Dr. Mike D’Zmura- Professor & Chair, Department of Cognitive Sciences, from the University of California, Irvine and the lead scientist on the project.-"Public sale of Artificial Telepathy technology would inevitably result in the stealing of bank account numbers, PIN numbers, passwords, trade secrets, etc., which in turn would inevitably translate into actual theft. The damage to the economy could be catastrophic, and the sudden disappearance of privacy – all privacy – might literally cause society as we know it to melt down."   1998  http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~mdzmura/
Michael D'Zmura
http://www.socsci.uci.edu


Army developing “synthetic telepathy” UN Commission of Human Rights, Interpol, EU Commission of Ethics

Read This Thought: The U.S. Army is developing a technology known as synthetic telepathy that would allow someone to create email or voice mail and send it by thought alone. The concept is based on reading electrical activity in the brain using an electroencephalograph, or EEG.


By Eric Bland

Oct. 13, 2008
Vocal cords were overrated anyway. A new Army grant aims to create email or voice mail and send it by thought alone. No need to type an e-mail, dial a phone or even speak a word.
Known as synthetic telepathy, the technology is based on reading electrical activity in the brain using an electroencephalograph, or EEG. Similar technology is being marketed as a way to control video games by thought.
“I think that this will eventually become just another way of communicating,” said Mike D’Zmura, from the University of California, Irvine and the lead scientist on the project.
Artificial Telepathy machine cannot possibly be advertised and sold on the open market for obvious reasons: they would utterly destroying the privacy of many, many people. “Peeking” into the lives of others would quickly pervert itself into stalking, mind rape, privacy violation, identity theft and information theft on a massive scale.
Public sale of Artificial Telepathy technology would inevitably result in the stealing of bank account numbers, PIN numbers, passwords, trade secrets, etc., which in turn would inevitably translate into actual theft. The damage to the economy could be catastrophic, and the sudden disappearance of privacy – all privacy – might literally cause society as we know it to melt down.
For all of these reasons, Artificial Telepathy may be rightly called a “non-lethal” H-Bomb. The damage done to society by release of such technology would be nightmarish. See for example the dystopian film Strange Days(1995, starring Ralph Fiennes) in which dream thieves use a technology called “SQUID” to jack into the minds of people, record their experiences, and sell those experiences on disc:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_Days_(film)
See also the film “Artificial Telepathy” (Dir. Mitchell Cox), from which the movie poster (above) is taken:
http://homepage.eircom.net/~visualaffects/vault/details/15196.html
No one would die as a direct result of the Artificial Telepathy’s use. It is a “non-lethal weapon.”
But nothing would ever be the same again.
Most scientists and lawyers understand this. Indeed, if the maker of an Artificial Telepathy weapon tried to sell the product on the open market, the number of people who would line up to sue that manufacturer would probably circle the Earth.
Third in line would be a lawyer representing every voice-hearer and human rights advocate in the Western hemisphere. That’s a large number of people.
Second in line would be a lawyer bringing a massive class-action suit joined by every paranoid corporation that has a trade secret to hide. That is, almost every corporation in the world.
First in line would be the United States government. Every copy of the machine, its blueprints, and its patent documents, would be immediately seized and locked away on the grounds of national security.
The military reasons for grabbing up this technology and suppressing it are obvious: With Artificial Telepathy, there is no such thing as a surprise attack. And without the element of surprise, war becomes impossible. Artificial Telepathy machines could potentially put every single G.I. Joe at the DOD out of work. And as far as the Department of Defense is concerned, any technology that puts them out of work is a weapon of mass destruction.
Even if it doesn’t kill anyone. (But IT DOES KILL)
Translation: No one gets one of these weapons but Uncle Sam. The United States Department of Defense has no objections to weapons of mass destruction. It just objects to anyone else owning one.
Although any government would strictly forbid public ownership of such technology, every government would certainly want to use the Artificial Telepathy machine itself. Far from destroying such a weapon, most military service branches would probably compete for possession of one, as would every law enforcement organization and every intelligence agency under the sun. Some would argue that the machine ought to be destroyed, but others would find that the lure of knowing exactly what the “enemy” is thinking is far too intoxicating to pass up.
An Artificial Telepathy weapon is, after all, a spy agency’s dream.
Conclusion: If or (more properly) when an Artificial Telepathy machine is developed, it will certainly be classified as a weapon – specifically a “Non-Lethal Weapon.” It will never be released on the public market. The public will be given no clue that it exists, and the military branches of different countries will fight fiercely among themselves for possession of this cool new toy.
Within the U.S. military branches, the Army, Air Force, Navy and Marines will probably squabble with the intelligence community, law enforcement and the Department of Justice for possession and control, then finally settle on a scheme for sharing control among themselves. Most likely they will combine forces (and budgets) to build and manage new weapons based on the first Artificial Telepathy technology. If the weapons work, everyone will claim to be the proud Papa. If the cover is blown, and Congress launches a massive investigation, the program will be orphaned. Everyone can back off and point fingers at each other.
Joining forces means everyone wins, and nobody is to blame.
Given this conclusion, we can now ask ourselves a simple question: Where would the military hide its deep-black research program into Artificial Telepathy, if such technology exists?
Answer: They would hide Artificial Telepathy under cover of a Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Program.


