This programming change the thinking of the subject and influence(positive or negative)his choice in life everyday.The subjects who are tortured with V2K are also often victims of the use of N.P.L directly in their brain.
Posted by AtlantiTeo on February 6, 2015 at 1:30pm
Un'altra vicenda tutta italiana di uno squallore aberrante. L'italian case number uan vittima delle torture a base di armi elettromagnetiche, microchip millimetrici in varie zone della testa e mind kontrol dal 2000(?) probabilmente per creare terrorismo psicologico ai terroristi negli ambienti del PCC Veneto affiliato alle Brigate Rosse che frequentava e definiti in gergo poliziesco gruppi sovversivi.
Un uomo di Venezia del '59 di nome Paolo, il maggiore dei fratelli Tommaso e Martino, tutti figli del politico di sinistra Wladimiro, inizia verso la fine degli anni'80, inizio anni '90 a frequentare gruppi affiliati alle Brigate Rosse. Assieme ad un piccolo gruppo di amici amiche verrà creato il PCC acronimo di Partito Comunista Combattente ben presente anche sulla wikipedia affiliato alle Brigate Rosse e localizzato in Veneto con i suoi adepti vicini all'ala di seconda posizione di cui indagherà a fondo il PM Ilda Boccassini nel 2004. Gruppi che in gergo poliziesco vengono definiti sovversivi. Il mio Paolo parteciperà (?) nel 1993 a degli attentati che sono solo atti dimostrativi senza nè morti, nè feriti. Verrà condotto in carcere dove in segreto, gli applicheranno dei microchip sottocutanei nel 1996 (?) e subirà quella che è chiamata tortura elettromagnetica ben famosa ai ROS di Giampaolo Ganzer che subito dopo il 911, venne invitato a Guantanamo dalla CIA.
Tutto quello che hanno fatto al mio Paolo, puzza di vendetta e ritorsione per creare terrorismo psicologico in tali ambienti da loro definiti sovversivi e il mio Paolo è l'unico che non ha accoppato nessuno e che si presume abbia solo effettuato atti dimostrativi senza nè morti nè feriti. Perchè applicare proprio al mio Paolo dei microchips sottocutanei in carcere a Spoleto o Biella visto che nelle BR c'erano personaggi ben più aggressivi e sanguinari e lui invece è mite come un agnello e non ha ammazzato o ferito nessuno? Cosa vi ha fatto il mio Paolo? Ancora ci si chiede quali siano i collegamenti tra il progetto mind kontrol della CIA e il programma abduction del MILAB, inoltre ci si chiede ancora perchè una marea di cittadini pregiudicati e incensurati subiscano i medesimi "trattamenti" individuali a distanza nelle carceri o se incensurati nelle loro abitazioni ed ovunque si rechino attraverso una stretta sorveglianza satellitare individuale che agisce nell'ombra e mai viene elargita dagli organi di informazione la verità grazie ad un sano e onesto giornalismo investigativo da indomito Muckracker. Il termine Targeted Individual, indica proprio Individui Mirati cioè individui che subiscono torture e/o molestie elettroniche a distanza riconducibili ad un' evoluzione sistematica e diabolica del progetto mk-ultra degli anni '60. Oramai i sospetti sono fondati dal fatto che il progetto mk-ultra iniziato negli USA è stato importato in Italia e nel mondo dagli stessi e vede coinvolti almeno quattro continenti in una lista sempre più cospicua del mcmailteam. Nel 2014, grazie ad una petizione online vinta su change.org, si vocifera che toglieranno i sigilli al Caso Ilaria Alpi; bisognerà riuscire a far aprire i sigilli di tale Segreto di Stato anche su queste operazioni clandestine e ottenere la veritas-is per tutti coloro che si fanno chiamare "Targeted Individuals" o "Mind Control Victims" e per il pubblico che cerca di seguire queste vicende con intelletto intuito e perspicacia, ma non può andare oltre perchè insabbiano le cose in una ennesima cover-up e c'è una confusione diabolica. Se ancora ci fossero la buona Ilaria Alpi con il vecchio Miran, non dubito si farebbero in otto e non solo in quattro per vederci chiaro come quando erano in Somalia. I Muckracker di ultima generazione non hanno spina dorsale su tale tematica.
Dal 1991 al 2004, il mio Paolo fu legalmente sposato con la venusta Alberta Biliato, anch'ella brigatista, ma nel frattempo Paolo frequentava e conviveva con Clara. Alberta aveva partecipato al sequestro del Generale americano James Dozier. Nel 1993, dopo quel matrimonio iniziato nel 1991, il mio Paolo decise di partecipare (?) ad un suo attentato peraltro dimostrativo contro la base USAF di Aviano.
Il militante comunista maoista di estrema sinistra, dopo quegli attentati dimostrativi del 1993, riceverà una pesante condanna di 13 anni e mezzo. Nel 2001 (?) inizierà la sua pressante tortura quotidiana. Dopo 12 anni e mezzo, a condanna quasi ultimata, verrà scarcerato in anticipo di un anno, ma ancora lamenta la presenza fastidiosa di microchips sottocutanei, tecnologia Voices to skull (voci intracraniche) "palpatine" ed erezioni indotte dall'omuncolo e altre porcate a distanza dettate dalle radiofrequenze. Egli riuscirà con fatica ad avere delle potenziali prove radiologiche, senza mai riuscire nell'impresa titanica dell'espianto chirurgico per poi con la corretta prassi e procedura scientifica e corretto protocollo passare subito ad anatompatologo questi oggettini ipersonici ed avere/elargire matematico scientifica certezza di cosa siano tutti questi abnormani "corpi estranei" ipersonici millimetrici di natura non biologica (emittenti radiofrequenza) conficcati nella testa, tube eustachio e parete timpanica, che i medici radiologici hanno evidenziato a fatica dopo più lastre e di cui vi sono già sospetti fondati essere microchips come si ode in un TG di Rete Veneta e dove vengono menzionate altre persone che come lui vogliono togliersi questi fastidiosi microchips. Nel 2005, assieme al politico Maurizio Bassetti (presente su peacepink e caso N°6) e assieme ad altre Vittime come Paola Marziani (case 19), il mio Paolo fonderà la AVAE-m che verrà ristipulata come ACOFOINMENEF nel 2009 sotto i suoi soli standard come da suo Statuto. I tre non si conoscevano tra loro prima del 2005. Il mio Paolo, Maurizio e Paola sono entrati in relazione e contatto comune attraverso mezzi di comunicazione come internet avvallando la tesi di avere analogie sorprendenti e che porteranno in seguito ad una casistica sempre più cospicua, ma non ottenendo mai il giusto interesse al fenomeno dilagante con evidente omertà e/o disinformazione di terzi. Un vero "impeachment". In seguito ci sarà un aggregazione degli italiani all'EUROPEAN FEDAME che si scioglierà nel 2009. Il FEDAME era ed è un massiccio e folto gruppo di Vittime europee con a capo letterati, ingegneri, avvocati, medici e persone di ogni ceto sociale, sesso, etnia di ogni paese europeo che annoverà di punto in bianco di subire le stesse molestie e/o torture elettromagnetiche a distanza.
Il mio Paolo scoprirà che non è l'unico italiano a cui hanno iniettato/innestato dei microchips sottucutanei millimetrici, alcuni nelle carceri come lui, altri incensurati [(MILAB - Military abduction del dr Helmut Lammer (?)], che tutt'ora vivono nelle loro abitazioni a cui il destino ha inflitto comunemente tale nefandezza con chiara ed evidente Violazione della Convenzione Norimberga e dei diritti umani e si impegnerà come meglio può, nel far effettuare TAC al millimetro ad alcuni che a lui vi si rivolgeranno e creare una "class action" come da suo Statuto associativo.
Egli, con esperienza diretta del problema sottocutaneo, si darà ragione del fatto che è meglio effettuare TAC millimetrale in determinate zone aereopatiche e non RMN con mezzo di contrasto che apparentemente sembrerebbe la via più idonea per accentuare la posizione dei "corpi estranei" ipersonici ed iperplastici, accentuarne lo spessore preciso di ognuno e il numero esatto. Vengono "imboscati" e occultati con membrane speciali per non farli scovare subito al primo radiologo di turno. Quasi tutti questi microchips, sono dello spessore che ruota attorno al millimetro, tuttavia molto potenti che entrano in modulazione di radiofrequenza; logicamente, chi li impianta, non vuole che con un banale esame medico come una radiografia si evidenzino subito e chi li innesta fradudolentemente, è l'unico che può rimuoverli senza danni cerebrali, danni uditivi o morte; qualcuno sospetta vi sia matrice extraterrestre (E.B.E.), ma è una tesi difficile da dimostrare. Più accettabile semmai per la razionalità umana additare organizzazioni di potere e il famigerato MILAB (sigla che indica la task force del Military Abduction che spesso può portare alcune vittime anche ad incontri perfino con i reali MIB Men in Black che non centrano nulla con il film satirico perchè il tema và affrontato con serietà). Dubito che chi li impianta, li espianterebbe ai poveracci che ne soffrono la presenza costante a coloro che ne hanno senza ombra di dubbio al 100% e sono per ora tutti condannati a vita da tali pazzi criminali, sadici e fetish come lo erano Joseph Mengele lo psichiatra Donald Ewen Cameron della CIA o lo psichiatra italiano Aldo Semerari che morì decapitato (testa mozzata). Geni criminali da non sottovalutare paragonabili al professor Moriarty accerrimo nemico di Sherlock Holmes che aveva un genio distruttivo e criminale e non metteva certo a frutto il suo genio in maniera costruttiva come certi "cervelli in fuga" o come Nikola Tesla e Stanley Meyer con il suo motore ad acqua grazie all'elettrolisi. Da buon criminologo è utile distunguere un genio criminale da un genio buono. Entrambi hanno un genio, ma il genio criminale è deviato e socialmente pericoloso. Il genio buono è un idealista a volte animico o con una certa etica e capita che possa soccombere a causa dei malvagi.
Oltre a tali esami radiologici, è possibile determinare un magnetismo insolito con il rilevatore. Il frequenzimetro o spettrometro come qui. Anche avvicinare un registratore vocale alle zone interessate crea un fenomeno interessante, tuttavia non vale come prova forense. Vale sono per ricercatori intelligenti, dotati e intuitivi che poi possono effettuare indagini e test più sofisticati, mirati e andare oltre con altri strumenti, test ed esami di laboratorio nelle giuste strutture. Questi discorsi non sono fatti per novellini o persone che non hanno a cuore la ricerca, medicina, biologia, biofisica e bioetica (bios). Nemmeno per quei denukerini che fanno solo chiacchiere per disinformare e mai usano la corretta prassi e procedura medico scientifica. Non vi è ancora espianto chirurgico con relativi esami istologici di anatomopatologo per nessuna delle vittime italiane. Solo un albanese - per ora - ha tutte le carte in regola ed ha eseguito per ogni espianto chirurgico un atto notarile. Trattasi di Petrit Demo di Tirana ed egli viene denigrato ugualmente dai soliti che hanno la panza piena e la botte 'mbriaga di chiacchiere. Egli ha cinque atti notarili. Uno per ogni espianto.
Alcune vittime elogeranno il mio Paolo dandogli i giusti meriti (oltre a nevrosi comprensibili e demeriti e critiche che deve accettare in quanto sotto attacco come lo lui e quindi tutti sotto nevrosi e stress) e che gli rifileranno l'appellativo simbolico di "dottor Paolo Dorigo" con una simbolica laurea ad honoris causa in radiologia. Una specie di radiologo il mio Paolo dopo tutte le TAC a cui ha partecipato negli anni. Saranno veramente tantissime le radiografia che supervisionerà dal 2005 in poi da fargli arrivare l'appellativo simbolico di "radiologo" da alcune vittime come lui. Nel frattempo, nuove Vittime entreranno in questo circuito mondiale chiamato mcmailteam e giunti nel 2015, la casistica diverrà imponente sia in Italia che nel resto del mondo.
Purtroppo si faranno avanti casi lievi, casi medi e casi gravi (come il sottoscritto riconosciuto come grave da aisjca-mft nel 2010) ed anche casi incerti, ma anche presunti troll, perditempo, debunkers avidi e sadici, scientisti senza arte nè parte, presunti ricercatori senza titoli, mitomani o comunque persone che non sanno capire cosa cercano, cosa vogliono e che perdono e fanno perdere tempo ingarbugliando ancor più la matassa. Non compilano questionari, non cercano di effettuare indagini mediche da soli/e, non rilasciano grandi memoriali o questionari, non compilano esposti e restano nell'ombra a fare mucchio. Scommetto che se vi fosse un vaglio con la giusta equipe medico scientifica con tutti i test, le premure e le prudenze per ogni singolo caso con sana deontologia e bioetica, salterebbero fuori una marea di mitomani e quindi persone suggestionabili e labili. Con tale atteggiamento non sono casi gravi. I casi gravi li riconosci subito e mostrano una disperazione evidente causa vere e proprie torture forti, estreme e prolungate che li fanno deperire e sfiorire rapidamente. "I gravi" non perdono tempo quando ricevono direttive. Di solito i casi gravi hanno già una qualche documentazione medica e sono stati più volti in Pronto Soccorso o dal medico di base (MMG).
Tra i censimenti vittime armi elettromagnetiche, ad oggi, si registra siano passate persone apolitiche, persone di sinistra, persone di destra, brillini e anarchici. Non fanno distinzione politica quelli che mettono in atto tale progetto criminale su diversi cittadini (I PERPS). Molti lamentano di essere stati ostracizzati a priori da "certe" associazioni. Su fb ho già incontrato tre vittime che si dichiaravano di destra assai furibonde per non aver ricevuto nessuna partecipazione ed anzi estrema esclusione ed estrema unzione a priori da una "certa" associazione che qualcuno definisce "club privè ☭". E' evidente che quelli che scelgono le cavie, non interessa nulla delcredo politico, religioso o ceto sociale. A certi altri coordinatori invece si! (piccola nota dolente e critica che un saggio dovrebbe accettare).
Si registrano inoltre vittime che si sono infamate tra vittime e inflitte dispettini l'un l'altra causa un ambiente saturo di negatività, elettromagnetismo, persecuzione elettronica, molestie o vere e proprie torture che portano tali vittime a scaricare frustrazioni una sull'altra. Oppure semplici pettegolezzi perchè le cose non girano nella maniera giusta. Tutto ciò tuttavia non accade solo in Italia, ma anche nel resto d'Europa e in tutto il "magico" mondo dei Targeted Individuals. Dopo cinque, sei, sette o più anni di gavetta alcuni cominciano ad abituarcisi e divenire più cauti e tranquilli, a non dar peso a tali scresci e a fregarsene perchè sono solo riflessi psicologici incondizionati. D'altra parte i T.I. sono persone malate o forse è più corretto e giusto specificare che sono state fatte ammalare da perversi sadici, meschini e senza valori che odiano la vita (bios) e che li fanno ammattire come nel Programma Monarch e non vi è nessuno scopo scientifico, semmai bellico e di perversione fetish al pari di Josepeh Fritz di Amstetten. Joseph Fritz era un ingegnere e non era un'idiota. Aveva un genio criminale. Rinchiuse la figlia Elisabeth nei sotterranei per 24 (ventiquattro) anni e il suo scopo era fetish. Non aveva nessuno scopo scientifico. Chiariamo che coloro che mettono in atto il Progetto Mind Kontrol Evolution hanno un'attitudine simile a quella di Joseph Fritz e Ariel Castro (mostro di Portland) e hanno una psiche deviata e pericolosa da "profiling offender". Solo chi vive tale situazione quotidianamente e riesce a scindere razionalmente e studiare i suoi "carcerieri" può comprenderne tutti gli aspetti più oscuri tracciando una sorta diProfiling Offenderdei PERPS e può avanzare tesi logiche. Vive in una forma di riduzione in schiavitù 24/7. Può uscire di casa, può andare ovunque, ma se ha dispositivi come microchips che lo tracciano, che lo tormentano, lo scottano (ipertermia), gli trasmettono scosse elettriche e dolori estenuanti è come vivere in gabbia e non è tanto differente da Elisabeth Fritz, Natasha Kampush, o Michelle Knight. Tra i PERPS (carcerieri) si annidiano maschi e femmine in tale sofisticato progetto criminale deviato atto ad avere "lo schiavetto" e "la schiavetta". Può inoltre nascere una Sindrome di Stoccolma bilaterale, ma ad opera della vittima vi è sempre un rifiuto nell'accettare tale riduzione in schiavitù e il desiderio incessante di uscirne al pari di Elisabeth Fritz, Natasha Kampush e Michelle Knight(nel link lo schema del labirinto dell'Ingeger Fritz) che appena hanno avuto la possibilità di scappare dai loro rispettivi mostri non se la sono fatta sfuggire. Natasha appena ebbe l'occasione di scappare da WolfGang non se la fece sfuggire e lo stesso vale per Michelle Knight. Elisabeth invece venne liberata dal padre.
