Public awareness of the MIND CONTROL Technologies and experiments on humans and its impact on individuals and society in EUROPE, Sweden.
Only within a small sphere of military / medical classified research and industrial projects are factual knowledge available.
Even less is known and discussed issues concerning the electromagnetic system controlled by artificial intelligence in interaction with the human brain.
Brain-Computer Interaction and Artificial Intelligence technologies for research and / or implementation of which represent entirely new aspects of the problem in the issue of radiation protection, health, safety, privacy, confidentiality and informed consent.
Brain-Computer Interaction in electronic form, working alternately with the influence of a person or a group of people’s opinions, feelings, thoughts, reaction patterns, and memory and behavior.
Research and technological development is done in / moved to countries where legislation, control and public security is minimal or nonexistent.
Not yet published research materials in interdisciplinary brain research and development of computer-brain interface must therefore be attributed to an unknown number of defenseless experimental subjects, many with families whose lives are destroyed in a wild orgy of computer abuse. This is to copy the cognitive behaviors and human perception in the development of physics. Try The items have no options or informed consent, served as on-line research materials on aging.
Look at: http://targeted-individuals-europe.com/index.php
Proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IzHp1rM-Qo andhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IzHp1rM-Qo&feature=player_embedded
Read this link: www.capurro.de/ECLSC2010.ppt
Unofficial agreements and channels for sharing of research established between countries in the cartels.
In order to initiate a public debate, monitoring and impact analysis of the subject requires international cooperation over a number of topic levels.
Legislation applicable confidentiality and privacy is totally absent in this area.
This happens in Sweden now! A number of people living in Stockholm, SWEDEN, EUROPE have brains been “hijacked” the last three years.
A computer-assisted online connection has been made on objects brains.
Nano-implants have been injected without the consent of the subjects, when visiting the Hospital. After injection, the objects linked to the research computers.
Software for the development of synthetic telepathy has been going around the clock starting after hospital visits.
Look at :
“My effort is to bring man back to his natural self. I will be
???,. Every religion, every tradition, every
morality, every ethical code is going to ??? me. That does not
surprise me! I expect it, because what I say makes a change?
This page contains reciprocal links to relevant websites that inform or support the ETICA project. It also contains links to publications that are of interest to as well as inform the ETICA project.
Can You Live Forever? Maybe Not–But You Can Have Fun Trying
In this chapter from his new e-book, journalist Carl Zimmer tries to reconcile the visions of techno-immortalists with the exigencies imposed by real-world biology
By Carl Zimmer | December 22, 2010 |
International Society for Ethics and Information Technology (INSEIT)
Markkula Centre for Applied Ethics (Markkula Center)
Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics (Oxford Uehiro
Australian Association for Professional and Applied Ethics (AAPAE)
3TU.Centre for Ethics and Technology (3TU)
Centre for the International Study of Cyberethics and Human Rights (CISCHR)
Cardiff Centre for Ethics, Law and Society (CCELS)
Center for Ethics and Law in Biomedicine (CELAB)
Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society (TILT)
Centre for Applied Philosophy, Politics and Ethics (CAPPE)
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (Nuffield Council)
Global Ethics Observatory (GEObs)
University of Tartu Centre for Ethics
Institute for Science, Ethics and Innovation (iSEI)
Centre for Social Ethics and Policy (CSEP)
European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA)
Promoting International Debate on Ethical Implications of Data collection, use and retention for Biometric and Medical Applications (ETICAL
Language Technologies for Lifelong Learning (LTfLL)
Mobility, Data Mining and Privacy (MODAP
Living in Surveillance Socieites (LiSS)
Researching inequality through science and technology (ResIST)
European information and documentation system for ethics and science (ETHICSWEB
extending Professional Active Life (ePAL)
Homeland Security, Biometric Identification & Personal Detection Ethics (HIDE
Rising Pan European & International Awareness of Biometrics & Security Ethics (RISE
Privacy and Emerging Sciences and Technologies (PRESCIENT
Ethical Frameworks FOR Telecare Technologies (EFORTT
If you are interested in establishing a reciprocal link, please contact the project coordinator: bstahl @ dmu.ac.uk
Artificial Hippocampus, the Borg Hive Mind, and Other Neurological Endeavors
by Gregor Wolbring
November 15 , 2006
Many of us know about ‘Borg Hive Mind’ from TV programs where the characters are linked through brain-to-brain or computer-to-brain interactions. However, this is more than a science fiction fantasy. The idea was contemplated seriously in the 2002 National Science Foundation report, Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. ‘Techlepathy‘ is the word coined, referring to the communication of information directly from one mind to another (i.e. telepathy) with the assistance of technology.
