Blogs

All Posts (12216)

Sort by

Bush to The Hague- International Criminal Court complaint filed against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Tenet, Rice and Gonzales

Posted by ron on February 7, 2010 at 5:28am
http://www.redress.cc/global/redress20100206Bush to The Hague International Criminal Court complaint filed against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Tenet, Rice and Gonzales Request for international arrest warrants 6 February 2010 A leading US professor of law has filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court prosecutor against former US President George W. Bush and a number of his senior lieutenants alleging crimes against humanity for their policy and practice of “extraordinary rendition” and requesting that the ICC prosecutor obtain international arrest warrants against Mr Bush and his co-accused. Professor Francis A. Boyle of the University of Illinois College of Law in Champaign, USA, has filed a complaint with the prosecutor for the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague against US citizens George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, George Tenet, Condoleezza Rice and Alberto Gonzales (the “Accused”) for their criminal policy and practice of “extraordinary rendition” perpetrated upon about 100 human beings. “Extraordinary rendition” is a euphemism for the enforced disappearance of persons and their consequent torture. This criminal policy and practice by the Accused constitutes crimes against humanity in violation of the Rome Statute establishing the ICC. The United States is not a party to the Rome Statute. Nevertheless, the Accused have ordered and been responsible for the commission of actions considered as crimes under the ICC statute within the respective territories of many ICC member states, including several in Europe. Consequently, the ICC has jurisdiction to prosecute the Accused for their ICC statutory crimes under Rome Statute Article 12(2)(a) that affords the ICC jurisdiction to prosecute for ICC statutory crimes committed in ICC member states. The complaint requests: 1. That the ICC prosecutor open an investigation of the Accused on his own accord under Rome Statute article 15(1); and 2. That the ICC Prosecutor also formally “submit to the [ICC] Pre-Trial Chamber a request for authorization of an investigation” of the Accused under Rome Statute Article 15(3). For similar reasons, the highest level officials of the Obama administration risk the filing of a follow-up complaint with the ICC if they do not immediately terminate the Accused’s criminal policy and practice of “extraordinary rendition, which the Obama administration has continued to implement. The complaint concludes with a request that the ICC prosecutor obtain international arrest warrants for the Accused from the ICC in accordance with Rome Statute articles 58(1)(a), 58(1)(b)(i), 58(1)(b)(ii), and 58(1)(b)(iii). Please contacting the ICC prosecutor by letter, fax or email – contact details below – to demonstrate your support for this complaint. The Honourable Luis Moreno-Ocampo Office of the Prosecutor International Criminal Court Post Office Box 19519 2500 CM, The Hague The Netherlands Fax No.: 31-70-515-8555 Email: OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.intBush to The Hague International Criminal Court complaint filed against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Tenet, Rice and GonzalesRequest for international arrest warrants6 February 2010A leading US professor of law has filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court prosecutor against former US President George W. Bush and a number of his senior lieutenants alleging crimes against humanity for their policy and practice of “extraordinary rendition” and requesting that the ICC prosecutor obtain international arrest warrants against Mr Bush and his co-accused.Professor Francis A. Boyle of the University of Illinois College of Law in Champaign, USA, has filed a complaint with the prosecutor for the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague against US citizens George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, George Tenet, Condoleezza Rice and Alberto Gonzales (the “Accused”) for their criminal policy and practice of “extraordinary rendition” perpetrated upon about 100 human beings.“Extraordinary rendition” is a euphemism for the enforced disappearance of persons and their consequent torture. This criminal policy and practice by the Accused constitutes crimes against humanity in violation of the Rome Statute establishing the ICC.The United States is not a party to the Rome Statute. Nevertheless, the Accused have ordered and been responsible for the commission of actions considered as crimes under the ICC statute within the respective territories of many ICC member states, including several in Europe. Consequently, the ICC has jurisdiction to prosecute the Accused for their ICC statutory crimes under Rome Statute Article 12(2)(a) that affords the ICC jurisdiction to prosecute for ICC statutory crimes committed in ICC member states.The complaint requests:1. That the ICC prosecutor open an investigation of the Accused on his own accord under Rome Statute article 15(1); and2. That the ICC Prosecutor also formally “submit to the [ICC] Pre-Trial Chamber a request for authorization of an investigation” of the Accused under Rome Statute Article 15(3).For similar reasons, the highest level officials of the Obama administration risk the filing of a follow-up complaint with the ICC if they do not immediately terminate the Accused’s criminal policy and practice of “extraordinary rendition, which the Obama administration has continued to implement.The complaint concludes with a request that the ICC prosecutor obtain international arrest warrants for the Accused from the ICC in accordance with Rome Statute articles 58(1)(a), 58(1)(b)(i), 58(1)(b)(ii), and 58(1)(b)(iii).Please contacting the ICC prosecutor by letter, fax or email – contact details below – to demonstrate your support for this complaint.The Honourable Luis Moreno-OcampoOffice of the ProsecutorInternational Criminal CourtPost Office Box 195192500 CM, The HagueThe NetherlandsFax No.: 31-70-515-8555Email: OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int5 Page Document By Prof Boyle- An INTERNATIONAL LAWYER BushToHague,pdf.pdf, 1.3 MB
Read more…

Blue Ribbon Meats made an Unrequested soliciation

Posted by ron on February 4, 2010 at 6:37am
Blue Ribbon Meats made an Unrequested soliciation and then when I told them there was no tresspassing they Lied and said that they did not tresspass and that I cannot video tape them on private property. They were first at a perps house by the name of Mike Edmundson and they had a delivery of meat he did not pick up and they were going to sell it to us for a good deal. Mike Edmundson lives on Sleepy Hollow drive Fort Myers Shores Florida zip 33905. Mike Edmundson is a bail bondsman and a massive perpThere is no soliciting in the area and it violates lawhttp://mcvictimsworld.ning.com/forum/attachment/download?id=2301601%3AUploadedFi38%3A28500download?id=2301601%3AUploadedFi38%3A28501download?id=2301601%3AUploadedFi38%3A28502
Read more…

中国政府屏蔽了在中国的对peacepink 的浏览

Posted by CONNIE on February 3, 2010 at 7:30pm
中国政府屏蔽了在中国的对peacepink 的浏览，中国这些伤天害理的人还怕粉红和平，他们害怕和平，害怕曝光。为什么中国电信等很多的组织都听他们的话，他们至少和中国政府关系密切，或者其成员就是政府中某些人。真是暗无天日的政府。我在为别人活着，害怕太多的人一直为我担心，我只好学习微笑，即便找不到理由。[Posted by 222.64.99.185 via http://algart.net/ww This is added while posting a message to avoid misuse.Try: http://webwarper.net/webwarper.exe Example of viewing: http://webwarper.net/ww/~av/lycos.com ]
Read more…