Se nascono scresci, dispettini, accuse e infamate tra alcune vittime con altre vittime non è nemmeno colpa loro. Vivono tutte in un gioco perverso privo di senso logico perchè la vita non è fatta per vivere in una forma di riduzione in schiavitù al pari di Eliabeth Fritz o Natasha Kampush o Michelle Knight. I Targeted Individuals non si sono messi assieme per giocare a carte o per un torneo di scacchi e vivono quasi ogni giorno discorsi barbosi e termini difficili da capire come (Targeted Individuals, Voices to skull, PERPS, gangstalking) a cui tutti loro farebbero volentieri a meno e penso preferibbero coltivare altri interessi e hobbyes come ad esempio arte o musica. Forzatamente le vittime sono costrette a studiare come possono la fenomenologia e a relazionarsi tra loro per cercare di tirasene fuori con un benemerito tacito degli organi competenti che se avessero ancora una Ilaria Alpi o persone di quello stampo, metterebbero alle strette gli organi competenti e la stampa come quando Bill Clinton nell'ottobre 1995 fu sottomesso nell'andare in servizio stampa e confessare a tutto il mondo che mk-ultra era un progetto realmente esistito. Bill Clinton però mai affermò che tali crimini stavano proseguendo e che tale mind control era stato esportato/importato in tutto il mondo con quello che io chiamo Progetto Mind Kontrol Evolution e Revolution perchè il termine gangstalking non è chiaro e trae in inganno facendo fuorviare il primo che passa a interpretarlo come stalking inflitto da una gang. E' sì una persecuzione,ma tale termine tutto americano fa erroneamente cadere in errori di interpretazione. Mind Kontrol Evolution è semplicemente un evoluzione sistematica del rudimentale e pionieroistico progetto mk-ultra degli anni '50/'60 e che adesso si può infliggere a distanza. D'altra parte negli anni 60 non esistevano il wireless e nemmeno il satellitare di cui Ronald Reagan con STAR WARS negli anni '80 ne fu diretto interessato. Non è un caso che in Italia, la luga casistica inizia verso la fine degli anni '90 a cavallo del 2000. Importato dagli italiani o esportato dagli americani poco importa. Restano loro i namber uan.
Nella vicenda di Aviano, il dottor Paolo DORIGO radiologo è stato seguito - oltre che dalla DIGOS, dai ROS di Ganzer e dalla CIA del Generale James DOZIER - dai legali e giammai illegali:-
1) durante istruttoria e processo di 1° e 2° grado dall'Avv. Attilio Baccioli del foro di Grosseto
2) nel ricorso per Cassazione e nel primo ricorso a Strasburgo, dall' Avv. Giuseppe Pelazza del foro di Milano
3) nella prosecuzione della detenzione e negli appelli a Strasburgo e ricorsi vari, dall' Avv. Vittorio Trupiano del foro di Napoli
4) nell'attuale situazione e processi di Bologna per la revisione, dall'Avv.Marina Prosperi del foro di Bologna
5) in attesa del nuovo processo, dall'Avv.Marina Prosperi di Bologna e da un altro legale di nome Luca Piaia foro di Treviso. Fonte wikipedia - Pasaia Paela.
28 febbraio 2006 - IL MISTERO DELLA TORTURA BIANCA
Il 12 dicembre 2004 la commissione medica incaricata dal tribunale di sorveglianza di Perugia di accertare se le condizioni di Dorigo necessitassero di un ricovero ospedaliero extracarcerario ha espresso, tramite la prof.Francesca Barone e lo psichiatra dott. Paolo Catanzaro, il seguente giudizio: il soggetto esaminato sarebbe affetto da "schizofrenia affettiva" e "con un identità pericolosamente fondata sulla sovversione sociale", che andrebbe curato con una "terapia fondata sul lavoro", oltre che con sostanze come benzodiazepine ipnoinducenti. In poche parole, secondo la commissione medica, Dorigo sarebbe uno psicopatico che non necessita di cure esterne al carcere, ma solo di psicofarmaci.
Ma allora perché le perizie psichiatriche precedentemente effettuate l'aveva giudicato totalmente sano di mente? Come si spiega l'ampia e approfondita documentazione scientifica che Dorigo ha presentato più volte alle autorità per giustificare le proprie richieste? e se è davvero uno psicopatico, perché non gli viene permesso di essere visitato fuori dal carcere? Se non c'è niente che possa essere rivelato dagli esami, di che cosa hanno paura? Oggi i risultati degli esami effettuati da Dorigo nell'ospedale civile di Dolo (Ve) mostrano che forse qualcosa da nascondere c'era…
*Alcune gamme dei deleterei psicofarmaci: ipnotici, ansiolitici, antidepressivi, neurolettici, benzodiazepine.
27/10/1993 -
PORDENONE - Per i magistrati della Procura e per gli agenti della Digos di Pordenone sono gli eredi delle Brigate Rosse. Sono finiti in carcere in 5, tre con l' accusa di aver messo a segno l' attentato alla base Nato di Aviano e di aver organizzato un gruppo terroristico che fa capo alle Br, due solo con l' accusa di rapina. Sono stati arrestati in provincia di Venezia Paolo Dorigo (fratello di un deputato di Rifondazione comunista) e la sua convivente Clara Clerici, a Genova Francesco Aiosa, a Grosseto Aldo Berti e a Pordenone Angelo Dalla Longa. Tutti trentenni e già noti agli investigatori per le loro attività nei gruppi vicini ad Autonomia Operaia dalla fine degli anni 70. L' attentato contro il dormitorio dei soldati americani dell' aeroporto di Aviano era stato messo a segno nella notte del 2 settembre, proprio nei giorni in cui la tensione in Bosnia era al massimo e sembrava che l' intervento aereo della Nato fosse ormai questione di ore: l' aeroporto militare, infatti, ospitava i velivoli che avrebbero dovuto partecipare ai raid sulle colline intorno a Sarajevo. Da subito gli inquirenti affermarono che chi aveva colpito voleva uccidere: gli attentatori avevano lanciato una bomba a mano di tipo Ananas e avevano sparato 7 colpi di pistola. Le indagini imboccarono immediatamente la pista del terrorismo rosso perché la rivendicazione arrivò con una telefonata che dava indicazioni precise sulle modalità dell' attentato e sull' auto utilizzata per compierlo. In seguito vennero fatti trovare volantini firmati dal gruppo terroristico in varie città italiane, tra cui Milano e Pisa. Infine, l' irriducibile Antonio Fosso lesse un comunicato di rivendicazione dalle gabbie dell' aula del processo Moro quater. Il volantino, firmato con la sigla "per la costruzione del partito comunista combattente Brigate Rosse" portava nell' intestazione la stella a cinque punte e iniziava con una citazione di Mao. Sosteneva che l' azione terroristica di Aviano voleva colpire "uno dei maggiori centri operativi e logistici Usa nell' Europa del sud" e si dilungava sulla necessità di avviare "il processo di disarticolazione della seconda repubblica". A condurre gli investigatori ai presunti autori dell' atto terroristico è stata l' auto utilizzata per l' attentato e ritrovata poco dopo nei pressi di Pordenone, con un caricatore di kalashnikov, una pistola e un contenitore per bombe a mano sui sedili. Era una Saab rubata un mese prima in provincia di Treviso. La Criminalpol del Veneto è riuscita ad individuare i due giovani che l' avevano rubata, i trevigiani Nicola Modolo e Giuliano Piacentin, entrambi pregiudicati per reati comuni e legati ad un personaggio, anche lui finito più volte in carcere per rapina ma che a Porto Azzurro si era politicizzato, il pordenonese Dalla Longa. Proprio in quei giorni, quest' ultimo era stato sorpreso dai carabinieri con ottanta grammi di eroina ed era stato arrestato. Modolo e Piacentin, accusati soltanto del furto e scarcerati pochi giorni dopo, la Saab rubata l' avevano consegnata a lui che a sua volta, stando alla ricostruzione degli inquirenti, l' avrebbe passata al veneziano Dorigo, uno dei presunti organizzatori dell' attentato alla base militare Usa assieme ad Aiosa e allo stesso Dalla Longa. Dorigo poi, con la convivente e Berti, avrebbe compiuto una rapina ai danni di un supermercato di Pordenone il 10 agosto scorso. Dorigo, la Clerici, Aiosa e Berti sono stati prelevati nelle loro rispettive abitazioni mentre a Dalla Longa l' ordine di custodia cautelare è stato notificato nel carcere di Pordenone dove si trovava già per detenzione e spaccio di droga. La Digos della città friulana ha recuperato anche una parte delle armi che sarebbero state utilizzate nell' attentato, un mitragliatore kalashnikov di provenienza jugoslava e un mitra MP-40 di fabbricazione Usa. Armi potenti e micidiali che erano state sotterrate sul Cansiglio, l' altopiano al confine tra le province venete di Treviso e Belluno che più volte ha accolto l' ex presidente della Repubblica Francesco Cossiga e quest' anno anche Oscar Luigi Scalfaro per le ferie. Per giungere al nascondiglio delle armi e per ricostruire i passaggi dell' auto rubata evidentemente gli inquirenti devono aver convinto uno o più aderenti al gruppo brigatista a collaborare con la giustizia. Ora le indagini proseguono: gli investigatori, infatti, avrebbero sequestrato documenti i quali dimostrerebbero che il gruppo intendeva organizzare altri atti terroristici.
Stavano preparando altri attentati, dopo quello alla base Nato di Aviano. Nel mirino c' erano il ministro del Lavoro, Gino Giugni, già "gambizzato" oltre 10 anni fa, e alcuni suoi collaboratori, l' amministratore delegato della Fiat Auto Paolo Cantarella, progettista della Punto, e un dirigente dell' Ansaldo di Genova che per ora non è stato identificato. Sarebbero stati gli inquirenti di Pordenone e quelli della città ligure a trovare alcuni documenti che hanno fatto ritenere attendibile l' ipotesi che i terroristi intendessero colpire l' esponente socialista e i due manager. Ma i due arrestati di spicco, il veneziano Paolo Dorigo, 34 anni, e il genovese Francesco Aiosa, 35 anni, entrambi accusati di militare nelle Br, non confermano: si limitano ad ammettere la loro appartenenza al gruppo terroristico. La nuova formazione si rifà al gruppo "Per la ricostruzione del partito comunista combattente" - una corrente interna alle Brigate rosse guidata dall' irriducibile Antonino Fosso, uno degli imputati del Moro quater a Roma e che è nata dopo che la maggior parte della vecchia dirigenza si era dissociata o aveva dichiarato ormai sconfitta la lotta armata. A tradire i "nuovi br" sono stati soprattutto gli stretti rapporti con elementi della malavita veneta e friulana. A condurre gli inquirenti a Dorigo e Aiosa, gli organizzatori dell' attentato alla base Usa di Aviano del 2 settembre, infatti, sono stati due pregiudicati che avevano rubato l' auto per conto dell' organizzazione. E' stata la Criminalpol veneta ad individuare Giuliano Piacentin e Nicola Modolo, i ladri della Saab 900 usata per l' attacco terroristico. Poi, uno di loro ha parlato, indicando in Angelo Dalla Longa, un rapinatore pordenonese di 43 anni avvicinatosi alle Br nel supercarcere di Porto Azzurro, l' uomo a cui avevano consegnato la macchina. Anche Dalla Longa, già in carcere per essere stato bloccato con 80 grammi di eroina, non avrebbe fatto scena muta. "Quello che balza agli occhi - afferma Carlo Mastelloni, il giudice veneziano che con le sue indagini smantellò la colonna veneta delle Br nei primi anni 80 e fece arrestare Dorigo nell' ambito di un' indagine sui gruppi contigui ad Autonomia operaia - è questa alleanza con i malavitosi, che le vecchie Br rifiutavano. Questo richiama alla mente più che l' esperienza brigatista, quella dei Nap, che proprio in virtù della loro alleanza con la criminalità vennero sconfitti". Per il magistrato si tratta di una scelta perdente perché spesso i malavitosi sono persone ricattabili e quindi facilmente utilizzabili dalle forze dell' ordine e non solo da quelle. "Sembra una brutta copia di un' esperienza già fatta" sostiene Mastelloni, che considera per ora non alta la pericolosità di questo gruppo. "Fino adesso si tratta di episodi sporadici, che non hanno trovato appoggi o legami nei movimenti di sinistra, come accadde invece negli anni 70", dice ancora. "Per il risorgere delle Brigate rosse a vasto raggio - conclude Mastelloni - non esistono le condizioni storiche ". Comunque, stando agli accertamenti degli inquirenti pordenonesi coordinati dal pm Antonello Fabbro, sarebbero una quarantina i giovani simpatizzanti della nuova formazione terroristica, che si stava organizzando come una vera e propria colonna operante nel nord-Italia. Già si articolava su due piani: la struttura militare, incaricata di mettere a segno attentati, e quella politica, che si occupava delle rivendicazioni e della gestione complessiva degli atti terroristici. E un ruolo importante avrebbero avuto proprio il genovese Aiosa e il veneziano Dorigo. Il primo, operaio dell' Ansaldo nella città ligure, nel 1980 era stato condannato a otto anni e mezzo di reclusione: era considerato un irriducibile. Era stato scarcerato due anni fa. Dorigo, invece, ha una storia legata all' Autonomia operaia veneta: dal 1985 in poi era stato arrestato altre tre volte per associazione sovversiva e banda armata, ma alla fine era sempre stato assolto. Il suo primo arresto, comunque, risale ai primi anni Settanta: ancora ragazzino, nel magazzino di casa, gli scoppiò una bottiglia molotov tra le mani. Ieri, il fratello di Dorigo, il deputato di Rifondazione comunista Martino, ha voluto precisare che "il fatto che Paolo sia stato arrestato non ha niente a che vedere né con me né con il mio partito". Il pm Fabbro, grazie alla collaborazione di uno degli arrestati, è riuscito a ricostruire attimo per attimo anche l' attentato di Aviano. A guidare l' auto rubata sarebbe stato Dalla Longa, mentre a sparare i sette colpi di pistola sporgendosi dal tettuccio della Saab sarebbe stato Dorigo (il kalashnikov che avevano con loro si era subito inceppato), mentre Aiosa sarebbe sceso e avrebbe lanciato la bomba tipo ananas. L' auto sarebbe ripartita di gran carriera ancor prima che il genovese riuscisse a risalire. Così, mentre l' auto si allontanava rincorsa da una macchina della Militar Police Usa, il brigatista ligure sarebbe stato costretto a fuggire a piedi attraverso i campi.
Il divorzio del terrorista irriducibile 'Mia moglie collabora con lo Stato'
Un marito ed una mogliehanno molti modi per smettere di andare d' accordo: un amore può rompersi per divergenze irrimediabilisu come si carica una lavastoviglie, su come si educano i figli, su chi porta a spasso il cane. Anche Paolo Dorigo e Alberta Biliato, entrambi terroristi rossi☭, chiedono al tribunale civile di Milano di riconoscere che è venuta meno la «comunione morale» su cui si basava il loro matrimonio: come dimostra il fatto che lui rimane un rivoluzionario irriducibile, mentre lei ha accettato di dialogare con lo Stato. Per questo il tribunale dovrebbe dichiarare sciolto il matrimonio celebrato in carcere dodici anni fa tra i due militanti della lotta armata. Nel ricorso per la separazione consensuale - firmato dal legale dei due, l' avvocato Gianfranco Palumbo - viene indicato anche un altro elemento che dovrebbe dimostrare l' irrecuperabilità della frattura: il matrimonio non è mai stato consumato. Per dimostrarlo basta confrontare le schede carcerarie dei due coniugi. Da queste, risulta chiaramente che mai, nemmeno per un giorno, i due sono stati liberi di incontrarsi. Detenuti erano quando si sono sposati, detenuti sono tutt' ora. L' irriducibile Dorigo non ha mai messo il naso fuori dal carcere. La più ragionevole Biliato ha iniziato a godere di qualche permesso premio dal 2000, ha potuto fare visita alla mamma, ma di certo - visto che le "ore d' amore" consentite in alcuni carceri stranieri in Italia non esistono - non ha potuto intrattenersi col marito, e men che meno nell' intimità. Dei due, ad avere sulle spalle il fardello più pesante è la donna. Alberta Biliato stava nelle Brigate Rosse, faceva parte del commando che sequestrò ed uccise Alberto Taliercio, dirigente del Petrolchimico di Marghera, e rapì il generale americano James Lee Dozier (nella foto) a Verona il 17 dicembre 1981. Dorigo era anche lui nelle Br, ma non ha mai ammazzato nessuno, si è limitato ad attaccare la base Usa di Aviano, in Friuli. Quando, nel 1991, decisero di sposarsi, confidavano «in una non remota possibilità di potere, prima o poi, iniziare a vivere concretamente insieme grazie alle misure alternative previste dall' ordinamento penitenziario, e quindi successivamente realizzare una comunione non solo spirituale ma anche morale e materiale». Ma glianni passano, e a volte l' ideologia scava fossati profondi.Così proprio ora, quando a Dorigo mancano una manciata dimesi per tornare libero, un giudice dichiarerà ufficialmente chiusa la loro storia d' amore.