“It will take a lot of research, and a lot of time, but there are also a lot of commercial applications, not just military applications,” he said.
The idea of communicating by thought alone is not a new one. In the 1960s, a researcher strapped an EEG to his head and, with some training, could stop and start his brain’s alpha waves to compose Morse code messages.
Michael D'Zmura
Professor & Chair, Department of Cognitive Sciences
University of California, Irvine

Contact information
Social Sciences Plaza B 3219
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, California 92697-5100 USA
+1-949-824-2969 (phone) -2307 (fax)
mdzmura@uci.edu
Education
B.A., Harvard College, Cambridge, MA (1979, German Studies)
M.A., University of Rochester, Rochester, NY (1986, Psychology)
Ph.D., University of Rochester, Rochester, NY (1990, Psychology)
Professional positions
Chair of Cognitive Sciences, UC Irvine, 2005-present
Professor of Cognitive Sciences, UC Irvine, 1998-present
Visiting Professor, University Jean Monnet in St.-Etienne, 1995/96, 1997
Associate Professor of Cognitive Sciences, UC Irvine, 1994-98
Assistant Professor of Cognitive Sciences, UC Irvine, 1990-94
Fellowships and honors
American Psychological Assocation Distinguished Scientific Award
for Early Career Contribution to Psychology, 1998/99
Deutsche Akademischer Austauschdienst Scholarship, 1997
Bourse d'Accueil Fellowship, Region Rhone-Alpes, France, 1995/96
Society for Mathematical Psychology, New Investigator Award, 1993
IBM Graduate Student Fellowship, 1985-87
NEI-ARVO Young Investigators Travel Fellowship, 1984
Research interests
Vision, hearing, language, attention, brain imaging, and brain-computer interfaces
Publications
D'Zmura, M. & Lennie, P. (1986). Shared pathways for rod and cone vision. Vision Research 26, 1273-1280. [PubMed], [PDF]
D'Zmura, M. & Lennie, P. (1986). Mechanisms of color constancy. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 3, 1662-1672. [PDF]
Lennie, P. & D'Zmura, M. (1988). Mechanisms of color vision. Critical Reviews in Neurobiology 3, 333-400. [PubMed]
D'Zmura, M. (1991). Color in visual search. Vision Research 31, 951-966. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M. (1991). Shading ambiguity: reflectance and illumination. In Computational Models of Visual Processing, Landy, M.S. and Movshon, A.J. (Eds.) Cambridge: MIT, 187-207.
D'Zmura, M. (1992). Color constancy: surface color from changing illumination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 9, 490-493. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M. & Iverson, G. (1992). Color constancy: adaptation to the illumination environment. Optical Society of America topical Meeting on Advances in Color Vision Technical Digest, 107-109.
Kakarala, R., Bennett, B., Iverson, G.J. & D'Zmura, M. (1993). Bispectral techniques for spherical functions. Proceedings of the IEEE Int'l Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Minneapolis, IV, 216-220. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M. & Iverson, G. (1993). Color constancy. I. Basic theory of two-stage linear recovery of spectral descriptions for lights and surfaces. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 10, 2148-2165. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M. & Iverson, G. (1993). Color constancy. II. Results for two-stage linear recovery of spectral descriptions for lights and surfaces. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 10, 2166-2180. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M. & Iverson, G. (1994). Color constancy. III. General linear recovery of spectral descriptions for lights and surfaces. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 11, 2389-2400. [PDF]
Iverson, G. & D'Zmura, M. (1994). Criteria for color constancy in trichromatic bilinear models. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 11, 1970-1975. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M. & Mangalick, A. (1994). Detection of contrary chromatic change. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 11, 543-546. [PDF]
Singer, B. & D'Zmura, M. (1994). Color contrast induction. Vision Research 34, 3111-3126. [PDF]
Singer, B. & D'Zmura, M. (1995). Contrast gain control. A bilinear model for chromatic selectivity. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 12, 667-685. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M., Iverson, G. & Singer, B. (1995). Probabilistic color constancy. In Luce, R.D., D'Zmura, M., Hoffman, D.D., Iverson, G. and Romney, K. (Eds.), Geometric Representations of Perceptual Phenomena. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 187-202.