Miss Kitty

Posted by Karen Dawe on February 2, 2010 at 1:05pm
Miss Kitty:Thank you for your children message. The place I live in is a detrimental hazard. It doesn't like children or their moms or grand moms. It hates the world. I am glad you reminded me of this and my soul can be at peace amd this as applies to me as I am a single grand mom. I know the heartache of this house and some days it makes me feel poetic. I will look for you in the future and now and I will remember your mind, your true thoughts are the more for me.SincerelyKaren Dawe
Read more…

Tell me if this is what you hear

Posted by SheriGrutz on January 31, 2010 at 2:03am
This was taken from a medical journal pertaining to voices that schizophrenics hear:Many times the voices simply comment on what the individual is doing at the time. If the individual is speaking with a supervisor, a voice may comment on what the supervisor is saying, or even be quite nasty about him/her. Sometimes the voices will actually give instructions to the individual, but they usually aren’t psychotic as portrayed in movies and books. Sometimes they will “take care” of the individual, instructing him or her to take a shower or eat a meal. It can be any number of things.What do these voices sound like? Well, there are many different ways for them to appear. Sometimes they will sound like an echo in the back of the mind. Many people experience them as thoughts that are sudden and unexpected, which are out of context and not something they would normally think. Most times people wouldn’t even recognize this as a voice if they didn’t believe in it. Sometimes voices will come from outside the head, and then they will usually be unintelligible. On occasion, they will appear as block print inside the head. However they appear to one individual, they will usually appear the same way all the time.Some of these individuals are capable of having a conversation with these voices. Some voices may even have names if they speak to the person often. On occasion they may even have personalities. However, people who claim most of this are labeled as insane, as getting into voices this deeply is not part of most cultures. It is a much disputed fact over whether these voices actually exist. The argument could go back and forth forever. However, it usually ends with simple insanity as the explanation.
Read more…

Response to the president

Posted by SheriGrutz on January 29, 2010 at 2:11am
Dear Mr. President:In last night’s State of The Union address, you said that too many of our citizens have lost faith in our biggest institutions, one of them being the government. You also said that we (meaning the United States) do not torture. This is the very reason why many of us have no faith in government, because it doesn’t tell the whole truth. If you want people to believe you, they better not find out about me. About me? You are not addressing someone like me, because I am not a citizen.A citizen of the United States of America doesn’t have her life on display for the media, the radio stations, magazines, Hollywood, other institutions that tap into and watch her life unfolding, possibly the thoughts in her head, the overnight dreams in her head. No, a citizen doesn’t have this satellite surveillance over her phone line, her computer, tracing and tracking everything she does and everywhere she goes.A citizen of the United States of America doesn’t experience deep sensations of direct energy to the head that smells like a type of gas, a type of chemical accompanied by crippling and deadly electronic pain that grinds down the center nervous system, the suffering of going through this nearly daily for over 6 years, a constant bombardment of weapons that no one around can feel, just center to the head of a target.A citizen doesn’t get turned away by every government official when trying to get help, the police, the district attorney, the governor, the senators, the representatives, countless other agencies and offices that turn a deaf ear, a blind eye, as if they are the disabled ones, as if they can not do a thing, as if I should somehow find a way to free myself.And finally, a citizen doesn’t never know the truth about her life is being used and abused, living on speculation and wonder, living on dropped clues, and thankfully, the internet articles that explain what is being done to the human beings across this world. There is an automatic right to know what is happening to her, a right that gives ownership to her own life, and that has been denied for 16 years.Yes, I watched The State of Union address last night, but you weren’t speaking to me because I’ve never been treated as a citizen, so I don’t know what its like. When you are ready to define what it means to be a citizen, then maybe I’ll start taking your words to heart. When you are ready to start an investigation into the crimes against humanity that plague this world over targeting and torture, then maybe I’ll be one that can either agree or disagree with you.Sincerely,Sheri M Grutz
Read more…

Diary Entry for Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Another day in the life of: 10AM loud metallic tingling has begun for today with one major change being that they rewired my head last night while I slept

Posted by Lynn Clarise Bahrenburg on January 28, 2010 at 11:04am
Diary Entry for Wednesday, January 27, 2010Another day in the life of:10AM loud metallic tingling has begun for today with one major change being that they rewired my head last night while I slept which explains why I was left alone for the 1st time since I can't even remember when- was awakened only twice in the night and each time the back side of my skull hurt and was being worked over... the same area being tweaked before going to sleep and again early this a.m. - their silence was a dead giveaway and immediately suspect as I have not had more than an hour's sleep for many many months on end. Typically, I am bothered all night long with constant trips to the bathroom w/forced urination – one night I counted (6) trips to the toilet until there was nothing left to squeeze out of me. My body is either heated or reverse cooled the entire night every night. This past Saturday night when Derrick's conference Call ended they put their “illumination” pen to point of influence at the display screen, and I could feel them moving it around in my stomach going up into my esophagus and then pharynx with the creation of battery acid from hell. This was repeated for two straight hours along with projectile vomiting – I seldom sleep and for me to still be on my feet is not possible UNLESS strengthening agents of some sort are being delivered my way – it's the only explanation coupled with something else that is happening to me which I'll go into at a future date although soon, because it has to do with the 'personalized' program that has my name written all over it, and I need to talk about it. I don't know about anyone else because I have no contacts and no points of reference (they have completely isolated me) but I do know what is going on with me and the name of the game is “enhancement” as well as torture. I can thank John Norseen of Lockheed's Intelligence Dept. for his “injecting smart thoughts” (and, I'm convinced he's not dead as is rumored on the internet); at this time I will also recognize UC Berkeley's Graduate School working hand in hand with black-budget aerospace industry, Lockheed Martin, as well as the fine gentlemen at Stanford Research Institute who are joined at the hip with the Pentagon and have been for decades. SRI's Nanotechnology capital of the world in the Silicon Valley or Lawrence Berkeley's Molecular Foundry needs also to be credited for the multitude of nanoparticles, structures, robots, el al that make up the body suit I implants I wear. Last but not least, I must not forget to acknowledge the United States Air Force, the Navy and Coast Guard... and, these are the ones I KNOW OF; I'm sure there may be plenty more.As I started to say, they did something to me last night while I slept – something terrible it feels like. It is now 5 p.m., and I'm feeling somewhat better and more like myself but definitely not entirely so. It's my opinion that you can't continue to have someone tamper with your head/mind and expect things to be okay because it doesn't work that way– something is changed. The losers realized that they might not be able to torture me any longer or at least do as good a job of it with the V2K steel cap Derrick sent me for assembly – they were going to make sure their plans weren't interfered with or should I say “silenced” and so what they did while I slept was to rearrange the wiring in my head so that I now can hear the artificial electronic acoustics as coming from my ears and no longer from my skull... you see, the cap does not go down and cover my ears and this is how they figured they could continue to work me over uninterrupted..This morning I was bombarded with tick, tick, ticking in both ears and other loud artificial electronic noise.. Points at the top and back of skull seemed tightened until I was so dizzy and loss of equilibrium and agitated. I couldn't think or process things clearly or properly.... they change frequencies like you would a broadcast, and I get to feeling like a tuning fork. It was as if I was a zombie with eyes fixed and strong electrical current at the sole of (L) foot running up entire leg. As I am now writing this down, they are recreating the experience for me... they are always EXACTLY with me and don't miss a heart beat. To be so close to human garbage is enough in itself to bring on projectile vomiting in and of itself.
Read more…