N.D.R.: Alberta Biliato fu la ragazza di Ruggero Volinia soprannominato Emilia Libera che ordì il rapimento Dozier a Verona. Ne hanno tratto un film denominato: Stato di emergenza - Il caso Dozier. Lo stesso generale, dopo 30 anni dalla sua liberazione datata 28 gennaio 1982 dichiara qui a sicurezzapubblica che fu un grande attacco alla Democrazia. Peccato che anche il progetto mk-ultra (oppure MIND KONTROL EVOLUTION cioè un' evoluzione sistematica del progetto mk-ultra) importato in Italia dagli USA e che hanno inflitto al compannio Dorigo e ad altri Cittadini del tutto incensurati sia un grande attacco alla Democrazia non differente dal terrorismo rosso delle BR e dal terrorismo della SERENISSIMA di destra e proprio loro facciano sempre silenzio su questi aspetti antidemocratici e che sia sempre l'afroamericano Derrick Robinson della FFCHS a doversene occupare nella sua America. Caro James, queste cose le schivi e quindi sei un altro poveraccio al pari di quelli che ti rapirono e che forse, avevano motivazioni valide vista la vostra "falsa Democrazia americana" e il MUOS a Niscemi in Sicilia che è gestito dalla vostra America fascista e peggio ancora capitalista. (Documentario di AARON RUSSO intitolato: America Dalla libertà al fascismo). Caro Dozier dai un sguardo al progetto MK-ULTRA EVOLUTION sennò significa che non vali una emme come americano e sei tale e quale ad un talebano e sei peggio delle BRIGATE ROZZE e/o BRIGATE ZOZZE e/o BRIGATE TOZZE e/o BRIGATE COZZE (-_-)
Scena tratta dal film: Stato di emergenza - Il caso Dozier. Si vede una comparsa che recita la parte di Alberta.
07/06/1994 -
Bombe ad Aviano: proclama delle Br in aula
Iniziato ieri con la lettura in aula di un documento di strategia delle Br il processo nei confronti di Aiosa Francesco, Dorigo Paolo , Pizzarelli Ario e Clerici Clara accusati dell' attentato alla base USA di Aviano nel settembre dello scorso anno
TITOLO: Bombe ad Aviano: proclama delle Br in aula.
UDINE - Si e' aperto ieri a Udine con la lettura di un documento di rivendicazione e di strategia delle Br il processo a quattro brigatisti imputati di banda armata, associazione a fini terroristici e attentato, per gli spari e la bomba contro la palazzina dormitorio della basa miliare USA di Aviano. I fatti risalgono al 2 settembre del ' 93. In gabbia, Francesco Aiosa, Paolo Dorigo, Ario Pizzarelli e Clara Clerici. "Il 2 settembre 1993 . ha esordito Pizzarelli . un nucleo armato della nostra organizzazione ha attaccato il personale militare americano della base aerea USA di Aviano: lo rivendichiamo ancora una volta in quest' aula come militanti delle Brigate rosse per la costruzione del partito comunista combattente. Lo scopo era di infliggere le maggiori perdite e causare il maggior danno possibile al nemico".
LIVORNO.Bandana rossa e capelli lunghi, la mano sinistra stretta in un pugno sollevato sopra la testa. E intorno a lui la scorta della polizia penitenziaria. Così ieri mattina è entrato in aula Paolo Dorigo, 45 anni, il veneziano irriducibile della lotta armata, presunto brigatista rosso. Dietro le transenne un pubblico venuto apposta per lui, una trentina di persone - riunite sotto le sigle di Associazione solidarietà proletaria e Soccorso rosso proletario - radunatesi per esprimergli solidarietà. All'ennesimo slogan «Paolo libero!» il presidente del tribunale, Marisa Sammarco, ha ordinato ai carabinieri di far allontanare i più esagitati. Ma non c'è stato bisogno, anche perché il processo è stato subito rinviato al 29 ottobre. I manifestanti si sono trasferiti con striscioni e volantini all'esterno del Palazzo di giustizia, mentre Dorigo è stato ricondotto al carcere di Spoleto. Tornerà dunque a ottobre per rispondere di danneggiamenti: un materasso e una coperta dati alle fiamme nella primavera 2002, quando da Biella era stato trasferito nel carcere delle Sughere. Ma Dorigo più che imputato si sente vittima: il suo avvocato, Vittorio Trufiano, sostiene che Dorigo sarebbe stato pestato da alcuni agenti nella sezione penale psichiatrica del carcere livornese: «Quattro agenti la cui posizione venne archiviata dal gip Sandra Lombardi su richiesta del pm Mario Profeta». Anche il volantino diffuso dalle due associazioni parla di «un pestaggio subìto da una squadretta di guardie», dopo il quale «Dorigo si asserragliò nelle docce, dove resistette fino a quando per fermarlo le guardie gli provocarono un parziale soffocamento». Versioni diverse.Il sostituto Mario Profeta spulcia le carte processuali e spiega che «a me non risultano episodi di violenze commessi dalle guardie, se dovessero emergere al dibattimento verranno presi in considerazione, ci mancherebbe. Ma agli atti l'unica denuncia riguarda la violazione della sua corrispondenza». Dorigo avrebbe cioè accusato le guardie di aver aperto, senza autorizzazione, lettere speditegli nel carcere a Livorno mentre lui era già a Spoleto. La denuncia è del 5 settembre 2002. Ma per Profeta l'apertura era autorizzata: «Ne era stato disposto il sequestro dai giudici di Pordenone, ecco il perché dell'archiviazione». Irriducibile.Dorigo non ha mai rinnegato il suo passato. Quando le Br rivendicarono l'omicidio di Massimo D'Antona, lui dalla cella scrisse una lettera eloquente sulla ripresa della lotta armata. Due mesi fa un pentito islamico raccontò che, in carcere a Spoleto, il veneziano aveva brindato all'attentato delle Torri Gemelle. Questo per dire di che pasta sia fatto Dorigo.Un duro, un irriducibile, uno che ha rifiutato anche sconti di pena. Che però si è sempre proclamato innocente per l'attentato del settembre '93 alla base Nato di Aviano (Pordenone). Per quell'attentato, che non causò morti né feriti e fu poi rivendicato dalle Br, dal '94 Dorigo sta scontando una condanna a 13 anni e 6 mesi. Per la sentenza giocarono un ruolo decisivo le dichiarazioni di alcuni pentiti rese durante le indagini ma non ripetute in aula. Le censure di Strasburgo.Nel giugno 1999 la Commissione europea dei diritti umani censurò per insufficienza di garanzie l'articolo 513 del codice di procedura penale italiano (la facoltà di non rispondere in sede di dibattimento di cui si avvalsero i pentiti) ritenendolo in contrasto con l'articolo 6 della convenzione europea dei diritti umani. Seguirono altre pronunce internazionali, in particolare una risoluzione in cui si imponevano adempimenti e scadenze al governo italiano. «Pronunce completamente ignorate da governo, parlamento e tribunali - scrivono Asp e Srp - ma non da chi gestisce e controlla le sue carceri». Le lettere.Sulla corrispondenza non è mai venuta meno l'attenzione della magistratura. Nel luglio '99, mentre gli investigatori lavoravano all'omicidio D'Antona, a Bologna fu intercettata una lettera di Clara Clerici, la compagna di Dorigo, anche lei in carcere per l'attentato di Aviano. Era indirizzata al Centro documentazione Krupskaja, un circolo del movimento antagonista, e destinata al reclutamento di nuovi terroristi. Clerici fu denunciata per apologia di reato; si cominciò a indagare su di lei e su suoi presunti contatti col Nordest. Nel dicembre 2002 fu interrogato a Rebibbia il brigatista Michele Pegna, che avrebbe continuato a mantenere contatti con alcuni brigatisti in carcere tra cui Dorigo, al quale scrisse più volte dopo la sua liberazione dal supercarcere di Trani (gennaio 2000). «Un caso esemplare».Secondo le associazioni «il caso Dorigo è esemplare. Su Paolo si sono accaniti con varie tecniche di destabilizzazione psicofisica; è stato sottoposto a continue perquisizioni corporali, violenze, dispersione, allontanamento dagli altri rivoluzionari prigionieri, desolidarizzazione, negazione di strumenti per lo sviluppo delle attività intellettuali, negazione a un'assistenza sanitaria adeguata, controllo e ostacolo della posta ecc. Già dalla sentenza contro Dorigo, divenuta definitiva nel 1996, emerge l'illegalità di questa pena». Il microchip.«A partire dal 2002 - continua la nota - la persecuzione contro Dorigo conosce un brusco giro di vite: ripetuti pestaggi, violenze e abusi, Paolo inizia ad accusare strani disturbi che lo portano a denunciare che gli abbiano installato un microchip in un orecchio. Invece di disporre immediati accertamenti, la direzione del carcere di Biella ordina il suo trasferimento a Livorno col pretesto di periziarne la salute mentale».
Terribile sorte anche per il gemello latino maoista del mio Paolo (il 5° della family e della dinastia Dorigo). Il sig. Manuel Rubén Abimael Guzmán Reynoso (nella foto a sinistra)terroristaperuviano, conosciuto anche con il nome di battaglia Camarada Gonzalo, già professore di filosofia, fu tra gli anni Ottanta e Novanta il leader diSentiero Luminoso, gruppoterroristaperuviano di matricemaoista.Sentiero Luminoso nacque alla fine degli anni Settanta ed iniziòlalotta armatanei primi anni Ottanta. Ricercato per terrorismo e tradimento, Guzmán fu catturato dal governo peruviano nel1992e condannato all'ergastolo.http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abimael_Guzm%C3%A1n
Segue un video interessante con gli "EI TIM" al lavoro.Il Tanko, un "carro armato" artigianale dei secessionisti veneti della Serenissima di estrema destra.
A) Bombe a mano, molotov, lanciamissili e fucili mitragliatori a ☭sinistra☭.
B) Carroarmati Tanko di estrema卐destra卐.
C) In mezzo ai comunisti e fascisti, il RO$ del Generale Giampaolo Ganzer,cioècolui che si è beccato 14 anni di condanna per traffico internazionale di droga grazie all'onesto PM Armando Spataro.Cosa faceva il loro Generale? Sequestrava tonnellate di cocaina ad una cosca e poi la rivendeva ad un'altra.Messe insieme le tre fazioni di comunisti,fascisti e carabinieri dei ROSdi Coca Ganzeressericordano una marea di miladristi rossoneri (O_o). Le tre fazioni, potrebbero scontrarsi in un triangolare allo Stadio di San Siro, e non vi è dubbio che esso sarebbe gremito da quanti sono.Il triangolo- per antonomasia - rappresenta un segnale di PERICOLO. Rossi che darebbero botte ai neri e ai ROS, neri che darebbero botte ai rossi e ai ROS, e i RO$ che darebbero botte ai neri e ai rossi. Un triangolare di 45'' allo Stadio con relative tifoserie, bandiere e inni, potrebbe essere la soluzione sportiva per vederli impegnati a darsele allo Stadio,mastavoltasul campo e senza i loro hooligans e ultras di esaltati! (-_-)
A quelli dell'attacco della Serenissima (destra) avranno applicato microchip? Perchè solo a me al mio Paolo e ad altri poveracci/e? Io ero pressochè apolitico. Non è un segreto che io ho sempre votato tutto nella vita, ho enplein e infatti ho tre tessere elettorali che dimostrano tutti i timbri. La prima fu stata smarrita sul più bello, poi ritrovata in un cassetto e fui costretto a chiedere la seconda in comune che è piena di timbri e ha esaurito gli spazi, poi c'è la terza da poco cominciata. Dal 2006 in poi votavo sempre scheda nulla e lo sà bene chi mi conosce veramente e mi frequenta dal vivo e non certo online. Oramai era dal 1994 che vedevo una volta governo centrodestra e poi governo centrosinistra e già nel 2006, era inutile votare qualcuno di loro. Hei tipo/a. Io ho sempre votato tutto. Io c'ero a tutti tutti tutti i Referendum e tu? Ho tutti i timbri sulla tessera elettorale che confermano. Sempre votato tutto e tu? Penso quindi che è mio diritto e dovere fare la voce grossa con tutti voi cari politici. Tu caro politico hai enplein come me? Sei sempre sempre sempre andato a votare anche per i Referendum? Penso proprio di no e penso tu non abbia tre tessere elettorali piene di timbri. Quanti italiani nella vita hanno votato tutto tutto? Sappi che anche per i referendum non sei obbligato a barrare SI oppure NO. Nel dubbio e incertezza una scheda del referendum puoi lasciarla bianca, oppure barrare SI e NO e renderla nulla e lasciar decidere agli altri e alla maggioranza se raggiungono il quorum. Esempio: Se le schede elettorali sono quattro, su una puoi barrare SI, su un altra NO, la terza la lasci bianca e non barri niente, la quarta invece la annulla e rendi scheda nulla barrando SI e NO e ci scrivi semplicemente SCHEDA NULLA con la matitina. Così facendo te ne esci a testa alta e dimostri che sei sbattuto e ti fai fare un bel timbro marcato e visibile sulla tessera elettorale. Siete proprio dei pagliacci come Francesco Rutelli!
Ho il diritto e dovere di fare la voce grossa più di te perchè ho dubbi che tu abbia votato tutto tutto nella vita.
Nel febbraio 2013, il tentativo di ricominciare a votare senza dare nulla e tentare la carta M5S, poi ad ottobre 2013 creare un progetto assieme ad altri brillini e TI per cercare di ottenere un'Inchiesta Parlamentare sui Targeted Individuals. Inizialmente ricevemmo risposte serie da Deputati e Senatori M5S viste le argomentazioni messe in campo e che sono conservate, ma poi nel giro di un anno e mezzo non si è pragmatizzato nulla sul pratico e si sono chiusi nel silenzio. Ad oggi, febbraio 2015, dopo quel febbraio 2013 che deculminerà in un abnornale Governo Letta/Alfano con PD+PDL+P2, i brillini stanno ricevendo una marea di legnate dal PD. A gennaio 2015, appena Napolitano ha terminato il mandato Renzie dichiarava ai TG: "Noi del PD non siamo comunisti, noi siamo democratici". Inutile che votiate SEL oppure Rifondazione Comunista. Sarete sempre costretti a fare coalizione col PD e saranno sempre i "democratici" a dettare legge grazie alla proporzionale. Pure voi di destra siete incu**** come i vostri antagonisti di sinistra che devono asogettarsi al PD, perchè tanto sovrasta su tutti quanti la Massoneria dei BilderBerg con i vari Mario Monti, Draghi, Bonino e tutti gli altri assieme a Massoni, Killuminati, Muratori e che continueranno con il DIVIDI ET IMPERA.
