Subject: Stop the shooting use Tin Foil,
Do not let anyone tell you that this does not work, I use it every day, I can now work at a job, and sleep at night. Roll it out into a blanket form and tape it together to make a 6'by 8' sheet. You can then use a Colman Emergency Blanket and tape or glue that to the foil. You can use as many layers as needed, at less three lays. Stops allot of the shooting and messes with their thermal imaging. Now they can use something else to locate you in the home, but does help allot. Still working on that issue. Make a small one for your lower body and stop having to go to the restroom so much. Big help there. do not try and contact me because law enforcement reads all my e-mails and deletes all real victims. remember all or most Organized stalking is law enforcement that is why no one is prosecuted in court. Look up the department of justice and you will find the answers to gang stalking. that is why there are so many cops, firemen, state workers, ect. involved. remember never hit any of them you go to jail and they walk. good luck
All Posts (12217)
Sort by
How many people are involved in electronic harassment vs gang stalking? Are there more people involved in electronic harassment or gang stalking? A lot of the people that know me have turned on me and are involved in my harassment. I hope all of the people that are doing this to me get arrested and I hope all of the people that have turned their backs on me also get arrested. I thought the people that I know were my friends but in all actuality they never were my friends.
Committee Against Torture Agenda: the use of Non Lethal Weapons in Canada and charges against torturers will be heard at UN
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cat/cats48.htm
We must understand what kinds of crimes they commit when using Non Lethal Weapons ( Mind Control Weapons) to torture civilians according to the international laws and tools.
1.The Law of War by NATO
Science & Technology Committee of NATO regarding the use of non lethal weapons against civilians
Discussions on the use of "non-lethal" weapons in situations involving riot-control, hostage-rescue, peacekeeping and peace-enforcement operations, as well as in traditional warfare situations, have so far focused mainly on the technology and engagement doctrine of these new weapons - see the Assembly's report "Non-Lethal Weapons" by Lord Lyell, General Rapporteur [AP 238 STC (97) 8]. The ICRC experts have studied both the effects of "non-lethal" weapons on health and how they would be used in the light of international humanitarian laws. According to their conclusions, presented by Dr. Robin Coupland, all references to "lethal" or "non-lethal" oversimplify the effects of weapons and are therefore misleading. The so-called "non-lethal" weapons (such as infrasound, electromagnetic waves or sticky foams) can indeed have severe effects on health depending on the circumstances in which they are deployed or on their possible combination with existing conventional weapons. According to ICRC, the military use of "non-lethal" weapons against civilians could undermine the existing norms of international law pertaining to armed conflict as well as the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention and the 1925 Geneva Protocol. The organization recommended that current efforts to integrate "non-lethal" weapons into operations of armed forces should address more properly the legal, health and tactical implications of doing so.
2. The International Humanitarian Law by ICRC
In the on-going debate about emerging technologies which are to be used as so-called "non-lethal weapons" it has proven not only useful but necessary to address questions related to the rules pertinent to international humanitarian law, also called the law of war. A number of questions in this field have been discussed over the last years but the correct understanding and implementation of these rules with regard to "non-lethal weapons" has shown many times to be more complex than expected. The law of war contains obligations and in this sense it goes much further than just addressing ethical, moral or even public opinion issues.
Our paper would address the legal obligations which are contained in the law of war and which are pertinent to "non-lethal weapons", in particular when they are developed for use in times of armed conflicts, including military operations other than war or military operations in urban terrain. The basic principles of the law of war and existing treaties which restrict or prohibits some "non-lethal weapons" will also be mentioned. In the law of war there is also an obligation to carry out legal reviews in a multidisciplinary approach which is very much relevant to emerging technologies since often their wounding effect is not known.
Finally it is also the intent to present findings about the wounding mechanisms and the effects on humans of currently used weapons in most of the conflicts. This would help putting the term "non-lethal" in a more realistic perspective, in particular compared to other weapons, so-called conventional "lethal" weapons.