INTERVIEW EVIDENCE- Super Soldier Engineering Program- From DARPA Nano Technology Soldier Resource Center.

Posted by ron on January 25, 2010 at 2:13am
INTERVIEW EVIDENCE- Super Soldier Engineering Program- From DARPA Nano Technology Soldier Resource Center. 00 - George.wav, 16.8 MBDARPA MIND CONTROL, HUMAN TRAFFICING, SUPER SOLDIER ENGINEERING PROGRAM- MASS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYInterview with Former US Soldier 00 - George.wav, 16.8 MBSuper Soldier Engineering ProgramFrom DARPAMITNano Technology Soldier Resource Center.Harvard Medical SystemsBoston GeneralBrain Machine Interface
Read more…

19 Jan 2010 "Mailteam works"--victims work trends

Posted by Soleilmavis on January 20, 2010 at 8:30am
(1) Letter from Congressman GARY L. ACKERMAN Dear Mr. Lazersmith: Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns about the USA PATRIOT Act. I want to assure you that I have always been, and will continue to be, an unwavering supporter of protecting our Constitutional guarantee of civil rights. In October 2001, following the tragic events of September 11th, Congress enacted the PATRIOT Act to help defend our country against terrorism. Since its passage, the PATRIOT Act has been the subject of much controversy due to the unprecedented level of power it provided to the Executive branch without proper judicial oversight. Regrettably, many in Congress believed that sacrifices in civil liberties were required in order to protect the American people after September 11, 2001; however, I remain convinced that protecting the American people and upholding civil rights are not mutually exclusive. America absolutely can be safe and secure while maintaining the liberties that preserve our open, democratic society. I voted against the PATRIOT Act when it first came before the House in 2001 because it allowed for indefinitely expanding wiretap capabilities, providing increased access to personal records of U.S. citizens with inadequate judicial review, and allowing the government to detain non-citizens. I also voted against the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005. This bill reauthorized many of the PATRIOT Act programs while still failing to provide the level of judicial review required by our Constitutional principle of separation of powers. For example, one of the more egregious provisions in the PATRIOT Act gives federal investigators authority to examine and access individual records at libraries and bookstores. Under this measure, federal authorities do not have to demonstrate probable cause of criminal activity or of an individual's connection to a foreign power in order to view the personal records of American citizens. I believe that this level of government intervention into Americans' daily lives undermines our democracy. Please know that I support reforms to the PATRIOT Act that restore civil liberties while maintaining the ability of law enforcement to quickly and effectively protect the American people. Of course, if I can be of any further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely GARY L. ACKERMAN Member of Congress (2)Mass Petition-- TO MR HANSPETER THÜR, DATA PROTECTION COMMISSIONER OF SWITZERLAND - regarding your protection of people’s privacy:- PRIVACY COMMISSIONER HAS BANNED GOOGLE FROM SHOWING PEOPLE’S IMAGES ON GOOGLE EARTH. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/14/technology/companies/14google.html Please send them information ABOUT SATELLITE AND BRAIN SURVEILLANCE, DIRECTED ENERGY & NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS, TORTURE AND ABUSE:- EMAIL LIST:- webmaster@edoeb.admin.ch, switzerland@un.int, info@eda.admin.ch, sts@eda.admin.ch, generalsekretaer@eda.admin.ch, polsek@eda.admin.ch, protokoll@eda.admin.ch, pd@eda.admin.ch, dra-ressourcen@eda.admin.ch, info@deza.admin.ch, pa1@eda.admin.ch, pa2-afrika-naher-osten@eda.admin.ch, pa2-asien-ozeanien@eda.admin.ch, pa2-amerika@eda.admin.ch, pa3@eda.admin.ch, pa4@eda.admin.ch, pa5@eda.admin.ch, pa6@eda.admin.ch, pa6-reisehinweise@eda.admin.ch, pa6-krisenmanagement@eda.admin.ch, pa6-konsschutz@eda.admin.ch, pa6-auslandch@eda.admin.ch, prs@eda.admin.ch, dv@eda.admin.ch, dv-ssa@eda.admin.ch, ib@ib.admin.ch, gabler@pressetext.ch, (3) Mind Control Show For affiliates and times go to: http://www.coasttocoastam.com/affiliates 10 pm - 2 am PT Mind Control A doctor of Psychology and Metaphysics, Eldon Taylor will discuss his studies of mind control, brainwashing, subliminal suggestion, and reverse speech. (4) Michael Jackson - A possible victim of remote mind control abuses and tortures They Don't Care About Us (Official Prison Version) lyrics by Michael Jackson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97nAvTVeR6o&feature=related Skin head, dead head Everybody gone bad Situation, aggravation Everybody allegation In the suite, on the news Everybody dog food Bang bang, shot dead Everybody's gone mad All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us Beat me, hate me You can never break me Will me, thrill me You can never kill me Jew me, Sue me Everybody do me Kick me, Kike me Don't you black or white me All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us Tell me what has become of my life I have a wife and two children who love me I am the victim of police brutality, now I'm tired of bein' the victim of hate You're rapin' me of my pride Oh, for God's sake I look to heaven to fulfill its prophecy... Set me free Skin head, dead head Everybody gone bad trepidation, speculation Everybody allegation In the suite, on the news Everybody dog food black man, black mail Throw your brother in jail All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us Tell me what has become of my rights Am I invisible because you ignore me? Your proclamation promised me free liberty, now I'm tired of bein' the victim of shame They're throwing me in a class with a bad name I can't believe this is the land from which I came You know I do really hate to say it The government don't wanna see But if Roosevelt was livin' He wouldn't let this be, no, no Skin head, dead head Everybody gone bad Situation, speculation Everybody litigation Beat me, bash me You can never trash me Hit me, kick me You can never get me All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us Some things in life they just don't wanna see But if Martin Luther was livin' He wouldn't let this be Skin head, dead head Everybody gone bad Situation, segregation Everybody allegation In the suite, on the news Everybody dog food Kick me, Kike me Don't you wrong or right me All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us All I wanna say is that They don't really care about us (5) Laws Against Criminal Uses of Electromagnetic Energy Weapons Soleilmavis has sorted some information of laws against criminal uses of electromagnetic energy weapons https://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/laws-against-criminal-uses-of (6) Some lawsuits filed by Soleilmavis https://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/some-lawsuits-filed-by
Read more…

