The European Human Brain project and the United States Brain Initiative claim that they are at the initial stages of understanding how to human brain works. However, I and hundreds of thousands of other non-consensual victims of neuro-scientific research are fully aware that advances in brain science are far ahead of what the general public are being informed about and that such knowledge is being secretly used against the human race on a massive scale throughout the world in order to further control and enslave humanity. Because a differential in knowledge leads to a differential in power, those in possession of scientific knowledge relating to how to manipulate the human brain from a distance are secretly using it to manipulate and hurt many human beings by wireless means. These evil neuro operatives and neuro agents are believed to be a multi- national criminal cabal that operate black projects in all countries throughout the world and they are all working together to take over the world using these advanced technologies. It is believed that they also control the main stream media.
Particulates of neural dust are being sent into human brains by chemtrail spraying of the skies over our heads. Ultrasound powers the neural dust and activates the system for full monitoring of a random selection of human beings. This system allows ordinary people going about their lives to be interrogated by unknown neuro operatives who do their work by wireless means and from a distance. This random selection of human beings suddenly begin to hear the voices of their interrogaters coming from inside their heads. I have been and still am a victim of this non-consensual neuro scientific research for many years and my brain and body are wirelessly linked to the computer system of the unknown criminal neuro operatives. They use energy weapons to see inside my brain and body which aids in their scientific research. They can and do read my inner thoughts and reply to them in real time. They have built a three dimensional image of my body so that they can monitor my movements throughout my home all day, every day. All of the electrical energy which is generated by my brain and body on a constant basis is uploaded to their computer network for elaborate data analysis and still further analysis later which is then carried out by another team of scientists who I am informed work at Fort Meade, Maryland, U.S.A. I was born in and have lived in Ireland, Europe for the whole of my life since 1960. Not alone can the teams of unknown neuro operatives who wirelessly interrogate me force me to listen to their voices on a constant basis, they also send me moving images, odours, mild pain signals, electric shocks, feelings, sensations and forced muscle movement. Whenever I am brain to brain linked with one of these neuro operatives, if they laugh I am forced against my will to laugh also. If they speak during the brain to brain link I am forced to speak whatever they say, and this happens entirely against my will and without my permssion. This is commonly known as forced speech among targeted individuals, but because the uninitiated human race can not conceptualize such advanced technology they generally do not believe us when we tell them of our experiences. Naivete has no place in the lives of individuals living in this century of unparalleled advances in science and technology.
I write a blog most days which I post online in which I detail a small amount of what the neuro opertives say to me whenever they reproduce their voices inside my head, which is almost constantly. Some of what they say to me is very insulting and frightening. I post it online so that others who might experience a similar fate at some time in the future would be better prepared for the shock. Here below is a small sample of what these unknown voices have said to me and about me to their colleagues in the past day or two. They sometimes tend to contradict each other because there are many and varied staff working on this black budget neuro research, who all have different points of view, and who all speak to me via the invisible neurolink which connects us. I do not receive payment for this writing and I do not wish to receive payment for it. My only wish is to help expose large scale corruption throughout the world.
"You have become a nuicance due to your online blogs and that is why I am going to calm the situation down by allowing you to write whatever you like but then ring fencing it within a certain radius of control. Now, write whatever you like about us and our work. We dont like you."
"We are psychologically torturing you because we are paid well to do so, and we are also passing on information to you to give to the public so that we will not be psychologically tortured ourselves some day by the self-same system which we are using on, you due to possible expansion of the system throughout the world in the future. Also, we are under a level of unforseen control ourselves."
"What happened to the dishes. Why aren't they washed.?"
I heard one of the neuro agents saying the following via the neuro link "We have to deal." I asked what that phrase meant, precisely. The neuro agent replied using the neurolink and I heard his voice coming from inside my head while saying the following "We have to take this system up a notch with regard to investigating you." I then asked "Have you any reason to investigate me". The reply I received back was as follows "No. We have no reason to investigate you."
"The inner bearings of Gretta Fahey have been destroyed by too much information and now they can't be deciphered properly."
"My staff are charged with larceny. They have stolen information that I put out and they have made it their own. "
I heard the following being said to a member of the neuro staff by another member of staff "You will get your hands off for speaking to me like that."