Many research activities focus on neuro-engineering and the cognitive sciences. Many neuroscientists and bioengineers now work on:
- cognitive computing
- digitally mapping the human brain (see here and here); the mouse brain map has just been published
- developing microcircuits that can repair brain damage, and
- other numerous projects related to changing the cognitive abilities and functioning of humans, and artificial intelligence.
Journals exist for all of these activities — including the Human Brain Mappingjournal. Some envision a Human Cognome Project. James Albus, a senior fellow and founder of the Intelligent Systems Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology believes the era of ‘engineering the mind‘ is here. He has proposed a national program for developing a scientific theory of the mind.
Neuromorphic engineering, Wikipedia says, “is a new interdisciplinary discipline that takes inspiration from biology, physics, mathematics, computer science and engineering to design artificial neural systems, such as vision systems, head-eye systems, auditory processors, and autonomous robots, whose physical architecture and design principles are based on those of biological nervous systems.”
There are many examples.
Researchers from Harvard University have linked nanowire field-effect transistors to neurons. Three applications are envisioned: hybrid biological/electronic devices, interfaces to neural prosthetics, and the capture of high-resolution information about electrical signals in the brain. Research is advancing in four areas: neuronal networks, interfaces between the brain and external neural prosthetics, real-time cellular assays, and hybrid circuits that couple digital nanoelectronic and biological computing components.
Numenta, a company formed in 2005, states on its webpage that it “is developing a new type of computer memory system modelled after the human neocortex.”
Kwabena Boahen, an associate professor of bioengineering at Stanford University, has developed Neurogrid, “a specialized hardware platform that will enable the cortex’s inner workings to be simulated in detail — something outside the reach of even the fastest supercomputers.” He is also working on a silicon retina and a silicon chip that emulates the way the juvenile brain wires itself up.
Researchers at the University of Washington are working on an implantable electronic chip that may help to establish new nerve connections in the part of the brain that controls movement.
The Blue Brain project — a collaboration of IBM and the Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, in Lausanne, Switzerland – will create a detailed model of the circuitry in the neocortex.
A DNA switch ‘nanoactuator‘ has been developed by Dr. Keith Firman at the University of Portsmouth and other European researchers, which can interface living organisms with computers.
Kevin Warwick had an RFID transmitter (a future column will deal with RFID chips) implanted beneath his skin in 1998, which allowed him to control doors, lights, heaters, and other computer-controlled devices in his proximity. In anotherexperiment, he and his wife Irena each had electrodes surgically implanted in their arms. The electrodes were linked by radio signals to a computer which created a direct link between their nervous systems. Kevin’s wife felt when he moved his arm.
In his book I, Cyborg, Kevin Warwick imagines that 50 years from now most human brains will be linked electronically through a global computer network.
St. Joseph’s Hospital in the United States has implanted neurostimulators (deep brain stimulators) using nanowires to connect a stimulating device to brain. A pacemaker-like device is implanted in the chest, and flexible wires are implanted in the brain. Electrical impulses sent from the ‘pacemaker’ to the brain are used to treat Parkinson’s, migraine headaches and chronic pain, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, improve the mobility of stroke victims, and curb cravings in drug addicts.
In 2003/2004 a variety of publications (see links below) reported on the efforts of professor Theodore W. Berger, director of the Center for Neural Engineering at the University of Southern California, and his colleagues, to develop the world’s firstbrain prosthesis — an ‘artificial hippocampus’ which is supposed to act as a memory bank. These publications highlighted in particular the use of such implants for Alzheimer’s patients.
The research program is proceeding in four stages: (1) tests on slices of rat brains kept alive in cerebrospinal fluid… reported as successful in 2004; (2) tests on live rats which are to take place within three years; (3) tests on live monkeys; and (4) tests on humans — very likely on Alzheimer’s patients first.
The Choice is Yours !
If these advancements come to pass, they will create many ethical, legal, privacy and social issues. For the artificial hippocampus we should ask: would brain implants force some people to remember things they would rather forget? Could someone manipulate our memory? What would be the consequence of uploading information (see my education column)? Will we still have control over what we remember? Could we be forced to remember something over and over? If we can communicate with each other through a computer what will be the consequence of a Global Brain?
It is important that people become more involved in the governance of neuro-engineering and cognitive science projects. We should not neglect these areas because we perceive them to be science fiction. We also need to look beyond the outlined ‘medical applications.’ If the artificial hippocampus works, it will likely be used for more than dealing with diseases.