Fu pieno diritto mettere alla prova MoVimento Cinque Stelle per un qualcosa di tangibile come l'Inchiesta Parlamentare dopo nostra assidua richiesta. Chi ebbe mio voto di fiducia, visto che ha tradito le aspettative al pari della sinistra+movimenti anarchici nel 2006 (la fonte si trova su scienzamarcia.comdel buon Corrado Penna) e visto che nessuno concretizza un'Inchiesta Parlamentare sui Targeted individuals, farà sì che tornerò a votare scheda nulla per protesta come prima; così avrò sempre tutti i timbri sulla tessera elettorale e manterrò il mio enplein di avere sempre votato tutto nella vita e dimostro che non esiste nemmeno la meritrocrazia, trasperanza e correttezza brillina. Anche M5S per tali crimini finisce nei libri di historia come inabile e grazie al buon Corrado Penna con i suoi resoconti del 2006 ben conservati, fa sì che ci finiscano in mezzo ai gruppi di sinistra di tale anno. Inabili anche i brillini in questa tematica criminale che non vogliono affrontare al pari di quelli del 2006. Cosa significa meritocrazia? io a diffirenza di quasi tutta Italia ho sempre votato tutto e nonostante nostro progetto e nostra assidua richiesta da nessuno si riceve l'Inchiesta. Devo ringraziare Francesco Rutelli della Margherita (nella foto) per avermi fatto arrivare a tale ragionamento e cioè di votare sempre tutto, soprattutto i referendum a cui ho sempre creduto perchè voto popolare e decide il popolo. Nel 2003, infatti, erano stati indetti dei referendum e Rutelli in TV disse: "Andate al mare non andate a votare". Non ho disprezzato poco quell'uomo per tale dichiarazione e al mare ci posso andare dopo essere andato a votare. Io uso il mio cervello e giammai quello del Rutello ho enplein e tutti i voti e timbri sulle schede elettorali grazie a quello. Voi italioti, seguite Rutelli o chi vi pare, andate pure al mare e andate a cagxre, io intanto ho continuato a votare e le mie tessere elettorali con tutti i timbri lo possono attestare e certificare e la meritocrazia dimostra che possono andare a defecare e scheda nulla per protesta si ricomicerà a dare e uscirò sempre a testa alta dal loro seggio elettorale!
A Francè, io ce andrò sempre a votà e caccerò sempre a te e a tutto er PD+PDL+P2+PATT+M5S la scheda nulla. Poi me tengo i timbri sulla tessera e te li metto en faccia pure a te e alle tue FS! Uso il mio cervello (seppur massacrato) e non il tuo e sò annà contro corente! Lo sai con che ce vado a votà da qui in avanti? Cor pennarello (foto a sinistra) perchè non me fido delle vostre matitine pecchè cò a gomma, se pò cancellà e tanto ve rifilo scheda nulla perchè nun me cambia nulla, ma er timbro che attesta che ho votato, lo vojo come sempre. Io a differenza tua e vostra cari politisci, ho votato tutto nea vita. Voi no pecchè a tanti referenda nun c'eravate e ve fotto io a voi altri con 'na sana ideologgia del vuoto a rendere! (-_-)
Se non sei il solito coglioncello che giudica il libro dalla copertina, ma che legge ogni sua pagina, il titolo è ambiguo apposta per rimarcare che ci sono i collegamenti ipertestuali da cliccare oltre che leggere il topic invece che basasrsi su un titolo e sulla fotina e Movimento 5 Stelle si è comportato come i gruppi di sinistra e i gruppi anarchici nel 2006. Niente Inchiesta Parlamentare e ve ne potete andare assieme a Rutelli a cacare. Io mio tengo il mio enplein e le vostre parole inerenti a meritocrazia, trasparenza e correttezza sono false come Giuda! (-_-)
Avanti così perderai ancora una marea di voti come alle regionali di fine 2014 con Calabria ed Emilia-Romagna.
#vinciamonoi #vinciamopoi #vinciamomai Roba da gratta & vinci!?
Quando scenderai di brutto sotto il 5% ricorda che finirai come i radicali di Panetta Pannella che ora hanno solo 1 seggio con la BilderBerg Emma Bonino! Sarà allora che ti ricorderai che le promesse si mantengono e non si fa come i marinai. DA QUI IN AVANTI SCHEDA NULLA COME PRIMA DI FEBBRAIO 2013! (-_-)
Continua a perderti voti per strada e vedrai come vinci...
Di cosa parla qui il tuo Beppe Brillo? Mi sembra parli di controllo mentale? e che caxxo è 'sto controllo mentale? Egli è brillo e alcolizzato o sà qualcosa che non ti vuole dire il vecchio? Digli che te lo spieghi lui se almeno almeno, ha il coraggio di affrontare il tema seriamente in un suo show, visto che i suoi brillini Deputati e Senatori non sono capaci di pragmatizzare le promesse dell'Inchiesta Parlamentare su 300 italiani, dei quali, quasi tutti sono passati da tale Paolo Dorigo e lamentano trattamenti a distanza disumani al suo pari. Se volevi dimostrare di esser meglio dei comunisti e anarchici sei uguale a loro.
Beppe Grillo davanti a Montecitorio a gennaio 2013 menziona fugacemente "il controllo mentale".
เราจำหน่ายสินค้าอุปกรณ์สายลับนักสืบ online เต็มรปแบบเท่านั้น As supplier store, I provide variety staffs about Remote Neural Monitoring and V2k products that can solve all factors by professional network solution products for you.
Many people these days, especially Online, claim to sell mind control and electronic attack countermeasures and detection devices. Clearly none of whom can match the relevant highly-specialized knowledge, experience, equipment, parts, specialized materials, tools and facilities of Remote Neural Monitoring Shop.to actually be able to help mind control and electronic attack victims, and most of whom are clearly outright frauds. Further, we are the only ones we know of who now provide Advanced Transient Suppression Technology (ATST) in our mind control and electronic attack countermeasure devices. All electronic devices can be damaged or destroyed by common high-voltage transients from lightning and defective high-voltage equipment and power lines, electrical arcs and coronas, inductive kicks from high-voltage power interruptions, and static electric discharges. Also, based on what we know, mind control and electronic attack predators are increasingly resorting to directional high-pulse burst transmitters (pulse-type directed energy transmitters), possibly even EMP, to wipeout costly countermeasure devices deployed by mind control and electronic attack victims to protect themselves. Our unique countermeasure devices now come with 1,500 watts of ATST protection (at no extra cost) to foil even the most highly dedicated wipeout attack tactics, as well as to help protect you from the common forms of high-voltage transients.
Remote Neural Monitoring Shop
You can look the webboard info. and download Project Device Application Form (PDAF) for RNM&V2K device
I have received your email expressing your complaints in relation to the matters referred to.
I confirm that I am the Independent Commissioner appointed by the Archdiocese of Melbourne to enquire into allegations of sexual abuse by priests, religious and lay persons within the Archdiocese of Melbourne.
I note your serious concerns, but they do not fall within my jurisdiction. I sympathise with your concerns, but am unable to assist you.
19. NEW YORK STATEHOUSE HEARINGS REGARDING OUR ISSUES SLATED FOR FEBRUARY - 22/8/08 On Thursday, Tim in New York met with State Senator Eric Adams, a boyhood friend of his who is has recently met with some TI's regarding our issues. I wrote about him in the newsletter a couple of weeks ago. He has been reviewing informational material from us for the past 2-3 weeks.
In the meeting, Rep. Adams stated that he wants to hold hearings concerning OS/EH harassment in February. He's asking that we send a brief summary of our harassment for his review to: NYhearing@aol.com The hearing is open to the public. Therefore, anyone anywhere in New York state, the country or the globe can give their testimony or attend. For clarity and time considerations he is reviewing the summaries submitted for testimony. The location for the hearing will be New York City. The exact address has not been determined. We'll of course have a group of expert witnesses to address the senators about the technology and the psychology of the abuses as well. We've provided him a suggested list of experts who have expressed their willingness to testify. Those people he plans to contact and interview personally.
He also mentioned that he wants media involvement, which he could generate. And that this hearing would be the start of spinoff hearings in other states and would ultimately result in a congressional hearing.
It would certainly be beneficial if there were some other state representatives that could work with him on this hearing. Hopefully, we will find others who will come forward to lend their support to these issues.
One last comment: Scheduling of the hearing is the first step. Completing the hearing is the goal. And 5 1/2 months to go gives the stalkers plenty of time for mischief. Those that were around last year will remember the television show that we were all counting on, only to have it cancelled just days before taping. And the Firecracker Films documentary that never materialized. And numerous television and newspaper reporters that contacted us and never heard from again. So we've got to remember that something of this magnitude may encounter perp interference. What I'm suggesting is that for all who are believers that we need to remain in prayer for this event - for Senator Adams and for the success of the hearing. Also keep in mind that the month of February in New York could bring issues with the weather, which the perps have been known to bring on at just the exact time. So please keep all these things in mind as we pray, and pray believing. Personally, my belief is that we can only succeed in this struggle with God's help. A word to the wise is sufficient.
All this will be discussed at the conference call this Saturday night. And if there's time, Dale Wahl will join us to talk about his project.
For further questions or comments about the state hearing, please contact Tim in New York at: timothywhite2001@yahoo.com
20. SUMMARY REPORT OF MY MEETING WITH THE LAWYERS IN PARIS September 13, 2008 by Rudy Andria rudyrud2004@gmail.com
Only 3 lawyers turned up, the other 3 were held up at their offices at the last moment and briefly chatted with us on the phone.
1.They all know about the existence of various technological means which violate the fundamental human rights of innocent people , they know the existence of non lethal weapons and of highly sophisticated psychological pressures.
2.They do not have the slightest doubt about some governments' participation in influencing or even destroying the free will of some people.
3.They know that the exposure of such practices usually provokes sniggering and those who dare to complain are either made fun of or accused of paranoia. Paranoia , of course, does exist and as it is characterized by an excessive mistrust of other people's acts or an excessive mistrust of power, it affects every social relationship and makes it possible to justify exclusion .
4.Utmost rigour and precision are therefore required when exposing the attacks on the victims' integrity, privacy and freedom of thought by invisible means. . It is only by building up impeccable fact-files supported by official reports and scientific studies that public opinion worldwide can be sensitized and made aware of the problem. It is only under these conditions of rigour and precision that the 3 lawyers present will agree to put the case for the defence.
The 3 lawyers all agreed on the following points: Our difficulty is that we have practically no legal evidence of the attacks, so we have to make do with: a) statistics b) similarities in symptoms and experiences c) similarities of torture cases d) existence of weapons'patents e) existence of the technology patents for the use of V2K f) complicity of a number of psychiatrists worldwide G) the highly probable involvement of many governments ( two lawyers referred to the example of helicopters and said that not many people can afford to maintain aircrafts. Flights are logged and the airspace they are in is recorded).
Rudy Andria September 13, 2008
I've forgotten to add 1 point: the 3 lawyers think that our first help should come from the parliamentarians, because they are the ones who make the laws.
21. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – The Office of the Prosecutor
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – The Office of the Prosecutor Our Reference: OTP-CR-70/07 The Hague, Monday, 29 September 2008
Dear Sir/Madam
On behalf of the Prosecutor, I thank you for your communication received 21/2/2007, as well as any subsequent related information.
As you may know, the International Criminal Court (“the ICC” or “the Court”) is governed by the Rome Statute, which entrusts the court with a very specific and carefully defined jurisdiction and mandate. A fundamental feature of the Rome Statute is that the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, namely genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, as defined in the Rome Statute (Articles 6 to 8). The Court may only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on or after 1 July 2002 (Article 11). In addition, the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a State that has accepted the jurisdiction of the Court or by a national of such a State (Article 12), or where the Security Council refers the situation to the Court 9Article 13).
Accordingly, I regret to advise you that your communication appears to relate to matters outside the jurisdiction of the Court. The Prosecutor has therefore confirmed that there is not a basis at this time to proceed with further analysis. The information you have submitted will be maintained in our archives, and the decision not to proceed may be reconsidered if new facts or evidence provide a reasonable basis to believe that a crime the jurisdiction of the Court has been committed.
I hope you will appreciate that with the defined jurisdiction of the Court, many serious allegations will be beyond the reach of this institution to address, I note in this regard that the ICC is designed to complement, not replace national jurisdictions. Thus, if you wish to pursue this matter further, you may consider raising it with other appropriate national or international authorities.
I am grateful for your interest in the ICC. If you would like to learn more about the work of the ICC, I invite you to visit our website at www.icc-cpi.int .
John Finch 5/8 Kemp Street, Thornbury, Vic, 3071, Australia
Yours sincerely {signature}
M.P. Dillon Head of the Information & Evidence Unit Office of the Prosecutor
JIM GUEST STATE REPRESENTATIVE MISSOURI DISTRICT ADDRESS P.O. BOX 412, KING CITY, MO 64463 Tel: 660-535-6664
To Whom It May Concern:
I have worked for 3 years with Microwave and Electronic Harassment victims throughout the US and overseas. It is hard for others to understand the technology that is being used to destroy people’s lives. I know James because he contacted me for help. James has worked to find proof of what has happened to him.
Many victims try hard to get help from professional doctors to help find devices such as Veri-Chip. I would request that you and those who can make a difference would help James and others to find answers.
5th District State Representative
23..THE TAOISEACH OF IRELAND - 8/10/08
Dear Mr. Finch,
I wish to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail of 3 October 2008 which will be brought to the Taoiseach's attention as soon as possible.
Yours sincerely,
David King Assistant Private Secretary to the Taoiseach
The Department of the Taoiseach is committed to providing a professional, efficient and courteous service to all our customers. To view the Customer Charter, please click on http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie/index.asp?1ocID=181&docID=1762
23. MR NIGEL FARRAGE, MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party),BRUSSELS, EUROPE 30/1/09
Dear Mr Finch
Thank you for this account of your hideous experiences and the technology, which might have been used to occasion them.
The UK Independence Party is supporting the initiative, by Dr Walter Madlinger, to demonstrate such matters to an expert audience, at the Ettlingen Conference on Non-Lethal Weapons, on 11th May, this year, and I would encourage you to attend, if you are not already planning to do so.
24. MR ANTHONY ROMERO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ACLU, 13/2/09
Dear John,
Thank you for speaking out against the abuse of the "state secrets" doctrine. We know your time is limited, and we appreciate your efforts to protect civil liberties.
The ACLU works daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country. We need your support now more than ever as we work to restore liberties lost over the last eight years. If you have a moment, please make a donation today. Visit www.aclu.org/donate.
Thanks again for taking action. We'll keep you up-to-date on this important legislation.
25. MR NIKIFOROUS DIAMANDOUROS, THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN, 28/5/09 S2009-104176 STRASBOURG 8/5/09 COMPLAINT NUMBER: 1568/2006/(AVM)OV
Dear Sir (Mr John Finch)
I am writing in reply of your email of 9 April 2009 in which you come back on your earlier complaint 1568/2006/(AVM)OV.
You allege that some extreme and horrendous criminality is being conducted by agencies related to the US government with the complicity of many other government and security agencies. You state that victims as you are being subjected to torture and mental and physical destruction and that this has remained completely unreported. You state that, more particularly, you are being completely mutilated and neutralised by electro-magnetic radiation and that you are “brain-broadcasted”.
As I already informed you in my letters of 22 June and 14 September 2006, I have unfortunately no power to intervene in this matter, because your allegations are not directed against a European Union institution or body.
However given that you are residing in Australia, I would like to repeat my earlier advice that, in case you have an allegation against an Australian government agency, you might consider contacting the Australian Ombudsman:
Commonwealth Ombudsman National Office GPO Box 442, Canberra ACT 2601 Ground Floor, I Farrell Place Canberra City ACT 2600 http://www.comb.gov.au ombudsman@ombudsman.gov.au
I regret I cannot be of further assistance.
Yours sincerely,
P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOROUS The European Ombudsman 1 Ave President Robert Schumann – CS 30403 – F-67001 strasbourg Cedex TEL: 33 (0)3.88.172313 – fax: 33 (0)3.88.179062 http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu – eo@ombudsman.europa.eu
26. THE PREMIER OF NSW, AUSTRALIA, 6/8/09
EA1470971 – HSJB
Dear Mr Finch
The Premier has received your recent email concerning your reported experiences in Russia, Turkey and China.
As the subject you have raised primarily relates to areas of Australian Government responsibility, Mr Rees is unable to be of direct assistance.
Accordingly, the opportunity has been taken to bring the terms of your approach to the attention of the Australian Government.
Yours sincerely Emanuel Sklavounos for Director General
27. PROF. DR. ADRIAN EUGEN HOLLAENDER, CENTER OF LEGAL RESEARCH, UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA, 11/8/09
CENTER OF LEGAL RESEARCH, Prof. Dr. Adrian Eugen Hollaender, Chairman of The Austrian Fundamental Rights Conference, Human Rights Seminar Instructor at the University of Vienna
Dear Mr. Finch:
With great concern, I have read your complaint about ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS TORTURE, DEGRADATION AND MUTILATION CASE.
If you wish, I could examine the case under the legal perspective and write a legal expertise on it that you can use in the complaint procedures.