Iverson, G. & D'Zmura, M. (1995). Color constancy: spectral recovery using trichromatic bilinear models. In Luce, R.D., D'Zmura, M., Hoffman, D.D., Iverson, G. and Romney, K. (Eds.), Geometric Representations of Perceptual Phenomena. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 169-185.
Luce, R.D., D'Zmura, M., Hoffman, D.D., Iverson, G. and Romney, K., Eds. (1995) Geometric Representations of Perceptual Phenomena. Articles in Honor of Tarow Indow's 70th Birthday. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
D'Zmura, M. & Singer, B. (1996). The spatial pooling of contrast in contrast gain control. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 13, 2135-2140. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M. (1996). Bergmann on visual resolution, Perception 25, 1223-1234, translation of Bergmann, C., Anatomisches und Physiologisches ueber die Netzhaut des Auges. Zeitschrift fuer rationelle Medicin II, 1857,83-108.
D'Zmura, M., Colantoni, P., Knoblauch, K. & Laget, B. (1997). Color transparency. Perception 26, 471-492. [ PubMed]
D'Zmura, M., Lennie, P. & Tiana, C. (1997). Color search and visual field segregation. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 381-388. [ PubMed]
D'Zmura, M. (1997). Neural network for color contrast gain control. Proceedings of the European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges, Belgium, April 1997, pp. 67-72.
Colantoni, P., D'Zmura, M., Knoblauch, K. & Laget, B. (1997) Detection of color transparency. In Rogowitz, B. & Allenbach, J. (Eds.) Human Vision and Electronic Imaging II, Vol. 3016, 360-368.
D'Zmura, M. & Knoblauch, K. (1998) Spectral bandwidths for the detection of color. Vision Research 38, 3117-3128. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M., Knoblauch, K., Henaff, M.-A. & Michel, F. (1998) Dependence of color on context in a case of cortical color vision deficiency. Vision Research 38, 3455-3459. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M. & Iverson, G. (1998). A formal approach to color constancy: the recovery of surface and light source spectral properties using bilinear models. In Dowling, C., Roberts, F. and Theuns, P. (Eds.) Recent Progress in Mathematical Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 99-132.
D'Zmura, M. (1998). Color contrast gain control. In Backhaus, W., Kliegl, R. & Werner, J. (Eds.) Color Vision. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 251-266.
Chen, V.J. & D'Zmura, M. (1998), Test of a convergence model for color transparency perception. Perception 27, 595-608. [ PubMed]
D'Zmura, M. & Singer, B. (1999) Contrast gain control. In Sharpe, L.T. & Gegenfurtner, K.R. (Eds.) Color Vision: From Genes to Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 369-385.
Hagedorn, J. & D'Zmura, M. (2000). Color appearance of surfaces viewed through fog. Perception 29, 1169-1184. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M., Rinner, O. & Gegenfurtner, K.R. (2000). The colors seen behind transparent filters. Perception 29, 911-926. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M., Colantoni, P. & Seyranian, G.D. (2000). Visualization of events from arbitrary spacetime perspectives. In Erbacher, R.F., Chen, P.C., Roberts, J.C. & Wittenbrink, C.M. (Eds.) Visual Data Exploration and Analysis VII 3860, 35-40. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M., Colantoni, P. & Hagedorn, J. (2001) Perception of color change. Color Research and Application S26, S186-S191. [PDF]
D'Zmura, M., Colantoni, P. & Seyranian, G. (2001). Virtual environments with four or more spatial dimensions. Presence 9, 616-631. [PDF]
Knoblauch, K. & D'Zmura, M. (2001). Lights and neural responses do not depend on choice of color space. Vision Research 41, 1683-1684.
D'Zmura, M. (2002). Psychology of colour perception. In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. London: MacMillan.
D'Zmura, M. (2003). Color and the processing of chromatic information. In Mausfeld, R. and Heyer, R. (Eds.), Colour Perception: From Light to Object, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 143-152.
Ge, M. & D'Zmura, M. (2003). 4D structure from motion: a computational algorithm. Bouman, C.A. & Stevenson, R.L. (Eds.) Computational Imaging (Proc. SPIE/IS&T) 5016, 13-23. [PDF]
Ge,M. & D'Zmura, M. (submitted). Recovery of structure from motion in four or more dimensions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology.
Ge,M. & D'Zmura, M. (submitted). A hybrid model for color transparency perception. Journal of Vision.
Links
Cognitive NeuroSystems Lab