I will cover brain-machine interfaces, neuro-pharmaceutical-based ‘cognitive enhancement,’ and neuroethics and the ethics of artificial intelligence in future columns.
Gregor Wolbring is a biochemist, bioethicist, science and technology ethicist, disability/vari-ability studies scholar, and health policy and science and technology studies researcher at the University of Calgary. He is a member of the Center for Nanotechnology and Society at Arizona State University; Member CAC/ISO – Canadian Advisory Committees for the International Organization for Standardization section TC229 Nanotechnologies; Member of the editorial team for the Nanotechnology for Developmentportal of the Development Gateway Foundation; Chair of the Bioethics Taskforce of Disabled People’s International; and Member of the Executive of the Canadian Commission for UNESCO. He publishes the Bioethics, Culture and Disability website, moderates a weblog forthe International Network for Social Research on Diasbility, and authors a weblogon NBICS and its social implications.
- “World’s first brain prosthesis revealed.” Duncan Graham-Rowe. New Scientist. March 12, 2003.
- “Scientists develop ‘brain chip.’” BBC News.
- “This is your brain on a microchip.“ Stefanie Olsen. C/NET News. May 11, 2006.
- “Artificial brain parts on the horizon.” TWEAN News 14. May 30, 2006.
- Theodore Berger. University of Southern California.
- Center for Network Neuroscience, University of North Texas.
- “Blueprinting the human brain.” Stefanie Olsen. C/NET News.
- “This is your brain online.” Philip E. Ross. IEEE Spectrum.
- Allan Brain Atlas. Neuroscience Gateway/Nature.
- Bio-X-Bugle. Stanford University.
- The Blue Brain Project. Brain Mind Institute.
- “Chips coming to a brain near you.” Lakshmi Sandhana. Wired News.
- Human Brain Mapping. Wiley InterScience.
- “Getting nanowires on the brain.” Liz Kalaugher. Nanotechweb. August 31, 2006.
- “Couples’ nervous system linked by implants in limbs.” Simon Collins. June 7, 2004.The New Zealand Herald.
- “Brain prosthesis passes live tissue test.” Helen Phillips. New Scientist.
- “Doctor’s specialty is re-wiring brain.” Peggy Peck. CNN. March 22, 2006.
- Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. St. Joseph’s Hospital, St. Paul, Minnesota.
- Press release: FDA Approves Cyberonics’ VNS Therapy System for Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD). Cyberonics, Inc.
- “F.D.A. considers implant device for depression.” Benedict Carey. May 21, 2005. The New York Times.
The End of Death: ‘Soul Catcher’ Computer Chip Due…Source: The Electronic Telegraph (England)
By Robert Uhlig : (From CNI News)
A computer chip implanted behind the eye that could record a person’s every lifetime thought and sensation is to be developed by British scientists.
“This is the end of death,” said Dr. Chris Winter, of British Telecom’s artificial life team. He predicted that within three decades it would be possible to relive other people’s lives by playing back their experiences on a computer. “By combining this information with a record of the person’s genes, we could recreate a person physically, emotionally and spiritually.”
Dr. Winter’s team of eight scientists at BT’s Martlesham Heath Laboratories near Ipswich calls the chip the ‘Soul Catcher.’ It would be possible to imbue a new-born baby with a lifetime’s experiences by giving him or her the Soul Catcher chip of a dead person, Dr. Winter said. The proposal to digitize existence is based on a solid calculation of how much data the brain copes with over a lifetime.
Ian Pearson , BT’s official futurologist, has measured the flow of impulses from the optical nerve and nerves in the skin, tongue, ear, and nose. Over an eighty year life, we process 10 terrabytes of data, equivalent to the storage capacity of 7,142,857,142,860,000 floppy disks.
-Microcircuits The Interface between Neurons and Global Brain Function-
Dr. Pearson said, “If current trends in the miniaturization of computer memory continues at the rate of the past 20 years – a factor of 100 every decade – today’s 8-megabyte memory chip norm will be able to store 10 terrabytes in 15 years.”
British Telecom would not divulge how much money it is investing in the project, but Dr. Winter said it was taking ‘Soul Catcher 2025′ very seriously. He admitted that there were profound ethical considerations, but emphasized that BT was embarking on this line of research to enable it to remain at the forefront of communications technology.