3. Torture by Amnesty International and UN
Amnesty International continues to be concerned by the use of less-than-lethal weapons, particularly Conducted Energy Devices (CEDs) such as TASERS. Some of these weapons pose a potential risk of resulting in torture or ill-treatment when used. UN states: Torture is a crime under international law. According to all relevant instruments, it is absolutely prohibited and cannot be justified under any circumstances
4. Crimes Against Humanity by ICC
“Torture is a crime against humanity”From: American Nongovernmental Organization Coalition for the International Criminal Court
In certain cases, systematic torture of a particular group will allow the criminal defense attorney to use additional international mechanisms, such as the International Criminal Court (ICC). Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in December of 1948, includes "acting with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group [by] causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group" as part of its definition of genocide. [4]
The Rome Statute of the ICC incorporates this definition of genocide as well as a definition of crimes against humanity, which includes torture. As soon as a State becomes a party to the Statute, it accepts the ICC's jurisdiction with respect to those crimes, and a State can recommend individual nationals suspected of those crimes to the Court. The ICC will then have complete jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute unless the person recommended has already been tried or is in the process of going to trial in the State already.
We are concerned here with reinforcing in the strongest possible terms:
i) The need for such abuses to human rights and the threats to democracy to be called to consciousness, and without further delay.
ii) To analyse the reasons why people might defend themselves from becoming conscious of the existence of such threats.
iii) To address the urgent need for intelligence, imagination, and information - not to mention compassion - in dealing with the victims of persecution from this technology, and
iv) To alert a sleeping society, to the imminent threats to their freedom from the threat from fascist and covert operations who have in all probability gained control of potentially lethal weaponry of the type we are describing.
It is necessary to emphasise that at present there is not even the means for victims to gain medical attention for the effects of radiation from this targeting. Denied the respect of credulity of being used as human guinea pigs, driven to suicide by the breakdown of their lives, they are treated as insane – at best regarded as ‘sad cases’. Since the presence of a permanent ‘other’ in one’s mind and body is by definition an act of the most intolerable cruelty, people who are forced to bear it but who refuse to be broken by it, have no other option than to turn themselves into activists, their lives consumed by the battle against such atrocities, their energies directed to alerting and informing the public of things they don’t want to hear or understand about evil forces at work in their society.
It is necessary, at this point, to briefly outline a few – one might say the precious few – attempts by public servants to verify the existence and dangers inherent in this field:
- In January 1998, an annual public meeting of the French National Bioethics Committee was held in Paris. Its chairman, Jean-Pierre Changeux, a neuroscientist at the Institut Pasteur in Paris, told the meeting that “advances in cerebral imaging make the scope for invasion of privacy immense. Although the equipment needed is still highly specialized, it will become commonplace and capable of being used at a distance. That will open the way for abuses such as invasion of personal liberty, control of behaviour and brainwashing. These are far from being science-fiction concerns…and constitute “a serious risk to society.” (“Nature.” Vol 391, 1998.
- In January 1999, the European Parliament passed a resolution where it calls “ for an international convention introducing a global ban on all development and deployment of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings. It is our conviction that this ban can not be implemented without the global pressure of the informed general public on the governments. Our major objective is to get across to the general public the real threat which these weapons represent for human rights and democracy and to apply pressure on the governments and parliaments around the world to enact legislature which would prohibit the use of these devices to both government and private organisations as well as individuals.” (Plenary sessions/Europarliament, 1999)