MANHATTAN BACK STEP PROJECT RADIO Show

Posted by ron on January 19, 2010 at 6:39am
MANHATTAN BACK STEP PROJECT RADIO Showhttp://www.freedomfightersforamerica.com/freedom_fighters_for_america_radioFREEDOM FIGHTERS FOR

AMERICA (WORLD)

(AUTHORIZED )BY CHRIS TO

MANHATTAN

BACK STEP PROJECT

HOSTED BY RON ANGELL

TO INTERVIEW MR EVANS OF RAMAYES.COM INTERVIEW INVOLVING SHIELDING FROM ELECTRONICS

MANHATTAN BACKSTEP

PROJECT

HOSTED BY RON ANGELL

INTERVIEW WITH

DR. MOSS DAVID POSNER

http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-27564/TS-251054.mp3

TARGETED INDIVIDUAL

SERIES

RON ANGELL-7-3-09

HOST: INDEPENDENCE

http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-27564/TS-2

Read more…

USA BIll HR 2977 IH

Posted by Soleilmavis on January 16, 2010 at 6:22pm
HR 2977 IH 107th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2977 To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES October 2, 2001 Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A BILL To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the `Space Preservation Act of 2001'. SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE. Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'. SEC. 3. PERMANENT BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE. The President shall-- (1) implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons of the United States and remove from space any existing space-based weapons of the United States; and (2) immediately order the permanent termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and their components. SEC. 4. WORLD AGREEMENT BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS. The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing a world agreement banning space-based weapons. SEC. 5. REPORT. The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, a report on-- (1) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based weapons required by section 3; and (2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the agreement described in section 4. SEC. 6. NON SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES. Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for-- (1) space exploration; (2) space research and development; (3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or (4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems. SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) The term `space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space. (2)(A) The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following: (i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by-- (I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object; (II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object; (III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or (IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means. (ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)-- (I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B); (II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or (III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person. (B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as-- (i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons; (ii) chemtrails; (iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems; (iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons; (v) laser weapons systems; (vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and (vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons. (C) The term `exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space. More Laws Against Criminal Uses of Electromagnetic Energy Weapons https://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/laws-against-criminal-uses-of
Read more…