“An implanted chip would be like an aircraft’s black box and would enhance communications beyond current concepts,” he said. “For example, police would be able to use it to relive an attack, rape, or murder from the victim’s viewpoint to help catch the criminal.”
Other applications would be less useful but more frightening. “I could even play back the smells, sounds, and sights of my holiday to my friends,” Dr. Winter said.
News Type: — Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:25 PM EDT
In a single hop scenario, information is captured by satellite and relayed directly to a ground station. Thus, four transmissions are required for a round trip.
In a centralized relay scenario, information is captured by satellite and forwarded to a second satellite in range of a ground station. Six transmissions are required at minimum .
Trilateration is employed to accurately define the location of a signal source. Employed by GPS, the reverse process can be used to isolate the location of signals emanating from the surface of the Earth.
Collated diagram representing electrical activity emanating from a single individual.
A side-on view for demonstration purposes. Each peak represents the amplitude of a specific frequency which is indicative of current activity.
The last article in this series caused quite a stir around the Internet. From the legitimate crazies to the classic muddy-the-water tactics employed by various defense departments, the article has drawn attention right across the globe. For those that have been living under a rock, the last article in this series demonstrated that action potentials (firing neurons) produce detectable radio signals in the SLF/ELF bands (1-1000Hz).
These radio signals can be used to reveal the thoughts, feelings, vision, spacial reasoning and unconscious activity of the brain. It is simply a matter of correlating the patterns received with those produced by the various neural networks to decode the activity. I am deliberately avoiding the term demodulate as no information is modulated onto the radio waves.
One question that keeps popping up is the mechanics of the capture and analysis of these radio signals. How do we go from an SLF/ELF radio wave, with limited bandwidth, to usable information or input that an A.I. can process?
Let’s find out.
Obeying The Speed Limit
The first major issue we encounter is at what altitude can we place our orbiting satellites? This is a relatively easy thing to approximate. The speed of light, in a vacuum, is constant. It travels at 299,792,458 m/s or nearly 300,000 Km/s and somewhat slower depending on the medium it transverses. Whilst at a glance it would seem that you can place the satellites anywhere you like, there is a practical limit given the need for two-way communication with the human brain.
Whilst it may seem to us that we experience the world as it is happening there is, in fact, a small delay. This can be anywhere from 100-200ms. To be of any use, an A.I. needs to be able to analyze information almost as fast as a human can perceive it. That is, for the A.I. to appear to be “in your head”, like a form of Schizophrenia, it must leverage the window provided by the 100-200ms delay. Thus, a round trip, including processing, must be under 200ms for the illusion to be maintained, a maximum of 100ms in either direction. As such, defined limits are imposed upon any solution.
If we examine our first diagram, we can observe a direct relay solution. That is, information captured by the satellite is relayed to a ground station directly. In this scenario, we have four transmissions to complete a round trip to the target. Thus, without considering processing, we know that each transmission can be at maximum 50ms. This gives us a maximum altitude of 14,989.62Km for our satellites which is well below GPS satellites at 20,200Km.
If we now take into consideration processing time, hops between dedicated hardware, lag and atmospheric issues, we could safely approximate 50-80ms. This now reduces our maximum altitude to around 10,000Km.
We cannot always guarantee that our satellite will be in direct line of sight contact with a ground station. In this scenario, we need to relay our information to a satellite that is within transmitting range. This scenario is demonstrated in the second diagram to the right. As a result, our altitude could drop to around 6,000Km or less.
Our constellation is not hindered by line-of-sight requirements of Microwaves as SLF/ELF waves can pass through relatively deep rock and water without a corresponding drop off in signal strength. Thus, a significant drop in altitude would not effect the coverage to any great extent and 30-60 satellites could provide global coverage.
Such a system need only generate around 0.00000002079 Watts, at ground level on the right frequency, to trigger the firing of a neuron. Thus, the SLF/ELF transmitters do not need to be of classical large sizes allowing for dense, power efficient, transmitter arrays in a form factor suitable for satellite deployment. Just keep in mind that an antenna’s function is to increase the amplitude of a wave through electrical resonance. With such small amplitudes, the classical submarine transmitters of 50Km or more are not required. In this form factor, a very rough estimate of a few thousand small antennas, per satellite, is feasible.
So, we have a good approximation of the infrastructure required and the limits that physics imposes. What we need to analyze now is the processing of that information.