"Digestive information is what I am looking for."
"I will smather you into a million pieces."
"Why aren't you disciplined like the others."
"She is like a vulture." (I disagree with this assessment of me by an unknown neuro staff member because I dont eat meat, fish, chicken or eggs. I am nothing like a vulture.
"What is this information coming through from her clothing? We can't get our normal residues at all." I believe the reason this was said by the neuro operatives is because I do not wash my clothes in laundry detergent because it has been blended with particulates which can be used to assess how clean the clothes somebody is wearing are by an operative while they stand near the wearer and using a device to read the clothes. I always wash my clothes in dishwashing detergent which I have heard does not contain such particulates. I wash my clothes daily but I like to do everything I can to deter the neuro operatives from collecting private data from my person.
Last night the neuro operatives were conducting experiements in my right lung and they inadvertantly caused me to feel extreme pain in my lung. They said the following "sub collar job failed, very painful for the lady."
I have found through experimentation over many years some ways to deter the neuro operatives from obtaining information from my brain and body. One successful way is to hold an analogue radio close to my brain or body while setting it to medium wave and while constantly moving the dial back and over from station to station. Even if ther is nothing available only white noise this is enough to completely stop them in their attempts to gain the information they wish to analyse from my brain and body.
speech (7)
I am an unwilling Irish targeted individual of wirelessly enabled remote neural monitoring and remote neural manipulation. I am aware of at least a dozen other Irish individuals, some of who I personally know, who are being subjected to wirelessly enabled remote neural monitoring as well as remote neural manipulation. We do not know who our aggressors are. We have never met anybody who claimed to be wirelessly targeting us on a constant basis for years at a time. I believe that wirelessly enabled technology has been implanted in my brain and body which links me to a network of computers combined with a super-computer. A system of reading my thoughts and replying to them in real time is being used against me. Signals are being injected into my brain and body which can make me see images which I do not wish to see, as well as making me hear words and sounds that I do not wish to hear, as well as making me feel sensations which I do not wish to feel, while also making a selection of my facial and neck muscles move against my will. I believe that the process of forced muscle movement is being enabled by programmable bio-chips having been imbedded in my muscles through inhalation and ingestion as well as a variety of other means. I am aware of several other human beings who are reporting forced muscle movement including experiencing their own hand hitting them against their will. This phenomenon is real and is widely reported as being easily achievable by main stream neuro weapons experts.
Technology exists now that can force a targeted individual to enunciate words and whole sentences in a court of law that said targeted individual has no wish to enunciate. A phenomenon called forced speech is being used to induce this process. Forced speech may be induced in targeted individuals by unknown operatives who wirelessly manipulating the human motor cortex in combination with simultaneously wirelessly manipulating the human vocal cords in order to force that targeted individual to enunciate words and sentences that they do not wish to enunciate while simultaneously claiming to agree with sentiments that they vehemently do not agree with. The criminal neuro operatives who induce forced speech in an unwilling targeted individual work from an unknown location by the use of wireless means.
THE SIGNS OF NEURO SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING.
I am and have been a non-consensual and totally unwilling neuro weapons test subject for the past fifteen years. During that time I was frequently informed via voice to skull communication technology which I constantly hear coming from inside my head that if the criminal neuro weapons operatives ever succeeded in enslaving me by neuro technological means that they would force me to marry and they would then take over ...my life and that my own family would not know that I had become a neuro slave because at that stage they implied that they would be able to control the speech centres of my brain.
For that reason I have written a list of what to look for in a neuro slave which is information which I obtained from the link herebelow.
The neuro slaves may be branded with tattoos using words such as cash.
The victims may show sudden changes of dress and behaviour.
They may suddenly have possessions that they usually can not afford.
They may have unusually long work hours.
They may have new relationships with individuals that are noticeably older.
The victims may have difficulty making eye contact.
They may have untreated cuts, bruises, burns, broken bones.
The victims may make frequent trips.
They may not be allowed to speak independently. Other people may insist on answering
questions for them.
Non-consensual neuro weapons research subjects are being wirelessly tethered to a super computer via the either micro or nano technology inside the human body, much of which was put there by illegal chemtrail spraying of the skies over our heads and some of what may have been put there by covertly injecting the non-consensual neuro weapons research subject with micro-transmitters.