28. MR NIKIFOROUS DIAMANDOUROS, THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN, 11/9/09 S2009-104176 STRASBOURG 8/5/09 COMPLAINT NUMBER: 1568/2006/(AVM)OV
Dear Sir (Mr John Finch)
I am writing in reply to your emails of 10, 11, 17 and 18 August 2009 in which you come back on your earlier complaint 1568/2006/(AVM)OV concerning your “directed energy and neurological weapons torture, degradation and mutilation case” you also sent me a “list of the crimes committed by the NWO criminals”.
As I already informed you in my letters 22 June and 14 September 2006, and 8 May 2009, I unfortunately have no power to intervene in this matter.
I regret that I cannot be of further assistance to you in this case Yours sincerely,
P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOROUS The European Ombudsman 1 Ave President Robert Schumann – CS 30403 – F-67001 strasbourg Cedex TEL: 33 (0)3.88.172313 – fax: 33 (0)3.88.179062 http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu – eo@ombudsman.europa.eu
29. MR MARTIN FERGUSON, MEMBER OF AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT, 7/1/10
REF: MF/MK (2010/01/07)
Dear Mr Finch
Further to our recent meeting, I have written to the Attorney General, Robert McClelland requesting that your suspicion about constant monitoring of your life by ASIO and the Australian Federal Police be investigated.
You will be advised of any response I receive from the Attorney General.
Best wishes for 2010
Yours sincerely MARTIN FERGUSON AM MP Federal Member for Batman, Minister for Resource and Energy, Minister for Tourism www.martinferguson.com.au
30. MR IAN CARNELL, INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, AUSTRALIA, 24/3/10
Correspondence reference: 2010/505 File reference: 2009/62 24 March 2010
Thank you for your email of 16 March 2010 asking for protection from surveillance, torture and abuse. I have read your email and note that you believe you are being tortured and abused by ‘directed energy and neuroligical weapons’ by United States government agencies with the complicity of other governments and security agencies.
Before responding to your specific concerns, it is appropriate that I inform you a little about the role and functions of my office.
The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) has general oversight responsibilities for each of the six Australian intelligence agencies. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) is Australia’s domestic security agency and is therefore the Australian intelligence agency most likely to have interaction with Australian persons. The focus of ASIO’s work is on countering terrorism, discouraging people who may act violently for political reasons, and discouraging people who seek to clandestinely obtain sensitive government information or otherwise harm Australia’s interests in order to further their own causes or the interests of foreign governments.
Other ASIO functions include collecting foreign intelligence within Australia, and providing security assessments and protective security advice.
Based on my experience as IGIS for nearly six years, I can assure you that neither ASIO nor any agency within the Australian Intelligence Community (AIC) has the resources, motivation or legal authority to harm individuals in the way you describe.
I am confident in making this assertion because ASIO and the other AIC agencies are each subjected to intensive and frequent review by this office, to ensure that they conduct their business within the bounds of the law, and in a professional and ethical manner. I can also assure you that the inspection regime undertaken by my office is very thorough.
You have also raised the possibility that a foreign intelligence service might be involved in the activities you described. ASIO has a functional interest in monitoring any such activity, and in turn my office closely examines ASIO’s activities in this area. On the basis of the material available to me, I do not believe that they are negligent in this regard.
I should also tell you that I do not have any jurisdiction over any foreign intelligence services, but despite this would regard it as highly improbable that they would target any member of the Australian public who is simply going about their ordinary business.
While I don’t doubt that you have experienced a range of issues that are of concern to you, none of the AIC agencies have the capabilities or motivation to do what you describe.
If you believe you have been the subject of a crime, you have the option of discussing this with your local police.
While my office is unable to directly assist you, I nonetheless hope that the above information is both helpful and reassuring to you.
On behalf of Ian Carnell, Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security
Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security P +61 2 6271 5692 | F +61 2 6271 5696 | www.igis.gov.au
31. EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN, PETER BONNOR HEAD OF REGISTRY, 13/3/12
Directorate A Registry 13/3/12 COMPLAINT O497/2012/MF
Dear Mr Finch
I am writing in reply to your email of 1st March in which you complained about alleged acts of torture by electronic weapons and mutilations on certain people …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Having concluded that your complaint is outside the European Ombudsman’s mandate, I wish you every success in finding a positive outcome to the matter you raised in your complaint.
Yours Sincerely Peter Bonnor Head of Registry European Ombudsman
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Euro-Ombudsman <EO@ombudsman.europa.eu> wrote:
Dear Mr Murray,
I am writing in reply to your e-mail of 19 April 2012 in which you asked for help in your matter concerning among others mind control.
I would like to inform you that the role of the European Ombudsman is to investigate complaints alleging maladministration in the activities of the European institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, such as the European Commission and the European Parliament. No action by any other authority or person may be the subject of a complaint to the Ombudsman. Only EU citizens or residents in the territory of the Union may lodge a complaint with the European Ombudsman (Art. 2 (2) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman.
From the above also follows that the Ombudsman is not in a position to help you in your matter, since it does not fall within his mandate.
I hope this information suits you well.
Best regards,
European Ombudsman
Zuzana Vaníčková
T. +33 (0)3 88 17 23 28
zuzana.vanickova@ombudsman.europa.eu
1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman, CS 30403, F - 67001 Strasbourg Cedex T. + 33 (0)3 88 17 23 13 F. + 33 (0)3 88 17 90 62 www.ombudsman.europa.eu
From: joe murray [mailto:democracynotfascism@gmail.com] Sent: 26 April 2012 03:27
To: Euro-Ombudsman
Subject: Re: Please help us to get this electronic torture, abuse and experimentation stopped
thanks - I'm an EU (UK) citizen and I'm complaining about maladministration in the EU Instititutions and Agencies that are supposed to protect us from these tortures and abuses.
For example the ECHR and EUROPOL.
sincerely
john finch
From: Euro-Ombudsman <EO@ombudsman.europa.eu>
Date: Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:39 PM
Subject: RE: Please help us to get this electronic torture, abuse and experimentation stopped
To: joe murray <democracynotfascism@gmail.com>
Dear Mr Finch,
Thank you for your further e-mail. From the information provided, it is not clear what are exactly your allegation(s) and claim(s) and against which institutions you wish to complaint against.
I would like to reiterate in this regards that complaint concerning ECHR is outside the Ombudsman's remit. Please note, in this regard, that the European Court of Human Rights was established by the European Convention on Human Rights, signed by the Member States of the Council of Europe. The European Court of Human Rights was not created by or under the EU Treaties and, consequently, it is not a European Union institution, body, office or agency. The European Ombudsman is therefore not entitled to deal with complaints against the European Court of Human Rights.
Should you nevertheless wish to complain to the Ombudsman, you are free to do so. However, please note that the complaint shall be made within two years of the date on which the facts on which it is based came to the attention of the person lodging the complaint and must be preceded by the appropriate administrative approaches to the institutions and bodies concerned (Art. 2 (4) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman). Moreover, the facts of the complaint must not be, or have been, subject to judicial proceedings (Art. 1 (3) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman).
If these criteria are fulfilled and you wish to complain against an EU institution, you could consider using the form for complaints, available on the Ombudsman's website:
The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) has received your June 28, 2011, January 15, and April 18, 2012 emails regarding electronic torture, abuse and experimentation.
OHRP has responsibility for oversight of compliance with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations for the protection of human research subjects (see 45 CFR Part 46 at http://www.dhhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm). In carrying out this responsibility, OHRP evaluates, at OHRP’s discretion, substantive allegations of noncompliance involving human subject research projects conducted or supported by HHS or that are otherwise subject to the regulations (see OHRP memorandum dated October 14, 2009 at http://www.dhhs.gov/ohrp/compliance/ohrpcomp.pdf for an explanation of OHRP’s jurisdiction).
OHRP has jurisdiction only if the allegations involve human subject research (a) conducted or supported by HHS, or (b) conducted at an institution holding an applicable Assurance of Compliance with the HHS regulations.
Neither of these conditions appear to be met by the circumstances described in your letter. Therefore, OHRP will not be able to pursue the matter on your behalf.
OHRP appreciates your concern about the protection of human research subjects.
Sincerely, Kristina C. Borror, Ph.D. Director, Division of Compliance Oversight
We regret to inform you that Amnesty International is unable to offer you any assistance as your case does not fall within our areas of work.
We do understand your concerns and desire that action be taken. However, our work is determined by the framework established by Amnesty International members at a global level, and all individual cases that we work on must fall within the terms established by our statute. This does not mean that we consider certain types of human rights, or human rights abuses, to be more important than others. Nor does it mean that we have reached any conclusion as to whether you may have been the victim of a human rights violation. Rather, it means that we must, to be as effective as possible, channel our limited resources towards those areas of work which we have identified as priorities.
We regret that we are unable to assist you, and we do understand the disappointment this must cause. However, we hope you are able to understand the reasons behind this. We do hope that you are able to find the help that you need elsewhere, and that your situation improves.
If you wish to check which kinds of cases Amnesty International can deal with, please check our web page locatedat:
34. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, COMMITTEE ON PETITIONS, 24/8/12
Erminia Mazzoni Chairman, Committee on Petitions European Parliament B-1047 Brussels tel: 32 2 2842111 fax: 32 2 2846844
PETITION NUMBER: 0392/2012
I acknowledge the receipt of your recent correspondence dated 14/6/12 to the Committee on Petitions.
This will be added to the file of Mr Babacek on alleged use of mind control systems in the EU
(they then included this copy of the letter sent to Mr Mojmir Babacek on 19/7/12)
Dear Mr Babacek
Thank you for having submitted your petition to the European Parliament for its consideration. It was examined in order to assess whether the issue which you raise, falls clearly within the fields of activity of the European Union for which we are competent.
Unfortunately, I have to inform you that this was not the case, and I am therefore obliged to file your request without being able to take matters any further, pursuant to Article 201 (8) of our Rules of Procedure.
yours sincerely
Erminia Mazzoni Chairman Committee on Petitions
35. THE BILL OF RIGHTS DEFENSE COMMITTEE, 18/9/12
from: Bill of Rights Defense Committee bordc@mail.democracyinaction.org, info@bordc.org, to: john finch tijohnfinch@gmail.org date: Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7.23am Re: TO THE BILL OF RIGHTS DEFENSE COMMITTEE – We are a group of over 1300 electronic torture, abuse and experimentation victims – please assist us
Dear John,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
The Bill of Rights Defense Committee advocates and organizes grassroots support for constitutional rights based on the facts reported by national media. We simply don't have the resources to do investigative journalism.
Therefore, BORDC has no institutional position on whether mind control is happening. We take the facts as they're reported, and build a grassroots response.
Wishing all of you the very best,
Barbara --- Barbara Haugen, Administrator Bill of Rights Defense Committee 8 Bridge Street, Suite A Northampton, MA 01060 413-582-0110 www.bordc.org
36. INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES, 26/9/12
from: International Federation Secretariat secretariat@ifrc.org to: john finch <tijohnfinch@gmail.com date: Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:34 PM subject: RE: TO THE RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT - MY ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE, TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION CASE SUMMARY mailed by: ifrc.org
Sir/Madam,
Your email has reached the International Federation based in Geneva, Switzerland.
Your message has been received and read with concern. Although we would like to help, we regret to inform you that the Secretariat of the International Federation is not in a position to assist you on this matter.
For your information, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies is a federation of National Societies which works to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity. For doing this, it operates through and in agreement with National Societies and does not respond to individuals for personal assistance.
We suggest, therefore, that you contact the National Society based in your country and submit your request for support directly to them. Contact addresses can be found on our web site in the "directory" section. http://www.ifrc.org/address/directory.asp
We hope that you can find the support you need and wish you all the best.
Regards, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
37. ACLU - THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, OREGON, 29/9/12 ACLU – American Civil Liberties Union PO Box 40585, Portland, Oregon, 97240 (503) 227 3186 www. aclu-or.org
Thank you for contacting the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon. As you may know, the ACLU of Oregon is a small, private, non-profit organization funded entirely by private donations. Typically, the cases we accept are handled by lawyers in private practice who donate their time. As a result, we offer legal assistance in only a small number of cases each year.
Consequently, we must choose cases that most clearly invoke significant civil rights and civil liberties issues. We focus on protecting the rights of individuals to be free from excessive government intrusion and the right to receive equal protection under the law. These liberties include the rights of freedom of speech, press and religion, the right to be treated equally and without discrimination on the basis of race and sex, and the right to be free of abusive police conduct. Among these cases, we are forced to limit our representation to “impact cases” i.e., those that present new legal issues or affect large numbers of people.
We cannot assist in cases that depend on establishing facts. We are generally unable to get involved in disputes between private parties, with private employers, or private organizations. We also cannot intervene in a situation where an attorney has already been retained unless the attorney personally requests assistance, and even then, all the other criteria are still in place.
Based on the above criteria, we have concluded the ACLU is unable to provide you assistance. Please be assured, however, that this does not reflect on the worthiness of your case.
I have enclosed the ACLU of Oregon’s Referral and Information sheet. One of the organizations listed may be able to assist you. I regret we are unable to help you further.
Sincerely (signature) Kevin Diaz Legal Director
Enclosure: ACLU OF Oregon Referrals and Information
38. THEPRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION FOR THE STUDY OF BIOETHICAL ISSUES - PCSBI, 27/7/11
1425 New York Avenue, NW, Suite C-100, Washington, DC 20005 PHONE 202-233-3960 FAX 202-233-3990 WWW.BIOETHICS.GOV
July 27, 2011
Dear Commenter:
We are writing to advise you on our ongoing work and plans for the next meeting of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. We appreciate the time that you have taken to engage with us.
We would like to clarify for your information that the Commission is not investigating or reviewing any concerns or complaints concerning claims about targeted individuals. This includes claims concerning: MK-ULTRA; COINTELPRO; electromagnetic torture or attacks; organized stalking; remove influencing; microwave harassment; covert harassment and surveillance; human tracking; psychotronic or psychotropic weapons and radio frequency or military weapons or other claims.
As such the Commission will not hear further testimony on these subjects. Many of these issues have been investigated in the past. The Commission is not a law enforcement, regulatory or legislative body. It does not control any federal monies. In addition, the Commission has no involvement with the public or private grants and has no power to open or undertake criminal cases.
As advisors to the President, we will ensure that all of your concerns, information and testimony are provided to the White House. We sincerely appreciate your interest in the work of the Commission and the time you have taken to share your personal history with us.
Sincerely signature
Valerie H. Bonham Executive Director
39. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – ICC- , THE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, 27/11/12
On behalf of the Prosecutor, I acknowledge receipt of your communication received on 1/10/2012.
According to our records, you have sent three or more communications to the Office of the Prosecutor dealing with matters which are substantially the same as those already examined by it.
As noted in our previous responses, the matter described in your communication does not appear to fall within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (“the Court”), and the Prosecutor has confirmed that there is not a basis to proceed with further analysis in the absence of new facts or evidence.
The Office has carefully examined your latest communication and has re-confirmed that it does not introduce new facts or evidence altering the conclusion that there is not a basis to proceed under the Statute.
I hope you will understand that the Court is governed by Rome Statute, which provides a very specific and carefully defined jurisdiction and mandate over the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, under strict conditions specified under the Statute. As a result, many serious allegations will be beyond the reach of this institution to address.
Please understand that, given our carefully defined mandate and limited resources, where a person submits a succession of communications or seeks repeatedly to introduce the same matter, the Office is not able to continue further correspondence with that person on subsequent related communications.
Yours Sincerely
M.P. Dillon Head of the Information & Evidence Unit Office of the Prosecutor
PO Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands TEL: +31 70 5158515 FAX: +31 70 5158555
www. icc-cpi.int
40. OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (OHCHR), 5/12/12
from: Petitions OHCHR <petitions@ohchr.org> to: JUAN LACHESIS <tilachesis@gmail.com> date: Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:12 PM subject: Re: Fw: Dear Torture Victims and Friends - Attached are our updated over 1400 electronic torture, abuse and experimentation victims’ case summaries
Dear Sir,
Thank you for alerting us to your case. We have examined your email with attention and we nonetheless regret that the United Nations Secretariat is unable to assist you in the circumstances of your case.
Yours sincerely,
Petitions and Inquiries Section (Section des requêtes et des enquêtes) Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Pallais des Nations CH-1211 Genève 10 Switzerland Fax: +41 22 9179022
41. OPEN SOCIETY JUSTICE INITIATIVE, OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATION, 20/2/13
Many thanks for your email, requesting help from the Open Society Justice Initiative .