Input, Input, Input
If we examine the third diagram, we can obtain a basic idea of the “snapshot” each satellite captures. In a given time frame, a range of frequencies is detected. To isolate a particular person, we use a form of trilateration similar to how GPS functions (see forth diagram). In this case, the Digital Signal Processing equipment on the ground replaces the function of the GPS receiver. Given the nature of SLF/ELF waves, atomic timing and detailed information on satellite drift and atmospheric conditions, millimeter or greater resolution can be achieved. The margin of error in GPS is related to both the lack of a wide range of information and processing power at the GPS receiver.
Once we have determined our desired location, we can collate the frequencies emanating from that particular location and disregard the rest of the information. This provides us with a reduced FFT diagram which represents the electrical activity of a particular individual. We can observe this collated diagram in the fifth image to the right.
From here, it is matter of correlating peaks and patterns against known neural activity. This acts as our translator or lexicon to decode the electrical activity into meaningful information. This is shown in the sixth diagram to the right. Performed in near real-time, every activity, thought, feeling, sight or sound can be captured and recorded.
So, we have shown how signal analysis can be used to infer the activity, both physical and mental, of a targeted individual. It also shows that there is not a giant leap in returning such signals to the brain and effectively hijacking it. Once the frequencies the target’s brain emanates have been isolated, an entire stage of processing (trilateration) can be skipped, unless real-time tracking is required.
Of course, certain architecture choices can provide additional features applicable to intelligence gathering. The first is the storage and analysis of historical information. This allows the A.I. to refer to elements in your past, even though it was not specifically examining you at the time. This can be used to increase the Schizophrenic illusion by inferring that the voice, or personality, was always there. Further to this, an individual not aware of the presence of this system, could have their opinions and feelings manipulated. This is especially useful when a certain political outcome is desired, such as peace negotiations or trade decisions.
A second design choice and arguably the most useful, is a modification on keyword analysis. “Key Thought Analysis” reviews all data in a particular grid search (for example a province in Afghanistan) to reveal individuals thinking of specific activity. Once located, the spacial resolution can be widened to reveal individuals in their presence and whether this was a group planning an attack.
Finally, we could have two or more layers of satellites, one used for real-time interaction with an A.I. and a second set simply gathering information. The latter could be at any altitude.
Magnus Olsson (SWEDEN)
Mail : firstname.lastname@example.org
Journal of Cognitive Liberties
Center for Cognitive Liberties and Ethics
The Mind Has No Firewall”
Parameters, spring 1998, pp. 84-92.
Timothy L. Thomas
The Politics and Costs of Postmodern War in the Age of Bush II
Douglas Kellner, UCLA
“Quiet Transformation: The Role of the Office of Net Assessment”
National Defense University
National War College, CDR Debra O’Maddrell 48
Therapeutic Application of repetitive Tran cranial magnetic stimulation: A Review
Eric M. Wasserman and Sarah H. Lasanby
Magnetic Stimulation: An Introduction”
by Grant Balfour
Military Academy West Point,
An anti-trauma network of implants, intended to maximise the chances of survival when the body is damaged. Small shunts can cut of blood loss and release protecting chemicals, as well as act as a pacemaker for the heart and lungs. If everything else is lost, the implant can douse the brain in neuroprotectants and lower body temperature to slow down damage so that an emergency cryonic suspension can be done.
Likely the most common implants on Nova. Small sensors implanted in the body provides information on the health state which can be used to detect and diagnose illnesses at an early stage. Simple systems just give some chemical information, body data and a rough picture of activity in different organ systems. More advanced monitors are finely spread, detecting minute local changes and comparing the body’s reactions against medical models.
How long shall attempt to sacrifice their families and work have to fight for their human rights in the frenzy of abuse that is now underway on software developed for mapping the brain.
This development is a threat to democracy and much more.
DARPAS Humanoid POLICE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLbla1IJ6oc&feature=share
Immortality only 20 years away says scientist
Scientist Ray Kurzweil claims humans could become immortal in as little as 20 years’ time through nanotechnology and an increased understanding of how the body works.’
Read more,,, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/6217676/Immortality-only-20-years-away-says-scientist.html
HAVE you ever thought about something you never shared with anyone, and have been horror-struck at the mere thought of someone coming to know about your little secret? If you have, then you probably have all the more reason to be paranoid now thanks to new and improved security systems being developed around the world to deal with terrorism that inadvertently end up impinging on one’s privacy.
Some of the countries involved in such programmes include USA, UK, Spain, Germany and France. Recently, the National Security Agency (NSA) of the US has developed a very efficient method of controlling the human brain. This technology is called Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and is expected to revolutionise crime detection and investigation.