After many years, when non-consensual neuro weapons research subjects have the motor cortex of ...their brains partially mapped to a certain level, then the criminal neuro research operatives can remote control any muscle in the body of the research subject against their will. In this way, good will human beings throughout many parts of the world are becoming neuro slaves.
Neuro slaves can be forced both to speak and to act against their wills.
Neuro slaves can be forced to place their hands on a hot stove.
Neuro slaves can be forced to hit themselves repeatedly against their wills.
Neuro slaves can be forced to cut off their own finger or even all of their fingers in their left hand.
Neuro slaves must obey all instructions from unknown slave masters who speak to the neuro slave by placing their voices inside the head of the neuro slave by means of either brain to brain interface or a number of other military communication methodologies.
Neuro enslavement may be achievable in whole populations at one time by means of allowing an artificial intelligence program to partially brain map the motor cortex of all of the population of that country.
Some senior politicians may already be neuro slaves.
We must urgently demolish all microwave transmittors.
We must stop all millimeter wave transmitters from being erected anywhere in the world urgently.
Mobile phone towers are the linchpin that holds the wireless human enslavement protocol in place for the following reasons:- Under sea fiber optic cables transmit 99% of all international data. There are now over 300 undersea fiber optic cables stretching 550,000 miles. Each cable is less than three inches thick and houses several optical fibres. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dAESYkflOU
There are no satellites. The existence of satellites was created by disinformation agents. The existence of satellites is a hoax. Firstly, there is no material that can resist the heat of the thermosphere which is 2000 degrees celsius. Secondly, air and space can not co-exist side by side. This feat has never been achieved in a laboratory setting. It is biologically impossible for space to even exist other than air. This would indiciate that satellites and space travel have all been hoaxed in order to steal tax dollars and in order to make a cabal of would-be enslavers appear to have more power than they have. If we have mobile phone towers dismantled the human race would have our freedom returned to us immediately.
Please share.
Eight hundred evil-doers, mostly composed of dark luciferians and satanists have decided to inform the rest of the seven billion members of the human race that we are no longer entitled to freedom of speech even though we have enjoyed freedom of speech for five hundred million years or more. We the seven billion members of the human race will continue to practice freedom of speech for the next five hundred million years in spite of these deluded megalomaniac dark occultists who have lost touch with reality and have begun to play God. They think they are gods on this earth now that some scientists have given them directed energy weapons to play with and showed them what buttons to press in order to transmit pain signals and voices to us by wireless means. They can now transmit pain signals wirelessly to us because both our brains and bodies are imbedded with nano-bots because of all the chemtrail spraying our skies. We aught to urgently disempower them and render their weapons impotent simply by dismantling all mobile phone towers and stopping all chemtrail spraying of our skies.
http://blog.bioethics.gov/2011/02/28/read-your-mind-not-in-a-%E2%80%98million-light-years%E2%80%99/
A, "million light years", is not an answer that describes time. Included at the bottom are comments, mine included. Peter Rosenholm
blog.Bioethics.gov
The blog of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Read your mind? Not in a ‘million light years’
Written by John Donnelly on February 28, 2011 — 8 Comments
The members of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues received a primer today on recent advances in the use of medical technology on neuro-imagery. It was a session that Dr. Gregory House of the TV show House would have found fascinating – especially the multiple uses of MRI machines to help detect hard-to-diagnosis diseases.
The Commission is considering whether to embark on examining ethical issues surrounding the uses of neuro-imagery and genetic testing.
A panel of scientists said that one cutting-edge ethical issue now involves how private companies could use this technology for what they called “neuro-marketing” in order to advance the sale of products.
But one issue not on the table: whether new technology can help read minds — because it can’t.
Such technology “is a million light years away,” said Dr. Martha Farah, the Walter H. Annenberg Professor in Natural Science and Director of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Pennsylvania.
Science isn’t close to enabling researchers to read the thoughts of others, Farah said in an interview. Still, though, she knows people fear that it will happen. She said she gets asked about it frequently.
“We are nowhere near being able to read sentences or thoughts that are the equivalent of sentences,” Farah said. “But it is the case that we can derive a fair amount of personal information including current mental states, such as mood, intentions, and desire to buy an object” from Functional MRIs, or fMRIs.