We appreciate that you consider us a source for help and are always willing to provide assistance to victims within our reach whom we can provide expert assistance to. However, it is unfortunate that on this occasion the Open Society Justice Initiative cannot provide you the assistance you require, as we do not work in this field at the present moment.
We hope you find the support you require and sincere apologies,
Best Regards,
Heena Khaled | Administrative Associate |Open Society Justice Initiative
42. OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (OHCHR), 26/2/13
from: Petitions OHCHR petitions@ohchr.org to: MCmailteam International mcmailteam@gmail.com date: 26 februari 2013 05:26 subject: Re: DEAR MS NAVANETHEM PILLAY and the OHCHR - 中国受害者告全世界人民书 An Announcement To The Whole World By Chinese Victims Of Directed Energy And Psychotronic Weapons
Dear Sir or Madam,
We acknowledge receipt of your message of 22 February 2013. May we suggest that you refer to our website for information about the procedures for the examination of individual petitions on human rights violations : www.ohchr.org, (direct link http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FactSheet7Rev.1en.pdf). If you have difficulty accessing our website, please write to the OHCHR, Information Office PW-RS-011, 1211 Geneva 10, and ask for Human Rights Fact Sheets Nos. 7, 12, 15 and 17.
Please carefully examine the information referred to above and, if you think that your complaint falls within a mandate of one of the UN treaty-bodies, resubmit it to this treaty-body (Committee) with duly filled-in complaint form and copies of all supporting documents.
Sincerely, A staff member of the Petitions and Inquiries Section Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Pallais des Nations CH-1211 Genève 10 Switzerland
The President of the European Parliament (EP), Mr Martin Schulz, has received your message concerning Parliamentary Resolution A4-0005/99 and the progress since its adoption.
The Citizens' Enquiry Service of the EP has been asked to reply.
On 6 March 2008, a written question was put to the Commission, asking what action has been taken by the EU since this call was made. If you wish to read the question in full, as well as the Commission's reply, please consult the following webpage.
Since you also refer to the recent NSA surveillance issues, please note that this was a subject of debate at the plenary session in the European Parliament on 3 July. If you wish to consult the debate in full, please click here.
In this regard, the EP adopted a resolutionon 4 July which was approved by 483 votes to 98 with 65 abstentions. According to the press releaseon 8 July, the resolution instructs the EP's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs(LIBE) to conduct an "in-depth" enquiry into the US surveillance programmes, including the bugging of EU institutions and other spying allegations. The President of the EP, as well as political group leaders, formally confirmed the launch of the enquiry.
In the first hearing, held on 5 September, concerns were voiced by MEPs and key journalists on the impact of US National Security Agency and other surveillance programmes on EU citizens' privacy and media freedom and the lack of democratic oversight of these programmes. For further information, please consult this link.
Finally, to stay informed about the EP's current and future activities please consult our website.
We hope this is of interest and thank you for contacting the European Parliament.
Yours sincerely, Citizens' Enquiry Service European Parliament ref=10844
44. The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), KRISTINA BORROR, DIRECTOR, 6/11/13
Dear Mr. Finch:
The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) has received your November 03, 2013 concerning your experiences.
OHRP has responsibility for oversight of compliance with the Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations for the protection of human research subjects (see 45 CFR Part 46 at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html). In carrying out this responsibility, OHRP evaluates, at OHRP’s discretion, substantive allegations of noncompliance involving human subject research projects conducted or supported by HHS or that are otherwise subject to the regulations (see OHRP memorandum dated October 14, 2009 at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/compliance/ohrpcomp.pdf for an explanation of OHRP’s jurisdiction).
OHRP has determined that it does not have jurisdiction over the matters referenced in your letter. Therefore, OHRP will not be able to pursue this matter on your behalf.
OHRP appreciates your concern about the protection of human research subjects.
Sincerely, Kristina C. Borror, Ph.D. Director Division of Compliance Oversight Borror, Kristina C (HHS/OASH) Kristina.Borror@hhs.gov
45. The Justice Ministry of Denmark, 16/12/13
Ministry of Justice Date: 16 December 2013 Office: Security and Prevention Division Contact: Christian Lund Hansen Our ref..: 2013-1914-0082 Doc.: 1007043
The Ministry of Justice has received your e-mail of 18 November 2013 regarding surveillance. The ministry has read your e-mail but does not find reason to take further action in light of your enquiry.
46. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – ICC- , THE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, 9/4/14
From OTP InformationDesk OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int
To John Finch <tilachesis@gmail.com>, mcmailteam <MCmailteam@gmail.com>
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for your message. Please note that the International Criminal Court has a very limited jurisdiction. The Court may only address the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes as defined by Articles 6 to 8 of the Rome Statute that have occurred after 2002, and can only exercise jurisdiction in the countries that have ratified it. For more information on the Court’s jurisdiction and the full text of the Rome Statute, please refer to page 2 of the attached document and our website, www.icc-cpi.int. We encourage you to carefully review this information.
If, after your careful review, you still believe the ICC is the correct place for your case and would like to submit a claim to the Court, then please follow the directions for how to do so on page 1 of the attached document. If you decide to submit information, kindly use only this email address : otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int.
Kind regards, OTP Information Desk International Criminal Court
Re: [#VX-M9271] NON-CONSENSUAL EXPERIMENTATION WITH ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS
Thank you for contacting the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).
Unfortunately, the situation you describe is outside of EFF's area of focus. And we will not be able to represent you. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is a small, grassroots legal advocacy non-profit focused on defending civil liberties and constitutional rights online with very limited resources. EFF focuses on impact litigation at the federal level--usually questions or legal concepts never before seen by the courts. As such, we have a very important but narrowly focused mission and are not equipped to address all issues outside that limited scope. However, your local bar association should be able to refer you to an attorney for an initial consultation for a small fee.
I am sorry that we are unable to directly represent you and wish you the best of luck.
Posted by JOHN FINCH on February 4, 2015 at 7:29am
DEAR TORTURE VICTIMS & FRIENDS We hope you're ok.
THE RESPONSES WE HAVE RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIES 2004-2015 & RECAP OF OUR ACTIVISM SINCE JANUARY 2008:-
After having submitted OURELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATIONCASES and numerous other letters & Petitions detailing the most extreme and totalitarian violations of human rights in human history to most Governments, Security/Intelligence Agencies, International Organizations, Religious Organisations, Human Rights Organizations, Universities, Scientific and other Institutions, and the International Media all over the world - over and over and over again - appealing for assistance, protection and/or publicity we have received the responses listed below.
Other TARGETED INDIVIDUALS, all over the world, who are being subjected to similar torture and abuse, have had their appeals for justice, protection, assistance and/or publicity similarly almost completely ignored and/or suppressed – whether presented as GROUP PETITIONS or INDIVIDUALLY!!
Some of our ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION CASES detail the most extreme and totalitarian violations of human rights in human history, including the most horrendous psychological tortures, rapes, sexual abuse, surgical mutilations, ‘mind control’, and other mental and physical mutilations:-
There are MANY, MANY others, all over the world, who are being subjected to similar torture and abuse.
These are extreme and monstrous CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY – indescribably terrible in themselves – coupled with the ORWELLIAN secrecy and denial of any support at all that we are experiencing, makes them even more horrendous and monstrous.
Some TARGETED INDIVIDUALS have been attempting to gain assistance, protection and/or publicity about these crimes since the 1990s - and even earlier - this extends as far back into the history of illegal "scientific and medical" testing and experimentation as COINTELPRO, MKULTRA and the DUPLESSIS ORPHANS - and further.
TARGETED INDIVIDUAL and a member of THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION
THE RESPONSES - 2004-2015:-
1. EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, STRASBOURG, EUROPE 2006
Application no. 48661/06
"Dear Sir
I write to inform you that on 15 May 2007 the European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Committee of three judges (E. Myjer, President, E.Fura-Sandstrom and I.Ziemele) pursuant to Article 27 of the Convention, decided under Article 28 of the Convention to declare the above application inadmissable because it did not comply with the requirements set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention.
In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of were within its competence, the Court found that they did not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.
This decision is final and not subject to any appeal to either the Court, including its Grand Chamber, or any other body. You will therefore appreciate that the Registry will be unable to provide any further details about the Committee's deliberations or to conduct further correspondence relating to its decision in this case. You will receive no further documents from the Court concerning this case and, in accordance with the Court's instructions, the file will be destroyed one year after the date of the decision.
The present communication is made pursuant to Rule 53 & 2 of the Rules of Court.
yours faithfully For the Committee S. Naismith Deputy Section Registrar" 2006
2. MR HANS-GERT PÖTTERING, PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, BRUSSELS, EUROPE 2007
A(2007)8511/AT/ssk
"Dear Mr. Finch,
I am writing in reference to your e-mail to the President of the European Parliament.
On behalf of Mr Hans-Gert Pöttering, I thank you for the information you have provided and I can assure you that it has been noted and read with interest.
While the European Parliament supports research activities aimed at creating the knowledge society and strengthening the scientific and technological bases of the Community industry, it has always pointed out the need to respect fundamental ethical principles, including those reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. With regard to the seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013), the Parliament has stated in particular that the opinions of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies are and will continue to be taken into account. You may wish to read more details at the following Internet addresses:
Yours sincerely, Jean-Louis COUGNON Head of Division European Parliament General Directorate for Information Correspondence with Citizens Unit" 2007
3.INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, THE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, THE HAGUE, EUROPE 2007
“Dear Sir, Madam
The Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court acknowledges receipt of you documents/letter.
This communication has been duly entered in the Communications Register of the Office. We will give consideration to this communication, as appropriate, in accordance with the provisions of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
As soon as a decision is reached, we will inform you, in writing, and provide you with reasons for this decision.
Yours sincerely
….(illegible) …..
Head of Information and Evidence Unit Office of the Prosecutor” 2007
see below for their written “decision”.
4. CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS INTERNATIONAL, LOS ANGELES, USA 2007
"Dear Mr. Finch:
Thank you for contacting the Citizens Commission on Human Rights International.
Your abuse documentation is now in our data files. A pattern of abuse may be established by amassing documentation such as yours.
Please understand that CCHR is not a law enforcement or legal agency in any way. We are not an attorney referral service, cannot bring lawsuits against individuals and do not have law enforcement powers. However, we do work with such officials by gathering information such as yours, filing complaints, offering research and other assistance. Any actions performed by CCHR are done as a free public service--we do not charge for our services.
If you decide that you want to file a complaint against a specific psychiatrist or facility, you should send us a full written statement with specific information – names, dates, places, etc. describing the abuse that occurred. If you have questions upon reviewing this letter please contact us.
Lorita O'Leary, CCHR Abuse Case Documenter Citizens Commission on Human Rights International 6616 Sunset Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90028 (800) 869-CCHR (2247) http://www.cchr.org/index.cfm humanrights@cchr.org
5. MS PATSY SÖRENSEN, FORMER MEMBER EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT & a DIRECTOR of “PAYOKE” (NGO) 2007
"Dear all,
This is just to let everyone know we do take this phenomenon seriously and are looking into ways in which we can convince relevant people to take it seriously as well. We would like to thank all the people who have send in their stories, and will keep you informed if not directly then through Monika Stoces.
Hiermit möchten wir allen wissen lassen das wir dieses phenomen ernst nimmen und versuchen werden andere relevante personen es auch ernst nemen zu lassen. Wir mochten auch gern jeden danken die ihre geschichten gemaild hatten, wir sollen sie informieren uber unsere befindungen von hier oder via Monika Stoces.
kind regards, Gert Nuyts (assistent) Patsy Sörensen,Payoke NGO Leguit 4,2000 Antwerpen, Belgium T. 0032-3-201.16.90 EMAIL:Patsy.sorensen@payoke.be www.payoke.be
6. THE CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, NEW YORK, USA 2006/7
17/4/08 - no response at all although they have recently filed the following "tip-of-the-iceberg" lawsuit:-
"CCR Files Suit over NSA Domestic Spying Program Center for Constitutional Rights Believes Privileged Attorney-Client Communications Were Intercepted by NSA without Warrants
Synopsis
In New York, on January 17, 2006, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) filed a lawsuit against President George W. Bush, the head of the National Security Agency (NSA), and the heads of the other major security agencies, challenging the NSA's surveillance of persons within the United States without judicial approval or statutory authorization. The suit seeks an injunction that would prohibit the government from conducting warrantless surveillance of communications in the U.S. CCR filed the suit in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York on its own behalf and on behalf of CCR attorneys and legal staff representing clients who fit the criteria described by the Attorney General for targeting under the NSA Surveillance Program.
As has been widely reported, for over four years the NSA, with the approval of the president, has engaged in a program of widespread warrantless electronic surveillance of telephone calls and emails in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The suit argues that the NSA Surveillance Program violates a clear criminal law, exceeds the president's authority under Article II of the Constitution, and violates the First and Fourth Amendments. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act explicitly authorizes foreign intelligence electronic surveillance only upon orders issued by federal judges on a special court. It expressly authorizes warrantless wiretapping only for the first fifteen days of a war, and makes it a crime to engage in wiretapping without specific statutory authority. Rather than seeking to amend this statute, the president simply violated it by authorizing warrantless wiretapping of Americans without statutory authority or court approval. As a result,the President violated his oath of office to take care that the laws of this nation are faithfully executed, and instead secretly violated a criminal prohibition duly enacted by Congress.
CCR has been one of the most active opponents of the illegal detention, torture and intelligence gathering practices this administration instituted in the wake of the terrorist attacks of 9/11. As part of its mission to fight violations of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, the Center for Constitutional Rights represents hundreds of men detained indefinitely without charge as "enemy combatants" at Guantanamo Bay; Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen accused of al Qaeda ties and rendered from the United States to Syria for the purpose of being tortured; and Muslim immigrants unreasonably and wrongfully detained in the U.S. for months without probable cause or criminal charges in the wake of 9/11.
In the course of representing these clients, the Center's lawyers have engaged in innumerable telephone calls and e-mails with people outside the United States, including their clients, their clients'families and outside lawyers, potential witnesses, and others. Given that the government has accused many of CCR's overseas clients of being associated with Al Qaeda or of interest to the 9/11 investigation, there is little question that these attorneys have been subject to the NSA Surveillance Program. The Center filed today's lawsuit in order to protect CCR attorneys' right to represent their clients free of unlawful and unchecked surveillance.
CCR Legal Director Bill Goodman said, "On this, the day following Martin Luther King Day, we are saddened that the illegal electronic surveillance that once targeted that great American has again become characteristic of our present government. As was the case with Dr. King, this illegal activity is cloaked in the guise of national security. In reality, it reflects an attempt by the Bush Administration to exercise unchecked power without the inconvenient interference of the other co-equal branches of government."
According to CCR attorney Shayana Kadidal, "The mere existence of the program harms CCR and our attorneys because it serves to inhibittheir ability to institute and effectively litigate these suits."
The Center for Constitutional Rights is represented in the suit by CCR attorneys Bill Goodman, Shayana Kadidal, and Michael Ratner, and CCR cooperating attorney David Cole. Also appearing as an attorney
for CCR, is Professor Michael Avery, president of the National Lawyers Guild (NLG), on behalf of the NLG." 2007
7. USA REPRESENTATIVE JIM GUEST’S (MO) LETTER 10/10/2007
“October 10, 2007 Dear Member of the Legislature and Friends:
This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violations and physical injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use of Verichip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans. . . . . .”
LAMBETH PALACE Mr Andrew Nunn Correspondence Secretary to the Archbishop of Canterbury
OUR REF: 63443 22 MAY 2008 Mr Rudy Andria Paris, France
Dear Mr Andria
The Archbishop of Canterbury has asked me to write thanking you for your 19th May letter, but to say with regret that he is not in a position to help. He is sorry about that.
Yours Sincerely (signature)
LAMBETH PALACE, LONDON SE1 7JU
14. MEETING WITH MR NIGEL FARRAGE, MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party),BRUSSELS, EUROPE 24/6/08
From: FARAGE Nigel nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu Date: 24 jun. 2008 17:38 Subject: RE: "THE STRASBOURG DEMONSTRATION" at THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, July 7,8 + 2008 - WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY – REFERENCES & LINKS To: Monika Stoces mcmailteam@gmail.com
Dear Monika Stoces
Thank you for your mailing - and good luck with your demo at the Strasbourg-site! If you would like to send two people into the buildings, I shall gladly meet them at the entrance to the LOW-building, on Tuesday or Wednesday afternoon, and provide them with passes. I should be interested to have a chat.
Please call (0033) 3881 77855 or (0032) 473 622 454, when delegation is ready to enter.