http://archive.org/details/alanstein041207

src="/images/glogo.png"/>

Web Moving Images Texts Audio Software Patron Info About IA Projects

Listen to audio

Run time: 15:27

Stream (help)

128kbps M3U (Hi-Fi)
64kbps M3U (Lo-Fi)

Play / Download (help)

(7.1 M)ZIP

Ogg Vorbis

·
AlanStein041207

All Files: HTTP

>

Resources

Bookmark

Please "SAVE AS" and share globally- My testimony of being tortured for learning Aramark had foodservice in world trade center 1, world trade center II, foodservice at the UN in New York City and foodservice in the Pentagon.foodservice in the White House.<br>

directed energy weapons and psychotronic weapons has been listed as weapons of Mass Destruction by UNIDIR-UN http://unidir.org/pdf/ouvrages/pdf-1-92-9045-002-2-en.pdf directed energy weapons used in florida- for decades- TITLE 18 > PART I >... CHAPTER 113B > § 2332h
... ... Prev | Next
§ 2332h. Radiological dispersal devices
(3) Special circumstances....—... If the death of another results from a person’s violation of subsection (a), the person shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and punished by imprisonment for life http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/118/2441
18 U.S.C. § 2441 : US Code - Section 2441: War crimes
...
(a) Offense. - Whoever, whether inside or outside the United
States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described
in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
for life https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=103345603021149&set=a.101415416547501.3004.100000371299469&type=1

A drug called GHB in there.. BZ is 100 times more potent than LSD and is a miltary drug- sprayed from the air, added into food, added into water.. rations MRE's military food, nuring home food. see the evil Melbrook NEW YORK- The same time fluoride is added to the water it can be put into the municipal water supplies of the USA. BZ is 100 times more powerful than LSD. TEST FOR IT IN HAIR-LSD TORTURE OF A HOUSE WIFE IN Los Angeles Veterans HOSP.ITAL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxsbCFOu7b4&feature=related BZ is 100 times more powerful than LSD- This is BZ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3-Quinuclidinyl_benzilate 3-quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB, BZ, EA-2277), IUPAC name 1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]Oct-3-yl α-hydroxy-α-phenylbenzeneacetate, is an odorless military incapacitating agent.[1] Its NATO code is BZ. The Iraqi incapacitating agent Agent 15 is believed either to be the same as or similar to BZ