European Parliament A4-0005/1999

Posted by Soleilmavis on January 16, 2010 at 6:08pm
European Parliament A4-0005/1999 Paragraph 27 calls for a worldwide ban on weapons that might enable “any form” of the "manipulation of human beings". It is disappointing that nothing seems to have happened so far in response to this. Such weapons must surely include what the US military calls V2K weapons Environment, security and foreign affairs A4-0005/1999 Resolution on the environment, security and foreign policy The European Parliament, - having regard to the motion for a resolution tabled by Mrs Rehn on the potential use of military-related resources for environmental strategies (B4-0551/95), - having regard to the UN study 'Charting potential uses of resources allocated to military activities for civilian endeavours to protect the environment', UN (A46/364, 17 September 1991), - having regard to its resolution of 29 June 1995 on anti-personnel landmines: a murderous impediment to development(1), - having regard to its previous resolutions on non-proliferation and the testing of nuclear weapons and the Canberra Commission report of August 1996 on the abolition of nuclear weapons, - having regard to the International Court's unanimous ruling on the obligation of the nuclear weapon states to negotiate for a ban on nuclear weapons (Advisory Opinion No. 96/22 of 8 July 1996), - having regard to its opinion of 19 April 1996 on the proposal for a Council Decision establishing a Community action programme in the field of civil protection (COM(95)0155 - C4-0221/95 - 95/0098(CNS))(2), - having regard to its earlier resolutions on chemical weapons, - having regard to the outcome of the UN Conferences in Kyoto in 1997 and Rio de Janeiro in 1992, - having regard to the hearing on HAARP and Non-lethal Weapons held by its Foreign Affairs Subcommitee on Security and Disarmament in Brussels on 5 February 1998, - having regard to Rule 148 of its Rules of Procedure, - having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defence Policy and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection (A4-0005/1999), A. whereas the end of the Cold War has radically changed the security situation in the world and whereas the relaxation of military tension has resulted in comprehensive disarmament in the military field in general and in nuclear weapons in particular, resulting in considerable cut-backs in defence budgets, B. whereas, despite this complete transformation of the geostrategic situation since the end of the Cold War, the risk of catastrophic damage to the integrity and sustainability of the global environment, notably its bio-diversity, has not significantly diminished, whether from the accidental or unauthorised firing of nuclear weapons or the authorised use of nuclear weapons based on a perceived but unfounded threat of impending attack, C. whereas this risk could be very considerably reduced within a very short timeframe by the rapid implementation by all nuclear weapons states of the six steps contained in the Canberra Commission"s report concerning, in particular, the removal of all nuclear weapons from the present " hair trigger alert" readiness and the progressive transfer of all weapons into strategic reserve, D. whereas Article VI of the 1968 Treaty on the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) commits all of its parties to undertake "to pursue negotiations in good faith on a treaty on general and complete disarmament" and whereas the Principles and Objectives adopted at the 1995 NPT Conference reaffirmed that the Treaty"s ultimate goal was the complete elimination of nuclear weapons, E. whereas threats to the environment, the flow of refugees, ethnic tension, terrorism and international crime are new and serious threats to security; whereas the ability to deal with various forms of conflict is increasing in importance as the security scene changes, F. whereas the world's resources are being exploited as if they were inexhaustible, which has led to increasingly frequent natural and environmental disasters; whereas such local and regional ecological problems may have considerable impact on international relations; regretting that this has not been more clearly reflected in national foreign, security and defence policies, G. whereas conflicts throughout the world are predominantly at an intra-state rather than inter-state level and, where inter-state conflicts do arise, they are increasingly concerned with access to or the availability of basic vital resources, especially water, food and fuel, H. whereas the access to and availability of such vital natural resources are inherently connected to environmental degradation and pollution, by both cause and effect, whereas it follows logically therefore that conflict prevention must increasingly focus on these issues, I. whereas all those factors, which affect the poorest and most vulnerable populations of the world most of all, are constantly increasing the incidence of so-called 'environmental refugees', resulting both in direct pressure on EU immigration and justice policies, on development assistance and spending on humanitarian aid and, indirectly, in increased security problems for the EU in the form of regional instability in other parts of the world, J. whereas, according to detailed international research collated and published by the Climate Institute in Washington, the number of 'environmental refugees' now exceeds the number of 'traditional refugees' (25 m compared with 22 m) and whereas this figure is expected to double by 2010 and could well rise by substantially more on a worst-case basis, K. whereas, since the end of the Cold War, although the management of global issues has been largely stripped of the previously dominant ideological context and is now much less determined by the question of military balance, this has yet to be reflected in the UN"s system of global governance by emphasising the coherence and effectiveness of both military and non-military components of security policy, L. whereas, nonetheless, the emphasis of a growing proportion of the UN"s work on global political and security issues is essentially non-military, and notably related to the relationship between trade, aid, the environment and sustainable development, M. whereas there is an urgent need to mobilise adequate resources to meet the environmental challenge and whereas very limited resources are available for environmental protection, for which reason a reappraisal of the use of existing resources is called for, N. whereas as military resources have been released the armed forces have had a unique opportunity and ample capacity to support the civilian efforts to cope with the increasing environmental problems, O. whereas military-related resources are by their nature national assets while the environmental challenge is global; whereas ways must therefore be found for international cooperation in the transfer and use of military resources for environmental protection, P. whereas the short-term costs of environmental protection have to be seen in the light of the long-term cost of doing nothing in this field, and whereas there is an increasing need for a cost benefit analysis of various environmental strategies, Q. whereas the common goal of restoring the world's damaged ecosystems cannot be achieved in isolation from the question of the fair exploitation of global resources and whereas there is a need to facilitate international technical cooperation and encourage the transfer of appropriate military-related technology, R. whereas, despite the existing conventions, military research is ongoing on environmental manipulation as a weapon, as demonstrated for example by the Alaska-based HAARP system, S. whereas the general disquiet over ecological decline and environmental crises requires the setting of priorities in the national decision-making process; whereas the individual countries must pool their efforts in response to environmental disasters, 1. Calls on the Commission to present to the Council and Parliament a common strategy, as foreseen by the Amsterdam Treaty, which brings together the CFSP aspects of EU policy with its trade, aid, development and international environmental policies between 2000 and 2010 so as to tackle the following individual issues and the relationships between them: a) agricultural and food production and environmental degradation; b) water shortages and transfrontier water supply; c) deforestation and restoring carbon sinks; d) unemployment, underemployment and absolute poverty; e) sustainable development and climate change; f) deforestation, desertification and population growth; g) the link between all of the above and global warming and the humanitarian and environmental impact of increasingly extreme weather events; 2. Notes that preventive environmental measures are an important instrument of security policy; calls therefore on the Member States to define environmental and health objectives as part of their long-term defence and security assessments, military research and action plans; 3. Recognises the important part played by the armed forces in a democratic society, their national defence role and the fact that peace-keeping and peace-making initiatives can make a substantial contribution to the prevention of environmental damage; 4. Points out that atmospheric and underground nuclear tests have as a result of nuclear radiation fall-out distributed large quantities of radioactive cesium 137, strontium 90 and other cancer inducing isotopes over the whole planet and have caused considerable environmental and health damage in the test areas; 5. Calls on the Commission and the Council, given the fact that several parts of the world are threatened by the uncontrolled, unsafe and unprofessional storage and dumping of nuclear submarines and surface-vessels, as well as their radioactive fuel and leaking nuclear reactors, to take action, considering the high possibility that as a result large regions might soon start to be polluted by the radiation; 6. Demands also that an appropriate solution be found to deal with the chemical and conventional weapons which have been dumped after both World Wars in many places in the seas around Europe as an ' easy" solution to get rid of these stocks and that up to today nobody knows what might be the ecological results in the long run, in particular for the fish and for beach-life; 7. Calls on the Commission and the Council to contribute towards finding a solution to the problem that, as result of ongoing warfare in whole regions of Africa, human and agricultural structures have been ruined and therefore the lands are now subject to environmental disaster in particular by deforestation and erosion leading to desertification; 8. Calls on the military to end all activities which contribute to damaging the environment and health and to undertake all steps necessary to clean up and decontaminate the polluted areas; Use of military resources for environmental purposes 9. Considers that the resources available to reverse or stem damage to the environment are inadequate to meet the global challenge; recommends therefore that the Member States seek to utilise military-related resources for environmental protection by: a) considering which military resources can be made available to the United Nations on a temporary, long-term or stand-by basis as an instrument for international cooperation in environmental disasters or crises; b) drawing up international and European protection programmes using military personnel, equipment and facilities made available under the Partnership for Peace for use in environmental emergencies; c) incorporating objectives for environmental protection and sustainable development in their security concepts; d) ensuring that their armed forces comply with specific environmental rules and that damage caused by them to the environment in the past is made good; e) including environmental considerations in their military research and development programmes; 10. Urges the Commission, since practical experience in the field is limited, to: a) establish the exchange of information on current national experience in environmental applications for military resources; b) take action within the UN to facilitate the global dissemination of environmental data including such data obtained by the use of military satellites and other information-gathering platforms; 11. Calls on the Member States to apply civil environmental legislation to all military activities and to assume responsibility for, and pay for, the investigation, clean-up and decontamination of areas damaged by past military activity, so that such areas can be returned to civil use; this is especially important for the extensive chemical and conventional munition dumps along the coastlines of the EU; 12. Calls on all Member States to formulate environmental and health objectives and action plans so as to enhance the measures taken by their armed forces to protect the environment and health; 13. Calls on the governments of the Member States gradually to improve the protection of the environment by the armed forces by means of training and technical development and by giving all regular and conscript personnel basic training in environmental matters; 14. Considers that environmental strategies should be able to include monitoring the world environment, assessing the data thus collected, coordinating scientific work and disseminating information, exploiting relevant data from national observation and monitoring systems to give a continuous and comprehensive picture of the state of the environment; 15. Notes that the drastic fall in military expenditure could result in substantial problems in certain regions and calls on the Member States to step up their efforts to convert military production facilities and technologies to produce civil goods, and for civil applications, using national programmes and Community initiatives such as the KONVER programme; 16. Stresses the importance of stepping up preventive environmental work with a view to combating environmental and natural disasters; 17. Calls on the Council to do more to ensure that the USA, Russia, India and China sign the 1997 Ottawa Treaty, banning anti-personnel mines, without delay; 18. Believes that the EU should do more to help the victims of landmines and to support the development of mine clearance techniques, and that the development of mine clearance methods should be accelerated; 19. Calls on the Member States to develop environmentally-sound technology for the destruction of weapons; 20. Notes that one of the potentially most serious threats that exist on the EU's doorstep lies in the inadequate monitoring of waste from nuclear arms processing and of biological and chemical weapons stores and in the need for decontamination following military activity; stresses that it is important that the Member States actively promote increased international cooperation, for instance within the UN and the Partnership for Peace, with the aim of destroying such weapons in as environment-friendly a way as possible; 21. Takes the view that all further negotiations on the reduction and the eventual elimination of nuclear weapons must be based on the principles of mutual and balanced reduction commitments; 22. Takes the view that, given the particularly difficult circumstances afflicting the countries of the former Soviet Union, the threat to the global as well as local environment posed by the degradation of the condition of nuclear weapons and materials still held in those countries makes it an even more urgent priority to reach agreement on the further gradual elimination of nuclear weapons; Legal aspects of military activities 23. Calls on the European Union to seek to have the new 'non-lethal' weapons technology and the development of new arms strategies also covered and regulated by international conventions; 24. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the HAARP programme currently being funded in Alaska; 25. Requests the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) Panel to agree to examine the scientific and technical evidence provided in all existing research findings on HAARP to assess the exact nature and degree of risk that HAARP poses both to the local and global environment and to public health generally; 26. Calls on the Commission to examine if there are environmental and public health implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its findings; 27. Calls for an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings; 28. Calls on the Commission and the Council to work for the conclusion of international treaties to protect the environment from unnecessary destruction in the event of war; 29. Calls on the Commission and the Council to work towards the establishment of international standards for the environmental impact of peacetime military activities; 30. Calls on the Council to play an active part in the implementation of the proposals of the Canberra Commission and Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty on nuclear disarmament; 31. Calls on the Council, and the British and French governments in particular, to take the lead within the framework of the NPT and the Conference on Disarmament with regard to the further negotiations towards full implementation of the commitments on nuclear weapons reductions and elimination as rapidly as possible to a level where, in the interim, the global stock of remaining weapons poses no threat to the integrity and sustainability of the global environment; 32. Calls on the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States to advocate the approach taken in this resolution in all further United Nations meetings held under the auspices of or in relation to the NPT and the Conference on Disarmament; 33. Calls on the Council and the Commission, in accordance with Article J.7 of the Treaty on European Union, to report to it on the Union"s position concerning the specific points contained in this resolution within the context of forthcoming meetings of the United Nations, its agencies and bodies, notably the 1999 Preparatory Committee of the NPT, the Conference on Disarmament and all other relevant international fora; 34. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments of the Member States of the European Union and to the United Nations. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN#Contentd14937e476 More Laws Against Criminal Uses of Electromagnetic Energy Weapons https://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/laws-against-criminal-uses-of
Read more…