Yours sincerely Andrew S. Reed (Office of Nigel Farage)
STRASBOURGMEETING - HOW DID IT GO? July 9, 2008
Dear All Despite the relatively small number of participants ( 19 ), all in all the Strasburg demo was quite a success. The majority of the victims present were from Germany: Germany: 9, Italy: 3, Switzerland: 2, Belgium: 2, France:1, Austria: 1 and Morocco: 1 As agreed, Swetlana and Walter Madliger had a chat with Andrew Reed of the Office of MP Nigel Farage. A detailed summary of the meeting will be posted later. French FR3 TV kept their promise to me and came on Monday 7th to interview us and to film the demo. This demo not only gave us an intense sense of pleasure and enjoyment of fighting together, but this in turn made us more than ready to indulge in that most human of activities - social interaction- the sharing of experiences and the simple but enduring pleasure of enjoying each other's company and conversation. Two news editors left messages on my answering machine to apologize for being held up at the last minute and wish to make up for it by inviting me for an interview next week. One might well think all this is a promising start. With all good wishes Rudy rudyrud2004@yahoo.fr
July 14, 2008 Here is the English version of Swetlana's and Walter's summary-report on their meeting with Andrew Reed of the Office of MEP Nigel Farage. An Italian version will be sent to Paolo's group, later on. Rudy
SUMMARY REPORT Summary report on the meeting with Mr Andrew Reed, assistant to Mr Nigel Farage, MEP, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party) on July 8th, 2008 in the Europarliament Low Building in Strasbourg, France, from 1.45 p.m to 3.10 p.m.
DEMOCRACY IN SEVERE CRISIS Our chat with Mr Andrew Reed could be summed up with the above title. Unfortunately, the delegation of the Strasbourg demonstration,Mrs Swetlana Schunin and myself,Walter Madliger could not speak to Mr Nigel Farage, MEP personally, but he came by for a short while, just to greet us. Mr Andrew Reed not only confirmed the title of this article, but he was also critical of the EU policy, whose relationship with the citizens is generally too impersonal. He explained the mechanisms of political power and their influences on democracy. He gave us an outline of the abuse of power which is easily possible in a democracy and is more and more widespread. This, of course, is very alarming.
The abuse of power is the essence of moral evil. Moral evil occurs, when the authorities refuse to accept the responsibility for the welfare of those who are logically under their care. When there is no close ties with the citizens, moral evil and tort are common practice. The abuse of power is the telltale sign of democracies in crisis. We are governed by a distant political elite,which has lost all contact with the people.
Nobody than we, the victims of mindcontrol and electronic harassment , could have agreed more.
While Mr Andrew Reed tried to make us understand his position and his problems, we tried to get a word in and present our own problems. He asked about the whys and wherefores of this control of the psyche, when it had occured and how it had impacted on us. We gave him a few examples and an update of psychophysical means and weapons, and of the existing laws on their misuse. He took down notes of all this.
In my opinion , he was very well aware of all these means and weapons, and even of the laws, but he did not show how much aware he was. He also seemed to let us understand he has very scarce knowledge of the HAARP issue and the EU-Resolution A4-0005/99, although the UK is one of the most important states, which have participated in the similar EISCAT installations in Norway. He made no comments on our allegations that England used mindcontrol technology in the Northern Ireland Conflict and on the island itself, e.g.in Greenham Commons in 1988.
We talked about the development and the proliferation of Non-lethal Weapons and the international symposia in Ettlingen, Germany. When we asked him about a possible specific reaction of the EU-Parliament to the problems under discussion, (e.g. in the form of a specific EU-resolution), he could not promise us that he would be able to organize and form a subcommittee for this purpose, nor even a subcommittee for the investigation of our allegations and complaints.
The assenting votes of quite a few delegates would be needed and the party's fraction in the EU-Parliament would be just a bit too small. Whether this statement was 100% true, I doubt a bit, as the overall number of the so-called “Eurosceptics” fraction amounts to 37 , to the best of my knowledge.
In other words, a specific EU-Resolution regarding mindcontrol means and electronic harassment weapons is not yet in sight. Apparently, there is some “understanding” of our complaints, but in the end nobody is willing to really do something about it.
The question we have to ask ourselves is what will everything be like, if we ask the politicians and the governments to forbid and stop the use of the weapons in question on human beings. They are, right now, lining their greedy pockets with a quick profit, they are, right now, making their dictatorial dreams come true . So who wants to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs?
At the end of the meeting, we handed out information material to Mr Andrew Reed ( books of Jim Keith and Mr Gehring and additional info-material, the Smirnov-DVD ). It remains to be seen whether or not Mr Reed will have a look at them. When we pointed out that the fate and the whole future of our children are at stake, Mr Reed agreed and was quite impressed.
Comment: At least, the European Parliament has now been informed by a first hand source. Now, they know that there exist citizens who want to fight for the issue and for their most fundamental Human Rights. This issue and that of getting the delegates to support our cause should now be our most important goal.
July 12, 2008 THE STRASBURG DEMONSTRATION Here's the English version of Swetlana's report written in German. More to come later. Rudy
THE DEMONSTRATION OF EUROPEAN VICTIMS IN THE FRENCH CITY OF STRASBURG ON JULY 7TH AND JULY 8TH, 2008
The demonstration of European victims took place under the motto "against human experiments with psychophysical weapons" in the French city of Strasburg in front of the European Parliament building on July 7th and at the Council of Europe on July 8th, 2008. One week before the demonstration, we sent information to several editorial staff and TV channels in Strasburg and in other cities of France and Europe. And they did come to the Europarliament on July 7th to support us! The aim of the demonstration was to call the attention of the parliamentarians and the population of Strasburg, to arouse their interest and to ask a press coverage of the issue. In addition, we demanded an extension of the European weapon law which forbids the illegal trading, the illegal possession and the illegal use of psychophysical weapons.
We demanded that an appropriate law put a stop to all kinds of abuse by criminal organisations, and by the military and Secret Services . The organizers of this demonstration in Strasburg were: Swetlana Schunin and Christina Marx from Germany, and Walter Madliger from Switzerland. We have provided flyers in English and German and made posters with the following slogans:
1. Governments are incapable of fighting electromagnetic terror! 2. You might become a victim! 3. Stop psycho-experiments on innocent human beings, immediately! 4. Abusive irradiation technologies on citizens! 5. Prohibition of the control of human subconsciousness! 6. We must put an end to a terrible genocide! 7. Secret services and state criminals are carrying out their experiments remotely! 8. Stop military-medical experiments on peaceful citizens! 9. Brutal tortures and secret murders of innocent people in many countries! 10. Dr. V. Agischev is the criminal head of the "Skvortsova-Stepanova" psychiatric hospital in St. Petersburg!
We called hundreds of European and German victims and emailed lots of invitations. Many victims could not join us for health and financial reasons. But they all sent us short messages saying their thoughts were with us. So, a relatively small number of victims turned up at the demonstration. We all met at 9.30 a.m on Monday, July 7th in front of the Europarliament. 22 victims altogether turned up from all Europe: 10 from Germany, 3 from Italy, 2 from Russia, 2 from Belgium, 2 from Switzerland, 1 from Austria, 1 from France and 1 from Spain/Morocco. Two supporters from Strasburg joined in with the group later. All demonstrators spared neither time nor efforts throughout the 2-day demonstration. We managed to hand out 800 info sheets to the passers-by, to the parliamentarians and to the tourists in front of the Europarliament and the Council of Europe buildings. Many citizens did show an interest in our problem and some others already knew about this crime.
On Monday 7th, about 11 a.m, two reporters of French TV Channel FR3 came to support us and to make an interview . Some activists told them about this worldwide crime.The press took great interest in our situation. We, therefore, hope that they will give accurate coverage of the whole event. We were particularly impressed at seeing Italian and Moroccan activists Paola Sbronzeri, Paolo Dorigo and Fouzia stopping the cars on the street and handing out flyers to the drivers. Throughout the two-day demonstration our posters helped the passers-by and prospective supporters to understand the whys and wherefores of our action. Although the Secret Services and the French CRS police armed to the teeth controlled our demonstration from start to finish, everything went off quite smoothly. On the second day, from 10 o'clock onwards we once again informed the tourists, drivers and passers-by at the Council of Europe building. Our posters had a very big effect on the passers-by. In the afternoon, as agreed, Swetlana Schunin and Walter Madliger had a one-hour audience with Andrew Reed of the office of MEP Nigel Paul Farage. We think that this meeting is a promising start for all of us. The central issue is that we were able to call the attention and to arouse the interest of the parliamentarians, the press, the Strasburgers and the foreign tourists with only 24 demonstrators.
The work we did all together throughout the two-day event inspired us and other victims to organise even bigger demonstrations in the future. This European demonstration in Strasburg has shown that we can defeat these brutal barbarians only by joining all our forces. We all think it was a big success. And we had the pleasure of sharing our experiences and of enjoying each other's company in a friendly atmosphere. We will carry on with our common action to save everyone of us from these sadists' cruel tortures, we will keep on fighting so that every man and every child on the planet can live and sleep quietly without tortures and psychological terror!
The organizer of the Strasburg demonstration and president of the "Association Against the Abuse of Psychophysical Weapons" Swetlana Schunin
15. RECAP OF MY/OUR ACTIVISM SINCE JANUARY 2008 from RUDY - rudyrud2004@gmail.com.fr 3/7/08
1. A few contacted authorities did not follow through into further help other than the initial promise of support . 2. Many of them fizzled out . 3. Some "people" got to them to block their continued help or... 4. Some decided they do not wish to get further involved .
We had loads of potential help. For various reasons many of them backed out.
So here is the situation:- a) We had to deal with lots of "pies-in-the- sky", "lip-service- experts", "just-hot-air" and "just-for- show" people. b) Lots of them were just "deaf-ears". c) Many backed out for more or less mysterious reasons d) Some were " experts in arrogance " e) Some did try to do their best f) Some confessed they couldn't do much
VIII. THOSE WHO ARE STILL HELPING US Spanish Journalist Rafael Palacio Rowena Thursby of UK KIG
IX. And now, the GOOD news 1.Six European journalists have agreed to have a meeting with me in Paris, early September 2008. The date is still to be arranged. 2. All the news editors who came to the Strasburg demo in July 2008 agree to follow through into further help.
16. THE RIGHT REVEREND JOHN NOBLE VICAR GENERAL DIOCESE OF MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA 14/7/08
14/7/08 Dear Mr Finch The Archbishop of Melbourne is currently overseas and will be away for some weeks ahead. In his absence I am responding to your letter of the 7th July. I note the concerns your letter raises and have read the attachments you provided. Your immediate request was for access to a safe house, as a place of protection from the the things you have been experiencing. Unfortunately we do not have the resources to address the general issues you raise, nor are we able to provide you with acess to the type of accomodation you require. I trust you may be able to find the help you need through some other line of enquiry.
Grace & peace in Christ Jesus Yours sincerely The The Right Reverend John Noble, Vicar General Diocese Of Melbourne,
17. MR NIGEL FARRAGE, MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party),BRUSSELS, EUROPE 28/7/08
Subject: UKIP-response to FAMCE-delegation Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:27:12 +0200 From: nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu To: mcmailteam@gmail.com, rudyrud2004@gmail.com
Dear Monika and Rudy
Three weeks ago, as you know, a FAMCE-delegation, consisting of Swetlana Schunin and Walter Madliger, was received at the UKIP-offices in the LOW-building of the EU's consultative assembly, at Strasbourg, and submitted certain documents, with a view to promoting awareness of the need to monitor and control a range of electronic weapons, which, according to numerous reports, have been under development for several decades and have been used, covertly, in various parts of the world, to the discomfort and distress of many people.
Most notable, among the documents submitted - because it comes, as it were, from the horse's mouth - is the programme of the "4th European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons 2007", held by the "European Working Group on Non-Lethal Weapons" (EWG-NLW) http://www.non-lethal-weapons.com/leaflet.pdf at the Stadthalle, in Ettlingen, Germany.
This programme, containing as it does, such items as "Software and Hardware of Instrumentation for Human-State Control in the Influence-Field of Microwave Radiation", "Psychological Effects of Non-Lethal Weapons: a new Approach for Defining more Effective Uses" and "Bio-Impulse: a Research Program to Study the Effects of Nanosecond Electromagnetic Pulses on Biological Cells", bears out the studies and anecdotal evidence, submitted by the delegation, to the extent that research into electronic weapons, for the purposes of effecting pain, injury and mind-manipulation, is certainly going on.
Furthermore, judging by the sources of the presentations made at the symposium, most of this research is proceeding in the EU, the USA and Russia. Note too that, at this same symposium (on 23rd May, item V27) the International Committee of the Red Cross sponsored a presentation on the subject of "Ensuring the protection of Civilians and Respect for International Humanitarian Law".
The delegation did not mention that the EWG-NLW is now preparing for its "5th European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons 2009" - also to be held at the Stadthalle in Ettlingen - and is appealing for prospective presenters, either of discussions (25 mins) or of posters, to send in their abstracts before the 1st October. http://www.ict.fraunhofer.de/fhg/Images/Callforpapers5EuropeanSymposiumNon-LethalWeapons_tcm137-124391.pdf
If FAMCE has not done so, I would recommend that it submit an abstract for this symposium - as the Red Cross successfully did, last year - in order to promote awareness of the themes of its campaign among those who know most about the technology, which FAMCE alleges is being mis-used. EWG-NLG's response to such an application might be informative; and, even if the application is unsuccessful, FAMCE should attempt, at least, to attend the symposium in order to gather intelligence.
EWG-NLW's website (URL given above) states that "The working Group is open to all European organizations working in the area of Non-Lethal Weapons", so, unless the membership-fee is prohibitively high, I do not see why FAMCE should not join the working-group as a full member, get closer to the sources (which remain tantalisingly vague) of the problems it identifies, and develop a voice within a forum, which will be able to appreciate, better than any other, the significance of what it is saying.
As for the wider political context, in which electronic weapons are being developed, I would have thought it quite clear that the real danger to democracy, the rule of law and the rights of the individual, comes, not from the weapons themselves (knives and clubs can be used just as secretly and unattributably as electronic weapons) but from the erosion of democracy by supranational organisations, such as the EU, and clandestine, politico-commercial influences, such as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House)
I agree completely with the opening chapters of Jim Keith's "Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness", which the delegation gave me, and which describes the grip exerted on US-policy by surreptitious societies, large corporations and secret agencies, and the sinister data-gathering programmes of the (not yet quite sovereign) EU. The restoration of democracy, under these circumstances, is the only possible answer to misconduct by these various, sinister entities. Even passing laws, like the ones now "in force", against the mis-use of electronic weapons, in some US-states, is completely ineffective as long as governments and courts remain under the undue influence of special interests, whether commercial or supranational.
Persuasive too is Heiner Gehring's book "Versklavte Gehirne", which the delegation also gave me, and which charts the control and misuse of the mass-media by the governments and other entities described above, showing that the restoration of democracy - through the decision of informed electorates - can only be achieved if the dis-information, propagated by an oligarchy of media-chains, can somehow be countered.
This is the essential business of the UK Independence Party (UKIP) and its supporters, among whom, therefore, I should like to count the FAMCE.
Even so, it may be possible to influence the situation for the better, by exposing the abuse of electronic weapons, if attacks of this kind can be clearly documented and liability can be clearly established. The confused anecdotes of people, who claim to have been rendered mentally ill by such attacks, are, by their very nature, ambiguous and unreliable, and must be supported by some kind of concrete evidence. When such evidence does emerge, UKIP's representatives in the Houses of Parliament in London (rather than those in the EU's sham counterpart in Brussels) will be well-placed to present it, and I shall certainly assist them in doing so.
Meanwhile, if you have specific questions, which our Westminster-representatives can usefully put to government-ministers, I would be pleased to relay these to them; but action in the EU's institutions is virtually impossible. Written questions to the EU-Commission receive bland replies after several weeks. An independent Political Group, such as ours, is effectively prevented from tabling items for the plenary agenda, and "MEP's", who are not supporters of the régime, are treated, in general, with contempt and are ignored. All of this helps to demonstrate the EU's inherently anti-democratic structure, which should not be appealed to, under any circumstances, because doing so would imply recognition of a legitimacy it does not possess.
For us, the EU-assembly provides a platform for publicity in Britain, and nothing more. It does not influence the EU's essential powers (as the fate of the Resolution of 1999, against the mis-use of electronic weapons, demonstrates) but, on all matters of moment, merely echoes the EU-Commission. As a platform, however - and lacking any other, as we did until three years ago, when we first obtained representation at Westminster - it has been invaluable to us, and will probably continue to be so, for some time.