Senator Glenn "You just think about your family, your own son, your own daughter, or grandchildren who might be, the next time they got to a doctor, the subject of some medical experiment that they are not even told about." Senator Glenn's Statement floor U.S. Senate http://www.unwittingvictim.com/BioEthics.html

Attention- Torture- The Funkbildradar Satellite Radar Weapon- Please No To Funkbildrarture- Global Weapon and a weapon of mass destruction dar Sateliten Radarwaffen Actung ! Folter ! Bitte nein Folter- Globale Waffenforshung Menschenversklavung Kornkurrenzmord- Weapons of Mass Destruction- Non Lethal Weapons, Mind Control Weapons, or psychotronic weapons has been listed as weapons of Mass Destruction by UNIDIR-UN http://unidir.org/pdf/ouvrages/pdf-1-92-9045-002-2-en.pdf

Inverness child labor cotton mill- USA   How the Irish Became White. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall, September 1995. ISBN: 0-415-91384-5    Maybe if on all the Martin Luther King steets you could remind all the racism rising in  America of the fact the Irish were enslaved- and add the name Daniel O'Connell Street to all those streets so as to remind the USA and world that there was a huge labor injustice against Irish and other Immigrants and that child labor laws were non existent- and the abuse of children as slaves was taking place in the USA up until 1920    http://freemanireland.ning.com/profiles/blogs/inverness-child-labor-cotton-mill-usa-how-the-irish-became-white
<br/>

<br/>
A Book:<p>Noel Ignatiev, How the Irish Became White.<br/>
New York: Routledge, Chapman &amp; Hall, September 1995.<br/>
ISBN: 0-415-91384-5</p>
<p>A Review:</p>
<p>The Boston Globe, November 7, 1995<br/>
"The Irish, the Blacks and the Struggle with Racism,"<br/>
by Elijah Wald, Globe Correspondent Reactions of Irish America to the 1841 appeal made to them by Daniel O'Connell, The Liberator, to join with anti-slavery forces in the USA. <a href="http://www.afn.org/~dks/race/wald-ignatiev.html">http://www.afn.org/~dks/race/wald-ignatiev.html</a></p>;

International Criminal Court and the Protection of Witnesses and Victims of torture Globally- "The Rome Statute" rome_statute(e).pdf, 1 MB

Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court*
* Text of the Rome Statute circulated as document A/CONF.183/9 of 17 July 1998 and corrected by procès-verbaux of 10 November
1998, 12 July 1999, 30 November 1999, 8 May 2000, 17 January 2001 and 16 January 2002. The Statute entered into force on 1 July
2002.

Article 1
The Court
An International Criminal Court (“the Court”) is hereby established. It shall be a

permanent institution and shall have the power to exercise its jurisdiction over persons for the
most serious crimes of international concern, as referred to in this Statute, and shall be
complementary to national criminal jurisdictions. The jurisdiction and functioning of the Court
shall be governed by the provisions of this Statute. Article 2
Relationship of the Court with the United Nations
The Court shall be brought into relationship with the United Nations through an agreement
to be approved by the Assembly of States Parties to this Statute and thereafter concluded by the
President of the Court on its behalf.
Article 3

Seat of the Court
1. The seat of the Court shall be established at The Hague in the Netherlands (“the host
State”).
2. The Court shall enter into a headquarters agreement with the host State, to be approved by
the Assembly of States Parties and thereafter concluded by the President of the Court on its behalf.
3. The Court may sit elsewhere, whenever it considers it desirable, as provided in this
Statute.
Article 4
Legal status and powers of the Court

1. The Court shall have international legal personality. It shall also have such legal capacity
as may be necessary for the exercise of its functions and the fulfilment of its purposes.
2. The Court may exercise its functions and powers, as provided in this Statute, on the
territory of any State Party and, by special agreement, on the territory of any other State.
PART 2. JURISDICTION, ADMISSIBILITY AND APPLICABLE LAW
Article 5
Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court
1. The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the
international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute

with respect to the following crimes:
(a) The crime of genocide;
(b) Crimes against humanity;
(c) War crimes;
(d) The crime of aggression.
2. The Court shall exercise jurisdiction over the crime of aggression once a provision is
adopted in accordance with articles 121 and 123 defining the crime and setting out the conditions
under which the Court shall exercise jurisdiction with respect to this crime. Such a provision shall
be consistent with the relevant provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.

