SOL, YOU SHOULD CONSIDER THESE THREATS RATHER THAN YOUR OWN CASE.
All Posts (12221)
Sort by
http://stopmensonges.com/armes-silencieuses-pour-guerres-tranquilles-2/
Toronto Police, Canadian torturers conveyed threats, death threats to me. How? Nothing new. Just like each torturer in the world.
Before they conveyed or when they conveyed these threats, did they remember or recall the threat which they received? They couldn’t because they are :” Fear the strong; bully the weak.”
The real question is : Do those superiors who stand behind Toronto Police, Canadian torturers know there is a golden rule on the world:
“One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself. One should not treat others in ways that one would not like to be treated.”
Canadian torture victim
Robin Yan
SOLEILMAVIS, LET CONCENTRATE ON INFORMING YOUR ARMY FORCES, POLICE FORCE, AUTHORITY, GOVERMENT ABOUT THIS THREAT TO YOUR NATIONAL SECURITY !!! ONLY THESE CAN HELP YOU REVENGE YOUR 12-YEARS IN GRAVE !!!
SOLEILMAVIS, LET CONCENTRATE ON INFORMING YOUR ARMY FORCES, POLICE FORCE, AUTHORITY, GOVERMENT ABOUT THIS THREAT TO YOUR NATIONAL SECURITY !!! ONLY THESE CAN HELP YOU REVENGE YOUR 12-YEARS IN GRAVE !!!
SOLEILMAVIS, LET CONCENTRATE ON INFORMING YOUR ARMY FORCES, POLICE FORCE, AUTHORITY, GOVERMENT ABOUT THIS THREAT TO YOUR NATIONAL SECURITY !!! ONLY THESE CAN HELP YOU REVENGE YOUR 12-YEARS IN GRAVE !!!
SOLEILMAVIS, LET CONCENTRATE ON INFORMING YOUR ARMY FORCES, POLICE FORCE, AUTHORITY, GOVERMENT ABOUT THIS THREAT TO YOUR NATIONAL SECURITY !!! ONLY THESE CAN HELP YOU REVENGE YOUR 12-YEARS IN GRAVE !!!
SOLEILMAVIS, LET CONCENTRATE ON INFORMING YOUR ARMY FORCES, POLICE FORCE, AUTHORITY, GOVERMENT ABOUT THIS THREAT TO YOUR NATIONAL SECURITY !!! ONLY THESE CAN HELP YOU REVENGE YOUR 12-YEARS IN GRAVE !!!
...
https://www.facebook.com/HumanRightsWatch
You all understand ?
I am not endorsing Evian water here ( I don't even drink bottled water), but these cuties are the best! Doctored vid but still the best to me if you want to overlook the technology. I try to live my life and enjoy what I can while I can. So please, enjoy this vid if you love babies, especially ones that dance this cool.
Wish I danced like that when I was a babe myself, many rains ago. Best to you all.
http://blog.petflow.com/hands-down-this-is-the-cutest-most-fun-commercial-of-all-time-watch-this/
Did The Scarborough Hospital and its psychiatrist conspired with Toronto Police and Canadian torturers to commit “medical torture”? Did the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario lie to dismiss your complaint? How is it possible?
Here you are, Page 3 of decision letter from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. You have seen other part of its decision letter.
1) “As already noted, he refused to consent to the release of his medical record.”
2) “He sought access to any voice recording of the medical examination that may exist.”
3) “Dr. Choy provided a letter of response dated April 28, 2008. He noted that his response was restricted due to the lack of the consent.”
4) “ The Committee notes that, without consent…” I filed a complaint against The Scarborough Hospital and its psychiatrist who committed “medical torture”. I refused them both, the College and the psychiatrist? Am I having problem? Or, they are having problem? This was the way they refused my request for the access to my full medical record. This was the way they dismissed my complaint against the doctor who committed medical torture. This is the way they commit systematic torture.
Canadian torture victim Robin Yan
copy and paste if it will not open
www.eventjoy.com/e/los-angeles-event-speaker--matt-barasch-234471
IF THE SIGNAL IS WIRELESS AND SEEMS AS IF THEY SEE WHAT WE SEE THAN IT GOES BOTH WAY
MEANING
IF WE ARE BEEN FOLLOWED AND ATACKED WITH THIS DEVICE WIRELESSLY, AND THEY APARENTLY SEE WHAT WE VISUALIZE SEE AND KNOW WHEN THEY HAVE CAUSED US PAIN OR TORMENT, THEN THAT MEANS WE ARE ALSO TRANSMITING THAT INFORMATION FOR THEM TO SEE
THE QUESTION I HAVE FOR YOU GUYS IS THIS
CAN WE ALSO USE THAT TECHNOLOGY TO OUR ADVANTAGE?
