱势群体的精神领袖,实际上是为夺权做的表演,从他参与江泽民周永康腐败势力政变可知,他是只讲权力不讲法律的独裁贪官。
谷开来(谷开莱,谷景生五女,薄熙来之妻):北京开来律师所所长,让王立军抓四姐谷望宁。
薄瓜瓜(薄熙来谷开来之子,又名薄京瓜):在国外。
薄小莹(薄一波三女):北京大学历史系副教授。
薄熙成(薄一波三子):北京六合安消防科技有限公司董事长。
薄熙宁(薄一波四子):北京六合兴集团有限公司董事长。
谷俊山(谷景文之子,谷景生弟弟,谷开来的叔叔):前总后勤部副部长,贪污200多亿、68亿开三家美容院、房产300余处值9亿、住7000多平米小楼值2亿、茅台酒570箱价值342万阴谋与周永康薄熙来政变成功后庆祝,总贪污受贿400亿,一半用来行贿;调查人员搜查了谷俊山建在老家的仓库,拉走了满满四卡车东西,其中包括20箱名酒和一尊纯金毛主席雕像。
张素燕(谷俊山之妻,张龙海之女):濮阳市高新公安分局局长,市公安局政委,截访工作。
谷献军(谷俊山弟弟):开发商。
谷望江(谷景生长女,曾用名汪江,女,1947年12月生):香港籍,在海内外拥有20多家合资公司及独资公司。
谷政协(谷景生二女):中国机械工业集团有限公司党委副书记、纪委书记。
谷望宁(谷景生四女):瓜瓜科技(北京)有限公司法人代表。
徐明 ():薄熙来麾下的钱袋子。
曾山 (曾庆红之父,老家江西):原特务头子,内政部长。
曾庆红(曾山长子,1938.09,小名丁丁,余秋里与曾山都是江西吉安老乡):国家副主席,广东持有豪宅,贪污受贿1100亿,财产:商用大厦100650平方米,市值72亿,别墅82套,6亿人民币,持有21家上市公司证券市值68亿,金融机构账号70个约12亿,度假村、高尔夫球场、农场、汽车、游艇等约12亿元,地产物业中香港有4套,澳门有2套市值2亿,澳洲、新西兰、英国等有8到10套住宅,1个果园;
王凤清(曾庆红之妻,67岁):中国认证认可协会会长;
曾伟 (曾庆红之子,曾山孙子):将价值1,100亿山东鲁能集团改到自己名下成为曾伟私产,在悉尼以2.4亿人民币(当时合3200万澳元)购PointPiper豪宅。
蒋梅 (曾伟之妻): CCTV主持人。 。
曾庆淮(曾山二子):中华文化城有限公司总裁;与宋祖英、杨澜和刘嘉玲关系密切,是大陆艺人巴结的对象。
曾庆洋(曾山三子):军事科学院军事历史部部长、少将;
曾庆源(曾山四子):解放军空军后勤部副部长、空军少将;
曾海生(曾山之女):总参办公厅副主任、少将;
谭晶 ():总政歌手。
赵安 ():原央视文艺部主任,经常为曾庆淮选美女。后来,赵安得罪了曾庆淮,被曾庆淮送进监狱。
张志毅():原广州军区炮兵副司令员。
张XX(张XX之子):动车相撞下令埋车。
赵南起():原中共总后勤部长,彭德怀的朝语翻译,女儿涉深航案。
占国桥():赵南起秘书。现任兰州军区联勤部长。
甘霖 ():张德江秘书,原任广东省委副秘书长,现任四川省副省长。
徐才厚():军委前副主席,4次买凶谋杀刘源,秘书上缴800张银行卡,贪污受贿千亿,4套上海房产,欲接近徐,敲门费至少要100万元。
赵XX (徐才厚之妻):
徐思宁(徐才厚女儿):吉林省实验读过高中,军队总部。
赵丹娜(徐才厚妻子的侄女,22岁):利用香港八个银行帐户洗黑钱100亿港币,被港警抓捕后,放弃3000万港元保释费潜逃回大陆。
郭沫若():
郭长江(郭沫若之子):中国红十字副会长,中国红十字会党组成员、机关党委书记。
丘振良():中国国际跨国公司研究会副会长、天略集团董事长
郭登峰(郭美美母亲):
郭美美(情妇,有17.2G视频,真名郭美玲,小名洋洋,1991年6月15日出生于湖南省益阳市):
陈云 (1905.06.13-1995.04.10):国务院副总理,商业部部长。
刘华清(湖北大悟人):前国家副主席,原中共中央军委副主席
宋任穷(原名宋韵琴):前中顾委副主任,杀害刘志丹的凶手,宋任穷后代的情况是美国对中国高官后代深具吸引力的最极端代表;