Article 6
Genocide
For the purpose of this Statute, “genocide” means any of the following acts committed
with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its
physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Article 7
Crimes against humanity
1. For the purpose of this Statute, “crime against humanity” means any of the following acts
when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian
population, with knowledge of the attack:
(a) Murder;
(b) Extermination;
(c) Enslavement;

(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of
fundamental rules of international law;
(f) Torture;
(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced
sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial,
national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are
universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act

referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;
(j) The crime of apartheid;
(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or
serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:
(a) “Attack directed against any civilian population” means a course of conduct
involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian
population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;

(b) “Extermination” includes the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia
the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of
a population;
(c) “Enslavement” means the exercise of any or all of the powers attaching to the right
of ownership over a person and includes the exercise of such power in the course of trafficking in
persons, in particular women and children;
(d) “Deportation or forcible transfer of population” means forced displacement of the
persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully
present, without grounds permitted under international law;

(e) “Torture” means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether
physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that
torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful
sanctions;
(f) “Forced pregnancy” means the unlawful confinement of a woman forcibly made
pregnant, with the intent of affecting the ethnic composition of any population or carrying out
other grave violations of international law. This definition shall not in any way be interpreted as
affecting national laws relating to pregnancy;
(g) “Persecution” means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights

contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity;
(h) “The crime of apartheid” means inhumane acts of a character similar to those
referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic
oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and
committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;
(i) “Enforced disappearance of persons” means the arrest, detention or abduction of
persons by, or with the authorization, support or acquiescence of, a State or a political
organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge that deprivation of freedom or to give
information on the fate or whereabouts of those persons, with the intention of removing them

from the protection of the law for a prolonged period of time.
3. For the purpose of this Statute, it is understood that the term “gender” refers to the two
sexes, male and female, within the context of society. The term “gender” does not indicate any
meaning different from the above.
Article 8
War crimes
1. The Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in particular when committed as
part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes.
2. For the purpose of this Statute, “war crimes” means:

(a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the
following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva
Convention:
(i) Wilful killing;
(ii) Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;
(iii) Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health;
(iv) Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by
military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly;
(v) Compelling a prisoner of war or other protected person to serve in the

forces of a hostile Power;
(vi) Wilfully depriving a prisoner of war or other protected person of the rights
of fair and regular trial;

http://thebulletin.org/web-edition/op-eds/outlaw-nonconsensual-human-experiments-now   Outlaw nonconsensual human experiments now

By Cheryl Welsh | 16 June 2009

About 15 years ago, a reporter at the Albuquerque Tribune discovered evidence that during the Cold War, the U.S. government carried out radiation experiments on U.S. citizens without their knowledge or consent, all under the shadow of classified research. When the story hit the newswires, the U.S. public was outraged. President Bill Clinton responded by establishing the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE), calling on it to review Washington's past actions and recommend steps that would prevent such heinous human experiments from ever taking place again.