Maine Act HP 868

Posted by Soleilmavis on January 16, 2010 at 6:01pm
Maine: Chapter 264 H.P. 868 - L.D. 1271 (2005) An Act Regarding Criminal Use of an Electronic Weapon PUBLIC LAWS, First Special Session of the 122nd, CHAPTER 264 H.P. 868 - L.D. 1271, Effective September 17, 2005. Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows: Sec. 1. 17-A MRSA §1004 is enacted to read: §1004. Criminal use of electronic weapon 1. Except as provided in subsection 4, a person is guilty of criminal use of an electronic weapon if the person intentionally, knowingly or recklessly uses an electronic weapon upon any other person. 2. As used in this section, "electronic weapon" means a portable device or weapon from which an electrical current, impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current, impulse, wave or beam is designed to have a disabling effect upon human beings. 3. Criminal use of an electronic weapon is a Class D crime. 4. This section does not apply to the use of an electronic weapon by: A. A law enforcement officer, corrections officer or corrections supervisor engaged in the performance of the law enforcement officer's, corrections officer's or corrections supervisor's public duty if the officer's or corrections supervisor's appointing authority has authorized such use of an electronic weapon; or B. A person using deadly force when that use is for the purpose of: (1) Defending that person or a 3rd person as authorized under section 108, subsection 2; or (2) Defending that person's dwelling place as authorized under section 104, subsections 3 and 4. http://janus.state.me.us/legis/ros/lom/lom122nd/7pub251%2D300/pub251%2D300%2D22.htm More Laws Against Criminal Uses of Electromagnetic Energy Weapons https://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/laws-against-criminal-uses-of
Read more…