- In October 2001, Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich introduced a bill to the House of Representatives which, it was hoped would be extremely important in the fight to expose and stop psycho-electronic mind control experimentation on involuntary, non-consensual citizens. The Bill was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services and International Relations. In the original bill a ban was sought on ‘exotic weapons’ including electronic, psychotronic or information weapons, chemtrails, particle beams, plasmas, electromagnetic radiation, extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation, or mind control technologies. Despite the inclusion of a prohibition of the basing of weapons in space, and the use of weapons to destroy objects or damage objects in space, there is no mention in the revised bill of any of the aforementioned mind-invasive weaponry, nor of the use of satellite or radar or other energy based technology for deploying or developing technology designed for deployment against the minds of human beings. (Space Preservation Act, 2002)
http://www.uwe.ac.uk/hlss/research/cpss/Journal_Psycho-Social_Studies/v2-2/SmithC.shtml
ive been a victim for probaly most of my life though most of it i put down to coincedence but about five years ago a few certain events opened my eyes i was working for a towtruck company and while i was driving i would always start thinking about politics then pretty soon it seemed everybody that got in my truck had a political opinion the wierd thing was when the conversation started to turn agressive my boss would call and ask if everything was all right without fail. i thought spying was illegal i never confronted him because i always got a feeling that every thing was all right. then everyone around me would start commenting on my thoughts and wanting to know what i thought of them even now i thought this must be some kind of hallucination i used to always try to give advice to people and one of the girls said thats why they gave me bit im not sure what bit is but since then my vision has changed dramaticlyits like i have a computer screen in my head and for about 4 years ive been in a constant struggle with these voices in my head constantly flashing images of every absurd thing you can think of including child porn and incest part of my torture has been racial and religious someone constantly yelling nigger or god dam and for years tried to get me to sell my soul for success there excuse is always that were setting an example for the world to follow but how is torturing setting an example my health has been hugely affected they try to deny me medical attention wich most times works this is the first time iv shared this with any one and i think i have a lead on who it is this is just a rough over view ive left out most of the details but hopefully as i get used to opening up the writing will become easier i never thought so many people were affected
Mosquito Devices!!
http://ning.it/I0TBsW
Canada: BCCLA calls on School Board to throw out rights violating devices
The B.C. Civil Liberties Association is insisting that the Vancouver School Board remove 33 “Mosquito” noise devices that target children from schools across the city. The devices emit a loud and painful sound frequency only audible to young people, toddlers and babies. They are often used to keep young people away from a particular property, but still permit access to adults.
“These devices have been found by the European Union to be a violation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child,” said Robert Holmes, Q.C., President of the BCCLA. “A teacher would not be permitted to cause pain or discomfort to a child for punishment; why should our schools be permitted to do the same to deter youth from gathering?”
Read more at link, includes a letter to the Vancouver School Board
CONGRATULATIONS SOLEIMAVIS AND PEACEPINK FOR BEEING RECONISED BY THE JOURNAL OF LAW AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION......CONGRATULATIONS....CONGRATULATIONS...CONGGRATULATIONS......
Attention- Torture- The Funkbildradar Satellite Radar Weapon- Please No To Funkbildrarture- Global Weapon and a weapon of mass destruction dar Sateliten Radarwaffen Actung ! Folter ! Bitte nein Folter- Globale Waffenforshung Menschenversklavung Kornkurrenzmord- Weapons of Mass Destruction- Non Lethal Weapons, Mind Control Weapons, or psychotronic weapons has been listed as weapons of Mass Destruction by UNIDIR-UN http://unidir.org/pdf/ouvrages/pdf-1-92-9045-002-2-en.pdf
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology
Inverness child labor cotton mill- USA How the Irish Became White. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall, September 1995. ISBN: 0-415-91384-5 Maybe if on all the Martin Luther King steets you could remind all the racism rising in America of the fact the Irish were enslaved- and add the name Daniel O'Connell Street to all those streets so as to remind the USA and world that there was a huge labor injustice against Irish and other Immigrants and that child labor laws were non existent- and the abuse of children as slaves was taking place in the USA up until 1920 http://freemanireland.ning.com/profiles/blogs/inverness-child-labor-cotton-mill-usa-how-the-irish-became-white
<br/>
<br/>
A Book:<p>Noel Ignatiev, How the Irish Became White.<br/>
New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall, September 1995.<br/>
ISBN: 0-415-91384-5</p>
<p>A Review:</p>
<p>The Boston Globe, November 7, 1995<br/>
"The Irish, the Blacks and the Struggle with Racism,"<br/>