http://thebulletin.org/web-edition/op-eds/outlaw-nonconsensual-human-experiments-now  They already are ILLEGAL and hence outlawed- This law would ...not exist if the weapons did not exist- TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > §2332h
§ 2332h. Radiological dispersal devices
(3) Special circumstances.— If the death of another results from a person’s violation of subsection (a), the person shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and punished by imprisonment for life.- Star wars and HAARP... are in In violation of US Federal Public Law- Pub. L. No. 85-568, 72 Stat. 426-438 (Jul. 29, 1958)
http://history.nasa.gov/spaceact-legishistory.pdf If you watch one documentary from the Scientists and military personal... that warned us of weather weapons, ELF waves, plate techtonic earthquake radiation and the threat of global mind control with supercomputers- watch this- This law would ...not exist if the weapons did not exist- TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > §2332h
§ 2332h. Radiological dispersal devices
(3) Special circumstances.— If the death of another results from a person’s violation of subsection (a), the person shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and punished by imprisonment for life. Weapons of Mass Destruction- Non Lethal Weapons, Mind Control Weapons, or psychotronic weapons has been listed as weapons of Mass Destruction by UNIDIR-UN http://unidir.org/pdf/ouvrages/pdf-1-92-9045-002-2-en.pdf

US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights Violations and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons- 2006 Very Important PDF from Sanoma University in California By Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton. You will have to hit save as once the PDF is open and print from a pdf application this 48 page document US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights Violations and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons- 2006 Please download and print the entire document. It has all information of the chemtrials, weather modification, directed energy as well as the projects Tesla worked on in 1908 inside the USA- such as moving the earth distance from the sun to change climate.

Report on TETRA Strictly for the Police Federation of England and Wales B TROWER http://www.tetrawatch.net/papers/trower_report.pdf WHAT IS BELIEVED TO HAPPEN AS THESE WAVES ENTER OUR BODIES? I will try to summarize the thousand or so research papers written over ...the last 20 or so years and explain or summarize what happens when the electric and magnetic part of the wav.e goes into our bodies. We being water based animals act like aerials to these waves. As the waves go into our bodies an electric current is generated inside our bodies which is how aerials work; waves come in and electricity is generated. The electricity generated in our bodies like all electric currents goes to ground through our bodies and like all electric currents it takes the path of least resistance. Unfortunately the path of least resistance through our bodies, although only representing 10% of our pathways, carries 90% of our traffic rather like the M1 motorway. The traffic in our bodies, namely hormones, antibodies, neurotransmitters know where they are going because they also carry an electric charge. The hormones, antibodies and neurotransmitters know where to "get off" because there is a corresponding opposite charge at the site of delivery rather like the positive and negative ends of a battery. The problem is if you have an electric current passing through the body it can change this charge, either on the hormones, antibodies or neurotransmitters or the site of delivery.See More Confidential Report on TETRA Strictly for the Police Federation of England and Wales B TROWER www.tetrawatch.net/papers/trower_report.pdf INTRODUCTION ... With respect to my fellow scientists I shall be writing this report in non-scientific speak for all of those readers who have not had the benefit of a scientific education. WHAT IS ALL THIS REALLY ABOUT? Imagine the field around a magnet and imagine ordinary everyday static electricity. If you put the force field from the magnet with the force field from the static electricity you make a wave. This wave is called an electromagnetic wave. There are lots of different types of electromagnetic waves but they are all made of the same two things – magnetic and static. The only difference between the waves is their wavelength or the length of the wave and the number of waves that can be produced a second, i.e. the frequency. All of these waves are put into a table called the electromagnetic spectrum. At one end of this electromagnetic spectrum you have the very short waves, namely gamma rays and x-rays and at the other end of the spectrum you have the very long ways, namely radio, TV and waves from overhead power cables. All of these waves have the same properties; that is to say they all behave the same. They can all be reflected, refracted, and they all travel at the same speed, which is the speed of light. For interest, if you were one wave of light you would be able to travel around the world nearly seven times every second; that is the speed of light. The electromagnetic spectrum is ordered so that at the short wave end you have the gamma rays, x-rays, ultra-violet, visible light, infra red, microwaves, radar, TV and radio in that order. The ultra-violet and above are known as ionising waves and there is no argument as to the damage they can cause when entering the body. Below ultraviolet is said to be non-ionising and this is where arguments occur between scientists as to whether damage can occur inside the human body through exposure to these waves. The microwaves used in the TETRA system are in the non-ionising section of the electromagnetic spectrum and I will be discussing the arguments concerning microwaves and health in this report.