钟月林(宋任穷之妻):宋任穷8个子女(二男六女),有5人生活在美国,三个女儿一个儿子是美国永久居民;
陈伟力(陈云长女,又名陈维力,又一说法是陈良宇之子):1988年任中国新技术创业国际有限公司董事长;
陈元 (陈云长子,刘朝英之夫,1945.01,上海青浦人):国家开发银行行长,涉薄熙来案;
刘朝英(刘华清之女,陈元之妻):北京长城公司经理部经理;
陈伟华(陈云二女):历史教师,政协委员。
陈伟兰(陈云三女):中共中央组织部青年干部局局长,国家行政学院副院长;
陈方 (陈云幼子,妻宋珍珍):广东中山实业公司经理;
宋珍珍(宋任穷三女,陈方之妻,后离婚,又名宋真真):热爱美国自由,目前开公司从事网上付费业务,和一名美国人同居;
许鸣真():原国防科工委纪检书记。
许永跃(许鸣真之子):原陈云秘书,原安全部部长。
刘卓明(刘华清之子):总装备部科技委副主任、少将;
潘岳 (刘华清女婿,刘超英前夫,1960年4月出生,汉族,江苏南京人):国有资产管理局副局长,环境保护部副部长。
刘超英(刘华清之女,潘岳前妻,后来离婚):曾任总参情报部五局副局长,1996年美国竞选财务丑闻的主要人物之一,给美国民主党捐赠了366000美元,最终所有的钱都被退回。
徐运北(1914年出生,山东堂邑人,曾用名徐鸿轩):曾任中共贵州省委副书记
徐念沙(徐运北之子,刘晓丽之夫,刘华清女婿):任保利集团党委书记。
刘晓丽(刘华清之女,徐念沙之妻):
陈晓丹(陈元刘朝英之女,陈云孙女,曾是薄瓜瓜恋人):
陈小欣(陈元之子,陈云孙子,又叫Charles):私募股权公司“盘实基金”(ABAX)。
宋克荒(宋任穷长子):北京置业地产公司总裁,党员,美国永久居民,与他同为美国公民的妻儿住尔湾一栋价值约95万美元的豪宅,与陈元是同学。
宋静波(宋任穷次子,又名宋京波):曾留学法国,
宋勤 (宋任穷长女):中国煤炭进出口集团公司党委书记、副董事长;
黄德生(宋任穷女婿,宋勤之夫):百年树人集团副总裁。
宋彬彬(宋任穷次女 ,1947-- 署名宋要武,):北京师大女附中学生,要武装,不要红装,文革中打死8人,文革结束后不久,便离开中国到了美国,嫁给一名美国公民,居美波士顿。
宋昭昭(宋任穷四女):在美国
宋月飞(宋任穷五女):在北京
宋钊钊(宋任穷幼女,宋釗釗):密歇根大学医疗中心护士,年入82000美元,
宋米勒(宋克荒的儿子,Miller Song,1981年):
刘铁男(陈好情夫):原国家发改委副主任,非法倒卖国有资产,25个银行账户,9公斤黄金、25颗钻石、1900万澳元,8.7亿贪腐财产,总受贿贪污20亿,他拥有12本不同国别的护照,被捕时随身带着澳洲护照,名字是刘亚平,飞往悉尼和多伦多的机票,220万澳币准备随时外逃。
陈好 (刘铁男情妇):知名演员,有“万人迷”之称,通过倪日涛内幕交易在国中水务(600187)一夜暴富,在“ST黑龙”赚2700万。
倪日涛():拥有庞大的控股帝国,中竹控股实际控制人,平时为人低调很少张扬,与刘铁男结成官商同盟。
张羽 ():央视名嘴,通过倪日涛内幕交易在“ST黑龙”上一夜暴富。
崔某():河北邯郸市邯山区工业信息化局局长,敛财1.4亿元,携带47张银行卡和13个U盾、4个笔记本电脑、3个不同身份证、2万余元现金、2把不同类型的车钥匙以及1个移动硬盘外逃,2014年6月30日10点撞车死亡。
移民美國的宋任穷家族
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_708e759d0102ee8z.html
【按】毛泽东领导的伟大革命的最耀眼的成果之一,就是那些德高望重的无产阶级革命家的子子孙孙们,几乎无一例外的都从“无产者”变身为“有产者”,其资产数额,轻者亿万,多者数十亿、数百亿。其中,“个别”佼佼者还变身为宣誓效忠于“美帝”的公民。抚今追昔,这不能不说是个举世无两的伟大奇迹!