by Elijah Wald, Globe Correspondent Reactions of Irish America to the 1841 appeal made to them by Daniel O'Connell, The Liberator, to join with anti-slavery forces in the USA. <a href="http://www.afn.org/~dks/race/wald-ignatiev.html">http://www.afn.org/~dks/race/wald-ignatiev.html</a></p>;
According to the CAT, the State should ensure that its “competent authorities proceed to a prompt and impartial investigation” of any torture allegations.[6] Similarly, the Istanbul Protocol asserts that the State should appoint a primary investigative authority (separately from providing access to legal services) to serve as the main liaison between the authorities and the alleged torture victim. This investigative authority must be separate from alleged torturers or any agency that employs them. [7]In doing so, the State should be sensitive to the victim's culture, language and gender. The investigator should attempt to obtain a detailed statement from the victim, color photographs of the injuries, as well as a thorough medical examination from an independent, qualified expert to produce a comprehensive evaluation of the alleged torture victim. The State should also provide the following information to the alleged torture victim during the investigation:
1. updates on the progress of the investigation; 2. information on all key hearings in the investigation and prosecution of the case; 3. updates on the suspected perpetrator (whether he/she has been identified, arrested etc.); 4. contact information for advocacy and treatment groups that might assist the victim; 5. the right to refuse questioning, to stop the investigation, or to take a break; 6. protection, not only for the victim, but also for the victim's family; 7. psychological counselors and other medical professionals trained in treating torture victims. When using any kind of formal, standardized equipment to conduct medical tests on suspected victims of torture, however doctors must be sensitive to the trauma. In fact, these instruments should only be used when absolutely necessary, such as when there is a legal case against the perpetrator and proof of torture is needed. [8]
When are we going to end this. It is taking forever. I can't take another day of my electronic harassment. Each day feels worse than the other. I am being tortured like hell with the mind reading and the voice to skull. Does anybody know if Greg or anybody else is ready to get this electronic harassment lawsuit going? I'm sorry, but it is really a nightmare having to wake up everyday putting up with this stuff.
International Criminal Court and the Protection of Witnesses and Victims of torture Globally- "The Rome Statute" 
rome_statute(e).pdf, 1 MB
Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court*
* Text of the Rome Statute circulated as document A/CONF.183/9 of 17 July 1998 and corrected by procès-verbaux of 10 November
1998, 12 July 1999, 30 November 1999, 8 May 2000, 17 January 2001 and 16 January 2002. The Statute entered into force on 1 July
2002.
Article 1
The Court
An International Criminal Court (“the Court”) is hereby established. It shall be a
permanent institution and shall have the power to exercise its jurisdiction over persons for the
most serious crimes of international concern, as referred to in this Statute, and shall be
complementary to national criminal jurisdictions. The jurisdiction and functioning of the Court
shall be governed by the provisions of this Statute. Article 2
Relationship of the Court with the United Nations
The Court shall be brought into relationship with the United Nations through an agreement
to be approved by the Assembly of States Parties to this Statute and thereafter concluded by the
President of the Court on its behalf.
Article 3
Seat of the Court
1. The seat of the Court shall be established at The Hague in the Netherlands (“the host
State”).
2. The Court shall enter into a headquarters agreement with the host State, to be approved by
the Assembly of States Parties and thereafter concluded by the President of the Court on its behalf.
3. The Court may sit elsewhere, whenever it considers it desirable, as provided in this
Statute.
Article 4
Legal status and powers of the Court
1. The Court shall have international legal personality. It shall also have such legal capacity
as may be necessary for the exercise of its functions and the fulfilment of its purposes.
2. The Court may exercise its functions and powers, as provided in this Statute, on the
territory of any State Party and, by special agreement, on the territory of any other State.
PART 2. JURISDICTION, ADMISSIBILITY AND APPLICABLE LAW
Article 5
Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court
1. The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the
international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute
with respect to the following crimes:
(a) The crime of genocide;
(b) Crimes against humanity;
(c) War crimes;
(d) The crime of aggression.
2. The Court shall exercise jurisdiction over the crime of aggression once a provision is
adopted in accordance with articles 121 and 123 defining the crime and setting out the conditions
under which the Court shall exercise jurisdiction with respect to this crime. Such a provision shall
be consistent with the relevant provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.