Massachusetts Act

Posted by Soleilmavis on January 16, 2010 at 5:30pm
Massachusetts: Chapter 170 of the Acts of 2004 An Act Relative to the Possession of Electronic Weapons Whereas , The deferred operation of this act would tend to defeat its purpose, which is to authorize forthwith certain possession and use of electronic weapons, therefore it is hereby declared to be an emergency law, necessary for the immediate preservation of the public convenience. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 140 of the General Laws is hereby amended by striking out section 131J, as appearing in the 2002 Official Edition, and inserting in place thereof the following section:- Section 131J. No person shall possess a portable device or weapon from which an electrical current, impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current, impulse, wave or beam is designed to incapacitate temporarily, injure or kill, except: (1) a federal, state or municipal law enforcement officer, or member of a special reaction team in a state prison or designated special operations or tactical team in a county correctional facility, acting in the discharge of his official duties who has completed a training course approved by the secretary of public safety in the use of such a device or weapon designed to incapacitate temporarily; or (2) a supplier of such devices or weapons designed to incapacitate temporarily, if possession of the device or weapon is necessary to the supply or sale of the device or weapon within the scope of such sale or supply enterprise. No person shall sell or offer for sale such device or weapon, except to federal, state or municipal law enforcement agencies. A device or weapon sold under this section shall include a mechanism for tracking the number of times the device or weapon has been fired. The secretary of public safety shall adopt regulations governing who may sell or offer to sell such devices or weapons in the commonwealth and governing law enforcement training on the appropriate use of portable electrical weapons. Whoever violates this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $1,000 or by imprisonment in the house of correction for not less than 6 months nor more than 2 1/2 years, or by both such fine and imprisonment. A law enforcement officer may arrest without a warrant any person whom he has probable cause to believe has violated this section. SECTION 2. The secretary of public safety shall develop a uniform protocol directing state police and municipal police officers to collect data pursuant to this act. Such data shall include the number of times the device or weapon has been fired and the identifying characteristics, including the race and gender, of the individuals who have been fired upon. Not later than 1 year after the effective date of this act, the secretary of public safety shall transmit the necessary data to a university in the commonwealth with experience in the analysis of such data, for annual preparation of an analysis and report of its findings. The secretary shall forthwith transmit the university's annual report to the department of the attorney general, the department of state police, the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association, the executive office of public safety and the clerks of the house of representatives and the senate. Approved July 15, 2004. http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/seslaw04/sl040170.htm More Laws Against Criminal Uses of Electromagnetic Energy Weapons https://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/laws-against-criminal-uses-of
Read more…