中共元老宋任窮的八個子女有五個居住在美國。18大後,媒体採訪宋家的二三代包括宋彬彬。
中共元老宋任窮(夫婦,前坐)與子孫1980 年合影於北京。後排左起:宋克荒、曹曉春、宋米勒( 手抱)、宋京波、宋昭昭、宋勤、宋彬彬(抱子JinYan)。
一个中年女子前来开門,兩隻迷你小狗像一雙拖鞋一樣趴在她的腳上。這個磚瓦結構的房子有一個精心修剪的草坪,灌木叢很好的把她家和鄰居區分開來。這是一幢位於在密西根州安娜堡市郊外的富人區普通豪宅,和周圍的建築沒什麼兩樣。
宋昭昭:來自中國頂層的貴族
她就是宋昭昭,髮型簡潔,舉止文靜,現在是密西根大學醫院工作,年薪八萬二千美元。她和她的美國先生Alan住在這棟房子裡,她先生為福特汽車工作。儘管看起來她是個普通的美國中產階級,但她和她的兄弟姐妹是位於中國頂層的“貴族”。
他們的父親宋任窮是开国上将,一九六八年失寵前一直是中共高級官員。宋昭昭十幾歲時她的父母被下放到一家農場,毛死後,宋将军又回归國家領導層,被認為是中共八大元老的「八老」之一。
宋將軍的八個子女有五個居住在美國,其中三個女兒已經是美國公民,一個兒子也拿到了綠卡。美國——中國人眼中「美麗的國家」──吸引了很多中共元老的後代,宋任窮家族就是其中一個極佳的示範。
宋昭昭兄妹在美國發現了機會,不光是教育子女和自我教育的機會,他們說,還包括商業機會以及遠離文化大革命造成的混亂以及受迫害的機會。他們在這裡的生活和在中國的完全不同,在這裡他們可以隱姓埋名過簡單的生活,諷刺的是,在這裡他們的生活更接近他們的父輩所竭力“革命”的價值觀。
毛時代比褲子上的補丁誰多
宋昭昭的大哥宋克荒,一年要到美國兩次和位於加利福尼亞州歐文市的家人在一起。宋克荒說有一些和他背景類似的人,只热衷攫取財富和權力,全然忘了他們的根在哪裡,他對此感到很難過。
「在毛澤東時代由於嚴格管制根本沒有什麼特權,」宋克荒在談起上世紀五十年代到六十年代他還在上學的時候說道,「那個時候我們都比誰褲子上的補丁多,我們覺得補丁越多就越光榮。」
就在上個月,中國共產黨決定了十年一度的權力轉移,公布了新的領導班子。宋昭昭說她就是在那個時候第二次投了奧巴馬的票。
作為宋家第二代最年輕的孩子,很明顯對於記者來採訪感到不舒服。她很謙和地花了幾分鐘回答記者的問題。她說她父親並沒有告訴他們該做什麼。「父親讓我們自己做決定,」昭昭說,「他想讓我們選擇自己的生活。」
三女兒宋珍珍:我恨死了文革
彭博社研究表明,接受訪談的一百○三位紅色后人及他們的配偶,都在美國居住、工作或學習,其中有三分之一就讀過位於馬薩諸塞州為精英人士準備的預備班,進過常青藤學校,在紐約如摩根斯坦利之類的公司實習過。
傅士卓(Joseph Fewsmith),波士頓大學的一名研究中國政治精英的教授,他引用一個中國的成語說:「他們懂得“狡兔三窟”,會讓自己的資產配置多樣化,接受高等教育,以保證在有任何意外發生時他們有條後路。」
文革期間,宋家處境很不妙,在那十年中,毛澤東為了避免他的權威被挑戰,很多紅色家庭都被監禁,或者被下放到偏遠的地方。文革開始時宋昭昭才十一歲。不久,她哥哥宋克荒就被宣布為反革命,被清華大學的同學批鬥。
宋珍珍,宋任窮的三女兒,目前居住在舊金山,在接受電話訪問時,她說「我恨死文革了,所有人都是騙子,你不能相信任何人。你說了什麼話有人轉身就去告發。」
宋彬彬在美國退休後,享有麻州每年18000 美元養老金。
2003 年回國,和張玉鳳(右3)等參與紀念毛的飲宴(右2 宋)
宋彬彬十年前回國處理歷史問題
他們的二姐宋彬彬是文革期間最有名的紅衛兵,曾在一九六六年八月的天安門集會上把紅衛兵的臂章戴在毛澤東的胳膊上。也被毛澤東賜名「要武」。就在那個月,宋彬彬所在的女子精英學校(師大女附中——譯注)的紅衛兵殺害了一名教師,宋彬彬也參與其中。