Article 6
Genocide
For the purpose of this Statute, “genocide” means any of the following acts committed
with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its
physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Article 7
Crimes against humanity
1. For the purpose of this Statute, “crime against humanity” means any of the following acts
when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian
population, with knowledge of the attack:
(a) Murder;
(b) Extermination;
(c) Enslavement;
(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of
fundamental rules of international law;
(f) Torture;
(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced
sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial,
national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are
universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act
referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;
(j) The crime of apartheid;
(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or
serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:
(a) “Attack directed against any civilian population” means a course of conduct
involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian
population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;
(b) “Extermination” includes the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia
the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of
a population;
(c) “Enslavement” means the exercise of any or all of the powers attaching to the right
of ownership over a person and includes the exercise of such power in the course of trafficking in
persons, in particular women and children;
(d) “Deportation or forcible transfer of population” means forced displacement of the
persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully
present, without grounds permitted under international law;
(e) “Torture” means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether
physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that
torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful
sanctions;
(f) “Forced pregnancy” means the unlawful confinement of a woman forcibly made
pregnant, with the intent of affecting the ethnic composition of any population or carrying out
other grave violations of international law. This definition shall not in any way be interpreted as
affecting national laws relating to pregnancy;
(g) “Persecution” means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights
contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity;
(h) “The crime of apartheid” means inhumane acts of a character similar to those
referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic
oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and
committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;
(i) “Enforced disappearance of persons” means the arrest, detention or abduction of
persons by, or with the authorization, support or acquiescence of, a State or a political
organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge that deprivation of freedom or to give
information on the fate or whereabouts of those persons, with the intention of removing them
from the protection of the law for a prolonged period of time.
3. For the purpose of this Statute, it is understood that the term “gender” refers to the two
sexes, male and female, within the context of society. The term “gender” does not indicate any
meaning different from the above.
Article 8
War crimes
1. The Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in particular when committed as
part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes.
2. For the purpose of this Statute, “war crimes” means:
(a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the
following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva
Convention:
(i) Wilful killing;
(ii) Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;
(iii) Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health;
(iv) Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by
military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly;
(v) Compelling a prisoner of war or other protected person to serve in the
forces of a hostile Power;
(vi) Wilfully depriving a prisoner of war or other protected person of the rights
of fair and regular trial;
我是一名居住在北京丰台区方庄街道的脑控受害者，已经被困在“卫星监狱”里一年多了，之前，一直被脑控武器欺骗着在北京生活。秘密使用卫星微波脑控武器的美国人使我失业、想方设法脑控周围的人，和我有对立的思想，让我的生活遇到不少麻烦。现在，我无法再就业、家庭收入越来越少。打仗的美国人的目的是让北京出现很穷的百姓家庭，让中国国内社会不稳定、利用有反对中国政府思想的中国百姓颠覆中国政府。整个中国已经被美国的卫星武器秘密地全部控制、作战了很多年。北京的皇家园林文物保护公园被卫星激光武器进攻过，琉璃瓦坏得很利害；各种卫星微波武器中的气象战武器在北京已经投入使用，去年我在雷阵雨中，看到过人造的雷和闪电，我用DV拍下来了；全中国有越来越多的人违法；政府里的人被意识欺骗着出错；法庭里的法官经常出现错误的主观思想，叛不好案子；欺骗进出口公司的人签订单，欺骗中国人廉价加工制造、出口；骗着中国国家领导人开放更多的领域，老外通过和民营企业合资进入中国的各行各业，把值钱的中国商品越来越多的出口；老外在中国从服装、食品等很多领域高价地挣钱；中国的周边国家非法入侵中国的领土、领海，并设法在法庭上使之合法化等等。
我是从2006年冬天在加拿大卡尔加里市被跟踪，后来脑袋里被穿入"voice to skull"的脑控武器的受害者，经常生病，很痛苦。前几天我又生病了，上吐、下泄，去医院看病，化验结果是：肠胃功能紊乱。后来，吃了一些药，一天后见好。上吐、下泄的病我已经得过三、四回了。我的经验是，如果脑控受害者得了这种病，可以尽量喝一些糖水等补充营养，到医院看病，吃药，治治看看。
在这里，和大家分享我的经历，希望对有同样经历的美国卫星微波脑控武器的受害者看病、留证据有帮助。