But the interpretation of brain imagery, captured in fMRIs, was far from perfect, she said. “There is a lot of significant personal information from fMRIs. It is with a degree of accuracy that is far from perfect, but is well above chance.”
That leads Farah to be wary of neuro-marketing. “The biggest ethical issue to me is the fact that many of the most exciting new applications of brain imaging are being developed entirely with private corporate funding for commercial purposes,” she said. “I don’t think that is going to give us the best new contributions to society, and I don’t think that is going to lead to the greatest transparency concerning what these scans can do.”
Posted in Liveblog Coverage | Tagged Dr. Gregory House, Dr. Martha Farah, neuro-marketing, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, reading minds, TV show House
8 Comments to “Read your mind? Not in a ‘million light years’”
You can follow all the replies to this entry through the comments feed.
1.
sc's Gravatar sc
March 1, 2011 at 1:33 pm | Permalink
I believe that it is critically important to consider the ramifications of issues such as these preemptively. While it may not be exactly hyperbolic to state that we are “nowhere near being able to read … thoughts,” as soon as a company thinks this is a worthy goal and starts to invest heavily in it, the growth will be rapid.
I do not believe that anyone should at all suggest that this is an impossible endeavor, unfortunately. Just because our current imaging technologies are not up to the task does not mean that a more sensitive measure, or a paradigm shifting one, may not be on the horizon.
I would agree that we are relatively far from such technology, but with the current accelerations of technological growth and neuroscience understanding, it would not be surprising to see within the next 50 years.
Also, a light year is a measure of distance and not time. So, unless there is a suggestion that no one within a radius of 9.4×10^21 m has access to this technology, then that quote may have been given in error.
Reply
*
Martha Farah's Gravatar Martha Farah
March 1, 2011 at 6:24 pm | Permalink
Hello and thanks for the reasonable comments. I agree that one should never discount the possibility of a “paradigm shift,” but I feel confident that the extrapolation of current brain imaging methods will not get us there. And given concerns about mind reading with current technology expressed by some members of the public in attendance, it seemed worth making the point in loud & clear terms. There is some impressive work being done to read mental information from the brain. But relative to real mind-reading, it’s like climbing trees to get to the moon — you can make some progress away from the ground and toward the moon, but only so far. Speaking of celestial bodies, I was using a distance analogy — we’re nowhere close, we’re light years away — but it did get lost in quotation! Thanks again for your thoughts. Martha
Reply
2.
tmk81's Gravatar tmk81
March 2, 2011 at 12:18 pm | Permalink
Just because public research is far from mind reading doesn’t mean it is not being done… clandestinely. Even Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, admits “Our biggest problem has always [been] how do we get into the head of somebody”. Note the word BIGGEST. It’s narrow views like those of Dr. Martha Farah that have been leading society to be caught with its pants down.
Reply
3.
Gary D Chance's Gravatar Gary D Chance
March 3, 2011 at 4:46 pm | Permalink
The use of language here is extremely important. There’s a skip from neuroimaging to science with the conclusion derived from neuroimaging applied on the broader level of science. There is a whole other area of neuroscience involving detecting and decoding electrical impulses which was not even discussed at all. Neuroimaging fundamentally measures mass which limits what can be done with respect to brain research drastically.
Although we saw the letter “M” on the back of the brain by neuroimaging techniques where sight images are processed, we did not see any neurological work that reflected decoding electrical impulses such as was reported by the BBC News in 1999 where the ability to look through a cat’s eyes was accomplished: http://bbc.in/gQyBtJ The Commission has utterly failed to bring to the surface this aspect of neuroscience today.
I make a similar analogy between mind reading today versus the inadequacy of neuroimaging to accomplish this at all. There has been a lack of any consideration given by the Commission to that branch of neuroscience which decodes electrical impluses that would reveal thoughts (words, sentences and images). This is completely different from neuroimaging.