House Bill 4514

Posted by Soleilmavis on January 16, 2010 at 5:30pm
Michigan: House Bill 4514 (2004) Public Act No. 257 (EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 2004) Public Acts of 2003. REGULAR SESSION OF 2003 STATE OF MICHIGAN 92ND LEGISLATURE ENROLLED HOUSE BILL No. 4514 AN ACT to amend 1931 PA 328, entitled "An act to revise, consolidate, codify and add to the statutes relating to crimes; to define crimes and prescribe the penalties therefor; to provide for restitution under certain circumstances; to provide for the competency of evidence at the trial of persons accused of crime; to provide immunity from prosecution for certain witnesses appearing at such trials; and to repeal certain acts and parts of acts inconsistent with or contravening any of the provisions of this act," by amending sections 200i, 200k, 200l, 204, 207, 209, 210, 211a, and 212a (MCL 750.200i, 750.200k, 750.200l, 750.204, 750.207, 750.209, 750.210, 750.211a, and 750.212a), sections 200i and 200k as added by 1998 PA 207, section 200l as added by 2001 PA 135, sections 204 and 211a as amended by 1998 PA 206, sections 207, 209, and 210 as amended by 1998 PA 208, and section 212a as amended by 2002 PA 140, and by adding section 200m. The People of the State of Michigan enact: Sec. 200i. (1) A person shall not manufacture, deliver, possess, transport, place, use, or release any of the following for an unlawful purpose: (a) A harmful biological substance or a harmful biological device. (b) A harmful chemical substance or a harmful chemical device. (c) A harmful radioactive material or a harmful radioactive device. (d) A harmful electronic or electromagnetic device. (2) A person who violates subsection (1) is guilty of a crime as follows: (a) Except as provided in subdivisions (b) to (e), the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both. (b) If the violation directly or indirectly results in property damage, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $15,000.00, or both. (c) If the violation directly or indirectly results in personal injury to another individual other than serious impairment of a body function or death, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 25 years or a fine of not more than $20,000.00, or both. (d) If the violation directly or indirectly results in serious impairment of a body function to another individual, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for life or any term of years or a fine of not more than $25,000.00, or both. (e) If the violation directly or indirectly results in the death of another individual, the person is guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole and may be fined not more than $40,000.00, or both. Sec. 200k. (1) Sections 200h to 200j do not apply to any of the following: (a) A member of the military forces of the United States or of this state acting under a lawful order or while engaged in a lawful military activity. (b) A law enforcement officer enforcing the laws of the United States or of this state or while engaged in a lawful law enforcement activity. (c) A person engaged in self-defense or the lawful defense of another person. (d) Unless acting with an unlawful purpose, a person acting within the scope of his or her employment under a rule or a permit or license of the United States or of this state. (2) Unless acting with an unlawful purpose, a person who within the scope of his or her employment violates a rule or a provision of a permit or license issued by the United States or this state to manufacture, deliver, possess, transport, place, classify, label, use, or release a substance or device shall not be prosecuted under this chapter. (3) This chapter does not prohibit the possession and use of a device that uses electro-muscular disruption technology as permitted under section 224a. Sec. 200l. (1) A person shall not commit an act with the intent to cause an individual to falsely believe that the individual has been exposed to a harmful biological substance, harmful biological device, harmful chemical substance, harmful chemical device, harmful radioactive material, harmful radioactive device, or harmful electronic or electromagnetic device. (2) A person who violates subsection (1) is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both. Sec. 200m. A charge under or a conviction or punishment for a violation of this chapter does not prevent a person from being charged with, convicted of, or punished for any other violation of law arising from the same transaction. Sec. 204. (1) A person shall not send or deliver to another person or cause to be taken or received by any person any kind of explosive substance or any other dangerous thing with the intent to frighten, terrorize, intimidate, threaten, harass, injure, or kill any person, or with the intent to damage or destroy any real or personal property without the permission of the property owner or, if the property is public property, without the permission of the governmental agency having authority over that property. (2) A person who violates this section is guilty of a crime as follows: (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivisions (b) to (e), the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both. (b) If the violation damages the property of another person, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $15,000.00, or both. (c) If the violation causes physical injury to another individual, other than serious impairment of a body function, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 25 years or a fine of not more than $20,000.00, or both. (d) If the violation causes serious impairment of a body function to another individual, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for life or any term of years or a fine of not more than $25,000.00, or both. (e) If the violation causes the death of another individual, the person is guilty of a felony and shall be imprisoned for life without eligibility for parole and may be fined not more than $40,000.00, or both. Sec. 207. (1) A person shall not place an explosive substance in or near any real or personal property with the intent to frighten, terrorize, intimidate, threaten, harass, injure, or kill any person, or with the intent to damage or destroy any real or personal property without the permission of the property owner or, if the property is public property, without the permission of the governmental agency having authority over that property. (2) A person who violates this section is guilty of a crime as follows: (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivisions (b) to (e), the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both. (b) If the violation damages the property of another person, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $15,000.00, or both. (c) If the violation causes physical injury to another individual, other than serious impairment of a body function, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 25 years or a fine of not more than $20,000.00, or both. (d) If the violation causes serious impairment of a body function to another individual, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for life or for any term of years or a fine of not more than $25,000.00, or both. (e) If the violation causes the death of another individual, the person is guilty of a felony and shall be imprisoned for life without eligibility for parole and may be fined not more than $40,000.00, or both. Sec. 209. (1) A person who places an offensive or injurious substance or compound in or near to any real or personal property with intent to wrongfully injure or coerce another person or to injure the property or business of another person, or to interfere with another person's use, management, conduct, or control of his or her business or property is guilty of a crime as follows: (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivisions (b) to (e), the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both. (b) If the violation damages the property of another person, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $15,000.00, or both. (c) If the violation causes physical injury to another individual, other than serious impairment of a body function, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 25 years or a fine of not more than $20,000.00, or both. (d) If the violation causes serious impairment of a body function to another individual, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for life or for any term of years or a fine of not more than $25,000.00, or both. (e) If the violation causes the death of another individual, the person is guilty of a felony and shall be imprisoned for life without eligibility for parole and may be fined not more than $40,000.00, or both. (2) A person who places an offensive or injurious substance or compound in or near to any real or personal property with the intent to annoy or alarm any person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine of not more than $3,000.00, or both. Sec. 210. (1) A person shall not carry or possess an explosive or combustible substance or a substance or compound that when combined with another substance or compound will become explosive or combustible or an article containing an explosive or combustible substance or a substance or compound that when combined with another substance or compound will become explosive or combustible, with the intent to frighten, terrorize, intimidate, threaten, harass, injure, or kill any person, or with the intent to damage or destroy any real or personal property without the permission of the property owner or, if the property is public property, without the permission of the governmental agency having authority over that property. (2) A person who violates subsection (1) is guilty of a crime as follows: (a) Except as provided in subdivisions (b) to (e), the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both. (b) If the violation damages the property of another person, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $15,000.00, or both. (c) If the violation causes physical injury to another individual, other than serious impairment of a body function, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 25 years or a fine of not more than $20,000.00, or both. (d) If the violation causes serious impairment of a body function to another individual, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for life or for any term of years or a fine of not more than $25,000.00, or both. (e) If the violation causes the death of another individual, the person is guilty of a felony and shall be imprisoned for life without eligibility for parole and may be fined not more than $40,000.00, or both. Sec. 211a. (1) A person shall not manufacture, buy, sell, furnish, or have in his or her possession any device that is designed to explode or that will explode upon impact or with the application of heat or a flame, or that is highly incendiary, with the intent to frighten, terrorize, intimidate, threaten, harass, injure, or kill any person, or with the intent to damage or destroy any real or personal property without the permission of the property owner or, if the property is public property, without the permission of the governmental agency having authority over that property. (2) A person who violates subsection (1) is guilty of a crime as follows: (a) Except as provided in subdivisions (b) to (e), the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both. (b) If the violation damages the property of another person, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $15,000.00, or both. (c) If the violation causes physical injury to another individual, other than serious impairment of a body function, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 25 years or a fine of not more than $20,000.00, or both. (d) If the violation causes serious impairment of a body function to another individual, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for life or any term of years or a fine of not more than $25,000.00, or both. (e) If the violation causes the death of another individual, the person is guilty of a felony and shall be imprisoned for life without eligibility for parole and may be fined not more than $40,000.00, or both. Sec. 212a. (1) If a person violates this chapter and the violation is committed in or is directed at a vulnerable target, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years. The court may order a term of imprisonment imposed under this section to be served consecutively to the term of imprisonment for the underlying violation. (2) As used in this section, "vulnerable target" means any of the following: (a) A child care center or day care center as defined in section 1 of 1973 PA 116, MCL 722.111. (b) A health care facility or agency as defined in section 20106 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.20106. (c) A building or structure open to the general public. (d) A church, synagogue, mosque, or other place of religious worship. (e) A public, private, denominational, or parochial school offering developmental kindergarten, kindergarten, or any grade 1 through 12. (f) An institution of higher education. (g) A stadium. (h) A transportation structure or facility open to the public, including, but not limited to, a bridge, a tunnel, a public highway, or a railroad. (i) An airport. As used in this subdivision, "airport" means that term as defined in section 2 of the aeronautics code of the state of Michigan, 1945 PA 327, MCL 259.2. (j) Port facilities. As used in this subdivision, "port facilities" means that term as defined in section 2 of the Hertel-Law-T. Stopczynski port authority act, 1978 PA 639, MCL 120.102. (k) A public services facility. As used in this subdivision, "public services facility" means any of the following facilities whether publicly or privately owned: (i) A natural gas refinery, natural gas storage facility, or natural gas pipeline. (ii) An electric, steam, gas, telephone, power, water, or pipeline facility. (iii) A nuclear power plant, nuclear reactor facility, or nuclear waste storage facility. (l) A petroleum refinery, petroleum storage facility, or petroleum pipeline. (m) A vehicle, locomotive or railroad car, aircraft, or watercraft used to provide transportation services to the public or to provide for the movement of goods in commerce. (n) A building, structure, or other facility owned or operated by the federal government, by this state, or by a political subdivision or any other instrumentality of this state or of a local unit of government. Enacting section 1. This amendatory act takes effect January 1, 2004. Enacting section 2. This amendatory act does not take effect unless House Bill No. 4513 of the 92nd Legislature is enacted into law. This act is ordered to take immediate effect. Clerk of the House of Representatives Secretary of the Senate Approved by the Governor Michigan: House Bill 4514 (2004) Public Act No. 257 Introduced by Reps. Van Regenmorter, Nofs, Howell, Caswell, Richardville, Palsrok, Caul, Hune, Newell, DeRoche, Bisbee, Middaugh, Brandenburg, Acciavatti, LaJoy, Pastor, Casperson, Tabor, Drolet, Milosch, Bieda, Lipsey, Gieleghem, Meisner, Moolenaar and Ward. http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2003-2004/publicact/htm/2003-PA-0257.htm More Laws Against Criminal Uses of Electromagnetic Energy Weapons https://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/laws-against-criminal-uses-of
Read more…