AS I SEE IT, WE HAVE MANY OF US BEEN UNDER ATTACK BY THIS INDIVIDUALS,
HAS ANYONE TRIED TO FLIP IT AGAINST THEM?
SOME PEOPLE HEAR VOICES AS NIKI MINAJ AND ALSO THE GIRL ON THIS VIDEO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9EdPvgb-Oo
IF THAT IS SO IF WE ARE ALSO TRANSMITING TO THEM, HAVE YOU GUYS TRIED TORMENTING THEM USING THE SAME SOUND METHODS YOU HEAR FROM THEM?
FRUSTRAIT THEM THE SAME WAY THEY FRUSTRAIT YOU
ALSO SINCE THEY ARE ALREADY TOMENTING US AND FOLLOWING US WATCHING WHAT WE DO, THEN TRY TO SPREAD THE INFORMATION EVERYWHERE, EVERY SOCIAL NETWORK, AND WARN THE MULTITUDES.
SIMPLY THROWING IDEAS THERE
In the State party, I and we tried everything I/we could, hoping:
1) The State party and politicians in charge can stop their ongoing acts of torture
2) Investigate our allegations of torture, or cruel, inhumane, degrading treatment com...mitted by anyone
However, they don’t do anything. So, their torture keeps going. They refuse to investigate any allegations.
In 2006, I filed complaint against The Scarborough Hospital’s psychiatrist with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, who helped Toronto Police, Canadian Torturers commit “ torture”, “ medical torture” with The Scarborough Hospital.( I believe you have read some documents about my torture case.) They fabricated my medical report, and refused my request for my full medical record. He even stated: “ You don’t trust police. That testifies you are having mental problems.”
It took me so long, and in the end they refused me. This is their conspiracy. How did they refuse me? How did they violate my/our basic human rights regardless of facts and law? Please see The College’s decision:
“ The investigator reviewed the report and his concerns with him. Mr. Yan refused to provide the consents required for the College to undertake an investigation…”
Is this logical? Is this a lie? I filed a complaint. I refused to provide the consents. Actually, I singed and mailed it to them. Why did they do this? Some people were behind them. In the “ presentation of Canada’s Sixth Report to the Committee against Torture”, dated May 21, 2012, “ the State party promised on behalf of its all provinces to the Committee: “ Review bodies exist.” Do these or those bodies really review?
This is our situation. If you need their full decision letter, I will forward it to you. Thanks.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=654133807975247&set=a.170010383054261.50133.100001359027296&type=1&theater
or,
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=654133974641897&set=o.84508919453&type=1&theater
Canadian torture victim
Robin Yan
This is a continuing dialogue on the Greenwald vs Hayden Munk Debates debate. This comment (modified in one sentence or two) was added on 05.06.2014.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What I wrote was intended, in part, to generate precisely this healthy dialogue. Had I been writing a paper, I would have elaborated much more on the idea…
Although an observation of the political state of affairs of many nations suggests that an inverse relationship that you reference (and which I appear to imply in my post) generally exists specifically in nations where liberties are seriously curtailed or close to non-existent, the appearance of this relationship is truly a facade. The ‘security’ achieved, and often cited as a justification for gross abuses in these nation-states, is in fact a perverted form since the ‘security’ practices seldom seek to, nor ever accomplish, political security for the individual. Instead, the perverted ‘security’ practices are used to secure the political and economic positions and agendas of the non-representative regimes or governments in non-democratic states. And to secure ‘secret’ agendas in governments, agencies, as well as other entities in democratic states who stand to benefit from suppressing the civil liberties.
The resultant societal product is something quite contorted. In both cases (democracies and non-representative states), loss of liberties due to practices that masquerade as serving the overall security do not lead to gains in security. In both cases, the people live in environments of fear and feelings of being under chronic a threat, from their own governments.
Civil liberties fall in the political security, an element in the framework, the stability of the social order (Buzzan et al), an erosion of liberties under the camouflage of security becomes itself, a threat - an internal threat - the very threat that, paradoxically, balanced security is intended to keep at bay, and it is the obligation of the citizenry, democracy or dictatorship, to address and correct.
Civil liberties cannot thrive in an environment that is devoid of security and security needs civil liberties to effectively function. One cannot exist without the other, hence my allusion to the mean.
Best to you.