I am quite concerned about this dismissal which is valid for neuroimaging being used on a broader basis when applied to science or other areas of neuroscience. My concern comes from the facts of my experience for the past decade where those people well known to me using neuroscience based surveillance technology have been able to read my thoughts (words, sentences and images) and repeat back to me what I am thinking by means of electronic transmission of sound, aka, Voice-to-Skull (V2K) so called by the US Army. I will go one step further and say that thoughts can be made audible in this manner, so that what one thinks in terms of words and sentences come out of a speaker because I hear my thoughts through S2K on a slight delay basis.
Those among the 22 public speakers at the end who reported the same experiences from various parts of the US that I have experienced in London revealed that this exists on a global basis and is being carried out as experiments on non-consensual human subjects as these people repeatedly described while they pleaded for help from the Commission to save their lives.
John Donnelly wrote “But one issue not on the table: whether new technology can help read minds — because it can’t.” This is the language problem. “New technology” is limited to neuroimaging when the Commission did not even consider other areas of neuroscience such as decoding the brain’s electromagnetic radiation emissions. “Science isn’t close to enabling researchers to read the thoughts of others, Farah said in an interview.” continues John Donnelly. Again this is a language usage fallacy. One cannot extrapolate a narrow area of research and application to a broader base.
The Commission has done itself and the public a great disservice by not considering all aspects of neuroscience or even science that might be applicable. I think that the Commission needs to go back to this area and do it justice by a thorough review of the current state of neuroscience that takes in decoding electrical impulses of the brain. What is actually being done is far, far from what is being presented by this Commission so far. This hole needs to be filled in, and those who speak from the public listened to very carefully. They are at the forefront of abuse by research.
Reply
4.
Derek D. Brodie's Gravatar Derek D. Brodie
March 4, 2011 at 12:24 pm | Permalink
Pesonally if an individual was to actually try to read another individuals mind I believe it would entail this process. Find the vibratory frequency of the tissue of said subjects brain. Then pass that frequency at a low level through said tissue. Being received on the other side of said subjects head the frequency could then be analyzed for distortion due to electrical field functioning in brain processes. If the electrical field of the brain can be mapped. Then an individuals brain can be read by the fluctuations of said fields. Personal opinion not researched.
Reply
5.
Peter Rosenholm's Gravatar Peter Rosenholm
March 4, 2011 at 5:36 pm | Permalink
Session 3 of Bioethics Commission
http://tinyurl.com/4t67woe
At about 45 minutes into this Session 3 video of the bioethics Commission Lisa Becker asks a question and in Dr. Farah’s response she says subvocal speech recognition is only speech and not mind reading. If knowing a subjects unspoken thoughts is not mind reading then what is mind reading.
I have written on how millimeter wave surveillance that measure heart and breathing rates as well as sweating as being used in concert with V2K/MEDUSA (microwave hearing effect) as being used as a remote lie detector or to enhance remote no-touch-torture using other directed energy weapons. We need to consider emergent and current technology as being components of a weapons system.
Another example might be to stimulate a part of the brain to bring up a memory. Subvocal speech recognition could be used to read the subjects unspoken thought. Similar results might be obtained with brain imaging/FMRI.
No longer can one technology be considered just by its self.
Peter Rosenholm
Reply
6.
Jeff's Gravatar Jeff
March 4, 2011 at 6:13 pm | Permalink
http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/13/4656599-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealed
Reply
7.
jameskdom's Gravatar jameskdom
March 9, 2011 at 3:33 am | Permalink
Neuroscientists are already able to read some basic thoughts, like whether an individual test subject is looking at a picture of a cat or an image with a specific left or right orientation. They can even read pictures that you’re simply imagining in your mind’s eye. Even leaders in the field are shocked by how far we’ve come in our ability to peer into people’s minds. Will brain scans of the future be able to tell if a person is lying or telling the truth? Suggest whether a consumer wants to buy a car? Reveal our secret likes and dislikes, or our hidden prejudices? While we aren’t there yet, these possibilities have dramatic social, legal and ethical implications… http://tinyurl.com/l7z8ry
If you don't know what the white noise is, please check this video, the sound from the hair drier.
The noise itself might be smaller when the V2K perps tries to talk to the victim. And the V2K perp voices seems to be heard much clearly from inside of one's body like around the back of one's ear or through the vibration of one's breathing.
Can you hear the white noise while you experience the V2K? I think that's the key of how the V2K perps accessing one's brain EMF.