宋彬彬在文革後不久就去了美國,在波士頓安了家,並在畢業後成了婚,她的丈夫是位美國公民。根據學校和州的記錄顯示,拿到麻省理工的博士學位後,她進入馬薩諸塞州政府,在州環保局從事空氣質量評測工作。
她把她的兒子Jin Yan送去菲利普安多弗中學,之後他去了斯坦福大學。
在美國待了三十多年後,現今已經六十五歲的宋彬彬,十年前回到了中國,開始處理她的歷史問題。在今年發表的一篇文章中她為自己辯解說,她曾經制止過針對她老師的攻擊。「現在我認識到,這種對生命的集體性漠視也是發生悲劇的重要原因,」她寫道,「我更期望我們的民族、我們的國家永遠不要再發生那樣的動亂和悲劇。」
在她的先生於2011年過世後,她接手了位於北京的科技公司Copia。我們向該公司發出請求希望能採訪一下宋彬彬女士,她沒有回復。
宋珍珍相信「善有善報」
居住在舊金山金門公園附近的宋珍珍當年決定遠走海外。在中國時她才十幾歲,她說她努力接受教育。因為文革,她沒有上高中,而是被下放到了東南部的一個農場。後來她在北京求學,學習計算機以及衛星圖像處理。再以后,她遇到了自己的先生陳方,此人是陳雲的兒子。和欧洲的贵族一样,這兩個中國的頂層家族通過聯姻聯繫到了一起。不過這段婚姻沒有持續多久。現在她和一個美國人同居,他們是在一次跳舞的時候認識的,她說:我相信善有善報。
大哥宋克荒:父親要求謹言慎行
宋克荒在歐文市擁有價值九十五萬美元的家,妻子兒子都是美國公民。宋克荒目前在中國南部的廣東省,在電話採訪中他說他也拿到了美國綠卡,擁有美國永久居住權。
六十七歲的宋克荒和陳元(陳雲的兒子也是現任的中國國家開發銀行董事長),一起上的北京四中。宋克荒說他們的父親在家庭灌輸這樣一種理念,不要炫耀家庭背景。
宋家還有一些成員仍然留在了中國,在國有企業中都身居高位,還成立了自己的公司。宋勤,宋家的長女,在東北經營一家奶製品公司,東北也是他們的父親管理過的地方。宋克荒管理一家房地產投資公司,在公司官網上把國開行和保利集團列為合作夥伴。國開行和保利集團曾經由另外兩位元老鄧小平、王震的親屬执掌。
據三十三歲的宋米勒(Miller Song)說,宋家的家長宋任窮教導他的後代要謹慎對待他們的關係和權力。他還是個孩子的時候就被告知絕對不允許告訴別人他家的背景。如果他爺爺開車送他上學,在幾條街外他就要下車,就為了不讓別的孩子看到汽車,宋米勒如是說。
孫子宋米勒:和陳雲家的后代一起長大
宋米勒說他到美國時十二歲,在加州上的大學。他说:「中國父母把孩子送到國外求學太正常了,因為他們相信美國可以提供更好的教育。」他從父母那裡借了一萬美元開了家公司,PatchTogether Inc。,生產塑料玩偶和個性化T恤。他說現在大部分時間都住在中國,這樣方便他和產品代工廠聯繫。
儘管宋家已經搬出了中南海大院,自毛時代這裡就是人民共和國的領導層居住地,他們仍然是那個團體的一部分。據宋克荒和宋米勒說很多家庭的成員都是在一起從小玩到大,彼此都很熟悉。
陳雲的兒子陳元把他的兩個孩子也都送到了美國上高中。此后,他的女兒陳曉丹就職於一家香港企業。2006年在巴黎舉辦的名媛舞會上,她身穿紫紅色禮服第一次踏入社交場合。據說,當天來自比利時的卑爾根達埃勒公爵埃杜瓦爾是她的舞伴。
自從父母過世後,她回國的次數日見稀少,她喜歡安娜堡的多元化和這裡的文化,她也不知道自己將來還會不會回到中國。實際上她都不願意談論中國。因為看到安娜堡的經濟和房地產復甦,因為奧巴馬終結了伊拉克戰爭,她投了奧巴馬一票。但被問及中國的政治時,她避而不答。
inShare