Violation of Federal US Law. TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > § 2332h

§ 2332h. Radiological dispersal devices
(3) Special circumstances.— If the death of another results... from a person’s violation of subsect...ion (a), the person shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and punished by imprisonment for life Weapons of Mass Destruction- Non Lethal Weapons, Mind Control Weapons, or psychotronic weapons has been listed as weapons of Mass Destruction by UNIDIR-UN http://unidir.org/pdf/ouvrages/pdf-1-92-9045-002-2-en.pdf

The dollar store in Berkley California summer of 2007- After Church I went to buy some toothpaste- and then- threw it away- Colgate is owned by Proctor and Gamble. and Prescott Bush and Cheney are tied to Proctor and Gamble-    internet poison toothpaste new york- the toothpaste killed people in 2006 in new york, ohio, mihigan, parts of Ontario Canada, Vermont, New Hampshire, California,  Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, http://www.xap.ch/de/a.htm?cx=partner-pub-2297432634816385%3Awojyie-cw19&cof=FORID%3A10&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=poison+toothpaste+new+york&sa=Suche&siteurl=www.xap.ch%2Fde%2Findex.html&ref= 

FEDERAL LAW- Star Wars was and is Illegal- based on this Federal Public Law- Pub. L. No. 85-568,
72 Stat. 426-438 (Jul. 29, 1958)

http://history.nasa.gov/spaceact-legishistory.pdf

AN ACT
...
To provide for research into problems of flight within and outside the earth's atmosphere,
and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America
in Congress assembled,
TITLE I-SHORT TITLE, DECLARATION OF POLICY, AND DEFINITIONS
SHORT TITLE
Sec. 101. This Act may be cited as the “National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958”.
DECLARATION OF POLICY AND PURPOSE Sec. 102.
(a) The Congress hereby declares that it is the policy of the United States that
activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.
(b) The Congress declares that the general welfare and security of the United States requirethat adequate provision be made for aeronautical and space activities. The Congress further declares that such activities shall be the responsibility of, and shall be directed by, a civilian agency exercising control over aeronautical and space activities sponsored by the United States,
except that activities peculiar to or primarily associated with the development of weapons systems, military operations, or the defense of the United States (including the research and development necessary to make effective provision for the defense of the United States) shall be the responsibility of, and shall be directed by, the Department of Defense; and that
determination as to which such agency has responsibility for and direction of any such activity
shall be made by the President in conformity with section 2471(e).

An International injunction has been written and filed- finally- Mireille Torjman hereby brings this action for injunction relief and damages based on personal knowledge and belief, as a victim and expert witness, to the information provided, as to all other matters, as to which allegations Plaintiff, without doubt or delusion, will provide proof, unrefuted
evidence, overwhelming evidentiary support, witnesses,... substantial facts, research, and investigation
that exists as follows:

http://www.archive.org/details/NsaTransmissionsElfMindControlCancerCorruptions_4

Keywords: Mireille Torjman, NSA Transmissions, Warfare on Civilians, Cancer, Crimes of Humanity,
Torture, 911, Shadow Government Corruptions
Year: 2010 http://www.archive.org/details/NsaTransmissionsElfMindControlCancerCorruptions_4

Weapons of Mass Destruction- Non Lethal Weapons, Mind Control Weapons, or psychotronic weapons has been listed as weapons of Mass Destruction by UNIDIR-UN http://unidir.org/pdf/ouvrages/pdf-1-92-9045-002-2-en.pdf

UC Berkeley- Calcium Ion signaling and the human immune system- 1991

03ELF and Calcium COVER Page effects on immune system.pdf, 39 KB

• Electromagneticeffectonimmunesystem.PDF, 1.9 MB
• 06_MK ULTRA TORTURE.pdf, 93 KB 01__NSA_FT_MEADE.pdf, 124 KB
• Larson Report Edit.pdf, 1.4 MB
• MKULTRACIA.jpg, 68 KB