Now that we have made contact, and begun to work together, therefore, I look forward to maintaining a fruitful association with FAMCE.
Yours sincerely Andrew S. Reed Office of Nigel Farage, Brussels MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (UKIP)
Posted by JOHN FINCH on February 3, 2015 at 8:04am
Dear Torture Victims & Friends
Below is a list of references and links about electronic torture, abuse and experimentation, and organised stalking.
Below that is a list of victims’ organisations and further information.
Please have a look at these terrible technologies and crimes.
As long ago as 1994 in Montreux, Switzerland the International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC raised the issue of Psychotronic or Directed-Energy weapons, also at the Geneva Forum in 2002, and also in 2009 at the 5th European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons and at the European Conference.
In January 1999, the European Parliament passed a resolution where it calls “ for an international convention introducing a global ban on all development and deployment of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings. It is our conviction that this ban can not be implemented without the global pressure of the informed general public on the governments. Our major objective is to get across to the general public the real threat which these weapons represent for human rights and democracy and to apply pressure on the governments and parliaments around the world to enact legislature which would prohibit the use of these devices to both government and private organisations as well as individuals.” (Plenary sessions/Europarliament, 1999)
In October 2001, Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich introduced a bill to the House of Representatives which, it was hoped would be extremely important in the fight to expose and stop psycho-electronic mind control experimentation on involuntary, non-consensual citizens. The Bill was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services and International Relations. In the original bill a ban was sought on ‘exotic weapons’ including electronic, psychotronic or information weapons, chemtrails, particle beams, plasmas, electromagnetic radiation, extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation, or mind control technologies. Despite the inclusion of a prohibition of the basing of weapons in space, and the use of weapons to destroy objects or damage objects in space, there is no mention in the revised bill of any of the aforementioned mind-invasive weaponry, nor of the use of satellite or radar or other energy based technology for deploying or developing technology designed for deployment against the minds of human beings. (Space Preservation Act, 2002)
Please be assured that for years these weapons have been used to terribly torture and abuse victims all over the world.
Please have a look at these terrible technologies and crimes.
TARGETED INDIVIDUAL and a member of THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION ABOUT ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION:-
“October 10, 2007 Dear Member of the Legislature and Friends:
This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violations and physical injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use of Verichip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans. . . . . .”
The British army is creating a special force of Facebook warriors, skilled in psychological operations and use of social media to engage in unconventional warfare in the information age.
The 77th Brigade, to be based in Hermitage, near Newbury, in Berkshire, will be about 1,500-strong and formed of units drawn from across the army. It will formally come into being in April.
The brigade will be responsible for what is described as non-lethal warfare. Both the Israeli and US army already engage heavily in psychological operations.
Against a background of 24-hour news, smartphones and social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, the force will attempt to control the narrative.
The 77th will include regulars and reservists and recruitment will begin in the spring. Soldiers with journalism skills and familiarity with social media are among those being sought.
An army spokesman said: “77th Brigade is being created to draw together a host of existing and developing capabilities essential to meet the challenges of modern conflict and warfare. It recognises that the actions of others in a modern battlefield can be affected in ways that are not necessarily violent.”
The move is partly a result of experience in counter-insurgency operations in Afghanistan. It can also be seen as a response to events of the last year that include Russia’s actions in Ukraine, in particular Crimea, and Islamic State’s (Isis) takeover of large swaths of Syria and Iraq.
Nato has so far been unable to find a counter to what the US and UK claim is Russia creating unrest by sending in regular troops disguised as local militia, allowing president Vladimir Putin to deny responsibility.Isis has proved adept at exploiting social media to attract fighters from around the world.
The Israel Defence Forces have pioneered state military engagement with social media, with dedicated teams operating since Operation Cast Lead, its war in Gaza in 2008-9. The IDF is active on 30 platforms – including Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and Instagram – in six languages. “It enables us to engage with an audience we otherwise wouldn’t reach,” said an Israeli army spokesman.
It has been approached by several western countries, keen to learn from its expertise.
During last summer’s war in Gaza, Operation Protective Edge, the IDF and Hamas’s military wing, the Qassam Brigades, tweeted prolifically, sometimes engaging directly with one another.
The new brigade is being named the 77th in tribute to the Chindits, the British guerrilla force led by Maj Gen Orde Wingate against the Japanese in Burma during the second world war. Wingate adopted unorthodox and controversial tactics that achieved successes completely disproportionate to the size of his forces, sending teams deep into Japanese-held territory, creating uncertainty in the Japanese high command and forcing it to alter its strategic plans.
In a nod to the Chindits, members of the 77th Brigade will have arm badges showing a mythical Burmese creature.
The aim is that the new force will prove as flexible as the Chindits in the face of the dizzying array of challenges being thrown up in the early part of this century.
The creation of 77th Brigade comes as the commander of Nato special operations headquarters, Lt Gen Marshall Webb, speaking in Washington this week, expressed concern about Russia and about Isis.
“Special operations headquarters is uniquely placed to address this,” he said. “We tend to take an indirect approach. We can engage without being escalatory or aggressive. We tend to view things from an oblique angle, and we absolutely acknowledge that trust, information-sharing and interagency collaboration is crucial.”
(NaturalNews) It's time to recognize a simple, yet alarming truth. We are all living in a sea of microwave radiation - generated by microwave ovens, cell phones and Wi-Fi 'hot spots'. This exposure represents one of the greatest threats to human health, and the telecommunication industry does NOT want you to know the truth about electromagnetic frequencies. (EMFs)
The stakes are very high. We are seeing an epidemic rise in the rates of autism, chronic fatigue and stress-related diseases like cancer. On the next NaturalNews Talk Hour, Jonathan Landsman and David Carpenter, M.D., an environmental health expert, talk about what you need to know to protect yourself from EMFs.
Why should we care about wireless microwave radiation?
For starters, let's not forget, we (humans) are bioelectrical beings. Our hearts and brains depend on internal bioelectrical signals to function properly. And, whether we like it or not, hundreds of scientific studies now prove that microwave radiation - that comes from cell phones, baby monitors plus other wireless mobile devices - significantly disturb cellular functions.
In just the last decade or so, the United States has seen cell phone towers expand from just 36,000 to over 260,000 - with no end in sight. These towers are being placed near schools and healthcare facilities - placing our children (and the elderly) at even greater risk of sickness and premature death. It's no wonder why we see the direct correlation between the use of microwave radiation technologies and the growth of autism, Alzheimer's disease, and a variety of other autoimmune conditions.
To be blunt, there is a biochemical reason why so many people are suffering with irregular heartbeats, sleep disorders, memory problems, increased anxiety levels and brain fog. In addition, we are seeing a dramatic increase in reproductive problems, brain cancer and learning disabilities in children. On the next NaturalNews Talk Hour, Jonathan Landsman and Dr. Carpenter will talk about how to stop this madness.
Cell phone manufacturers would have you believe that the 'low level' microwave radiation produced by your cell phone is 'perfectly safe'. But, Dr. Barrie Trower, a retired British military intelligence scientist, has a very different opinion.
According to Dr. Trower, during the Cold War of the 1950s and 1960s, low-level microwave radiation was used as a stealth weapon - by the Russians - toward the American embassy, giving embassy employees (and their family members) breast cancer and leukemia. In addition, microwaves were the perfect stealth weapon to be used on dissident groups around the world - because it changed their mental outlook on life and gave them cancer, without them even knowing it.
Experts warn about the dangers of cell phone technology:
"The greatest polluting element in the earth's environment is the proliferation of electromagnetic fields. I consider that to be a far greater threat on a global scale than warming, or the increase of chemical elements in the environment." - Dr. Robert O. Becker, M.D., author of "The Body Electric"
"People exposed to cell tower signals experience dizziness, nervousness, chest pain, shortness of breath, numbness and tingling, weakness, and difficulty concentrating." - Dutch Government report
"Humans who live within 4 km of a broadcast antenna experience behavioral disorders, cognitive dysfunction, and adverse health effects including leukemia, diabetes, and psychoses." - Magda Havas, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Environmental & Resource Studies at Trent University
"The extrapolated trend indicates that 50% of the population can be expected to become electro-sensitive by the year 2017." - Dr. Olle Johannson, neuroscientist
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IRIC), part of the United Nations' World Health Organization (WHO), classifies lead, chloroform, gasoline fumes, DDT and radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF/EMF) as 'Class 2B Possible Human Carcinogens'. Don't ignore the growing threat of EMF pollution - join us for an informative program about how to protect your health.
This week's guest: David Carpenter, M.D., an environmental health expert
Learn about the dangers of wireless technology - before it's too late - Sun. Feb. 1
David O. Carpenter is a public health physician whose current position is Director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany, as well as Professor of Environmental Health Sciences within the School of Public Health at the University at Albany. After receiving his MD degree from Harvard Medical School, he chose a career of research and public health.
Dr. Carpenter's research initially was basic neurobiology and more recently has primarily been the study of human disease resulting from exposure to environmental contaminants. He has focused on the relationship between exposures to a variety of chemicals and ionizing radiation and incidence of several human diseases, including diabetes, hypertension, heart disease and diseases of the nervous system. With more than 350 peer-reviewed publications and editor of five books, Dr. Carpenter is the leading expert on electromagnetic frequencies and its effects on human health.
The world is waking up to the dangers of wireless technology. In 2014, an international group of doctors and scientific experts urged pregnant women to limit their exposure to wireless radiation from cell phones and other devices. We're all being affected by this technology. Learn how to protect yourself from harm by tuning into the next NaturalNews Talk Hour with Jonathan Landsman.
What this doctor is claiming is that a medication known as nano silver can cure most diseases that it has been tested on. I do not know if it will be effective against Morgellons disease but I would think it would be worth a shot.
The natural solutions foundation has an online shop where nano silver can be purchased.
Dr. Rima Laibow in the above video has been exposing the new world order eugenics program for worldwide "culling" of the population for years so I take her word for it, she has the credentials and is one of those rare medical professionals who understands the true scope of what is going on in the world.
I believe that Morgellons is a man made disease much like Ebola and Aids. I am not saying that this is the cure, Morgellons may in fact be designed to resist Nano silver treatment, But I do believe it is worth a shot.
What is resilience? How adversity builds character
It has often been said that adversity builds character. How does this work?Research on resilience suggests a metaphor: Comparing the building of resilience with the building of strength through physical exercise.
Two quotes from Eleanor Roosevelt capture this:
Do one thing everyday that scares you.
and
I believe that anyone can conquer fear by doing the things he fears to do, provided he keeps doing them until he gets a record of successful experiences behind him.
You cannot get stronger without exercising (say, for instance, lifting weights). For the training to be significant, you have to go beyond your comfort zone.
However, there is an important note of caution: If you lift weights that are way too heavy for you, you get injured. Then, not only do you not get stronger, you’re not even able to exercise any more, until the injury is healed.
The practical implications are very clear:
- You need to be challenged in order to grow. As you successfully overcome challenges, you build resilience, i.e. the ability to successfully face other challenges.
- But, if the challenges are overwhelming, i.e. too far beyond your capacity to handle adversity, you get traumatized. I use the word “traumatized” to describe a situation that is similar to the physical injury that comes from exercising way beyond your abilities: This reduces your capacity to function effectively, let alone face adversity. You can’t make significant progress until this is healed.
The following is excerpted from an article in The New York Times' Science section, January 5, 2011: On Road to Recovery, Past Adversity Provides a Map, by Benedict Carey
Research suggests that resilience may have at least as much to do with how often people have faced adversity in past as it does with who they are — their personality, their genes, for example — or what they’re facing now. That is, the number of life blows a person has taken may affect his or her mental toughness more than any other factor.
“Frequency makes a difference: that is the message,” said Roxane Cohen Silver, a psychologist at the University of California, Irvine. “Each negative event a person faces leads to an attempt to cope, which forces people to learn about their own capabilities, about their support networks — to learn who their real friends are. That kind of learning, we think, is extremely valuable for subsequent coping,” up to a point.
In a study appearing in The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Dr. Cohen Silver, E. Alison Holman, also of the University of California, Irvine, and Mark D. Seery, of the State University at Buffalo, followed nearly 2,000 adults for several years, monitoring their mental well-being with online surveys. The participants, a diverse cross section of Americans between the ages of 18 and 101, listed all of the upsetting life events they had experienced before entering the study and any new ones that hit along the way. These included divorce, the death of a friend or parent, a serious illness, and being in a natural disaster.
Or, none of the above: A subset of the participants, 194, reported that they had experienced not one of the fairly comprehensive list of 37 events on the survey. “We wondered: Who are these people who have managed to go through life with nothing bad happening to them?” Dr. Cohen Silver said. “Are they hyper-conscientious? Socially isolated? Just young? Or otherwise unique?”
They weren’t, the researchers found. Stranger still, they were not the most satisfied with their lives. Their sense of well-being was about the same, on average, as people who had suffered up to a dozen memorable blows.
It was those in the middle, those reporting two to six stressful events, who scored highest on several measures of well-being, and who showed the most resilience in response to recent hits.
In short, the findings suggest that mental toughness is something like the physical strength: It cannot develop without exercise, and it breaks down when overworked. Some people in the study reported having had more than a dozen stressful events, and it showed.
“These people were truly suffering,” Dr. Cohen Silver said, “and we do not minimize in any way the pain of such events when you’re going through them. But it does appear that if you’ve had several such experiences but not too many, you learn something.”
#Disney presents the inspiring true story of one little girl whose strength and dignity during the racially charged 1960s helped change history!
When bright six-year-old Ruby is chosen to be the first African-American to integrate her local New Orleans elementary school, she is subjected to the true ugliness of racism for the very first time.
But guided by the love of her mother and father, Ruby's heroic struggle for a better education becomes a lesson for us all!
http://youtu.be/hT6s1s4jWdoAn acclaimed and entertaining motion picture also starring Penelope Ann Miller and Kevin Pollak -- you'll want to share this remarkable story of courage and pride with your family!
"And one more warning, never get too drunk, drink, but a glass or two of red wine per day but never too much, I know it might be hard to play with words, but you might get in a coma and they will play you big time, If you thought before was hell you never ever want to find this one. If might even be the end if you're not lucky."
Posted by JOHN FINCH on January 28, 2015 at 7:37am
Dear Torture Victims & Friends
Here is some real evidence of these tortures and crimes. PUBLIC COMMENT VIDEOS - THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION FOR THE STUDY OF BIOETHICAL ISSUES
May 2011 Bioethics Commission hearing Public comment session videos.
Targeted Individuals give their testimonies before the Presidential Commission about their involvement as involuntary mind control, weapons research, and no-touch torture victims.
THEPRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION FOR THE STUDY OF BIOETHICAL ISSUES
1425 New York Avenue, NW, Suite C-100, Washington, DC 20005 PHONE 202-233-3960 FAX 202-233-3990 http://www.bioethics.gov/
July 27, 2011
Dear Commenter:
We are writing to advise you on our ongoing work and plans for the next meeting of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. We appreciate the time that you have taken to engage with us.
We would like to clarify for your information that the Commission is not investigating or reviewing any concerns or complaints concerning claims about targeted individuals. This includes claims concerning: MK-ULTRA; COINTELPRO; electromagnetic torture or attacks; organized stalking; remove influencing; microwave harassment; covert harassment and surveillance; human tracking; psychotronic or psychotropic weapons and radio frequency or military weapons or other claims.
As such the Commission will not hear further testimony on these subjects. Many of these issues have been investigated in the past. The Commission is not a law enforcement, regulatory or legislative body. It does not control any federal monies. In addition, the Commission has no involvement with the public or private grants and has no power to open or undertake criminal cases.
As advisors to the President, we will ensure that all of your concerns, information and testimony are provided to the White House. We sincerely appreciate your interest in the work of the Commission and the time you have taken to share your personal history with us.
Sincerely signature
Valerie H. Bonham Executive Director
Contact the Commission
General Inquiries
1425 New York Avenue, NW Suite C-100 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 233-3960, phone (202) 233-3990, fax info@bioethics.gov
and contact the The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) - Office for Human Research Protections 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 200 Rockville, MD 20852
Toll-Free Telephone within the United States: (866) 447-4777 Telephone: (240) 453-6900 Fax: (240) 453-6909 E-mail: OHRP@hhs.gov, Kristina.Borror@hhs.gov, Kristina C. Borror, Ph.D. Director, Division of Compliance Oversight