What is it? RNM works remotely to control the brain in order to read and detect any criminal thought taking place inside the mind of a possible perpetrator. Research studies have shown that the human brain thinks at a rate of about 5000 bits per second and does not have the capacity to compete with supercomputers performing via satellites, implants and biotelemetry. The human brain has a distinctive set of bioelectric resonance system. For the RNM system, supercomputers are being used and, thus, with its help, supercomputers can send messages through an implanted person’s nervous system in order to influence their performance in a desired way.
RNM has been developed after about 50 years of neuro-electromagnetic involuntary human experimentations. According to many scientists, within a few years it is expected that DNA microchips will be implanted in the human brain which would make it inherently controllable. With RNM, it will be possible to read and control a person’s emotional thought processes along with the subconscious and dreams. At present, around the world, supercomputers are monitoring millions of people simultaneously with the speed of 20 billion bits per second especially in countries like USA, Japan, Israel and many European countries.
RNM has a set of certain programs functioning at different levels, like the signals intelligence system which uses electromagnetic frequencies (EMF), to stimulate the brain for RNM and the electronic brain link (EBL). The EMF Brain Stimulation system has been designed as radiation intelligence which means receiving information from inadvertently originated electromagnetic waves in the environment. However, it is not related to radioactivity or nuclear detonation. The recording machines in the signals intelligence system have electronic equipment that investigate electrical activity in humans from a distance. This computer-generated brain mapping can constantly monitor all electrical activities in the brain. The recording aid system decodes individual brain maps for security purposes.
What does it do?? For purposes of electronic evaluation, electrical activity in the speech centre of the brain can be translated in to the subject’s verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the auditory cortex of the brain directly bypassing the ear. This encoding helps in detecting audio communication. It can also perform electrical mapping of the brain’s activity from the visual centre of the brain, which it does by bypassing the eyes and optic nerves, thus projecting images from the subject’s brain onto a video monitor. With this visual and audio memory, both can be visualised and analysed. This system can, remotely and non-invasively, detect information by digitally decoding the evoked potentials in 30-50Hz, 5 millwatt electromagnetic emissions from the brain. The nerves produce a shifting electrical pattern with a shifting magnetic flux which then puts on a constant amount of electromagnetic waves. There are spikes and patterns which are called evoked potentials in the electromagnetic emission from the brain. The interesting part about this is that the entire exercise is carried out without any physical contact with the subject.
The EMF emissions from the brain can be decoded into current thoughts, images and sounds in the subject’s brain. It sends complicated codes and electromagnetic pulse signals to activate evoked potentials inside the brain, thus generating sounds and visual images in the neural circuits. With its speech, auditory and visual communication systems, RNM allows for a complete audio-visual brain to brain link or a brain-to-computer link.
Of course, the mechanism needs to decode the resonance frequency of each specific site to modulate the insertion of information in that specific location of the brain. RNM can also detect hearing via electromagnetic microwaves, and it also features the transmission of specific commands into the subconscious, producing visual disturbances, visual hallucinations and injection of words and numbers in to the brain through electromagnetic radiation waves. Also, it manipulates emotions and thoughts and reads thoughts remotely, causes pain to any nerve of the body, allows for remote manipulation of behaviour, controls sleep patterns through which control over communication is made easy. This can be used for crime investigation and security management.
Concers ,,,With all the given benefits of RNM for tracking the illicit and treacherous activities, there are many concerns and risks being pointed out by human rights activists and other scientists. The agencies of human rights around the world have criticised RNM as a violation of basic human rights because it violates privacy and the dignity of thoughts and activities of life. Several countries have protested against it and refer to it as an attack on their human and civil rights. The scientists protesting against the use of RNM believe that people who have been implanted involuntarily become biological robots and guinea pigs for RNM activities in the guise of security. This is an important biological concern related to microchip implantation, which is a hidden technology using microwave radiations for the control of the mind.
Research & Progress of computer chips in the brain!
With computer chips in the brain: Who am I?
Of Susanna Radovic from F & F 2009. I remain the same person ony a part of my brain is replaced by a computer chip?
If it were possible, would you have to implant a computer chip in the brain that helped you to remember better? Or to concentrate long periods at a time, or smoothing any mood swings?
Today you can improve and modify the damaged cognitive and mental ability of medical means. But scientists are also on track to develop “brain prosthesis”, that is, artificial implants that can take over a damaged brain function. If Alzheimer’s disease has damaged the part of the brain that is responsible for storage of new memories, would simply be able to replace it with a prosthesis, a computer chip that works on the same principle as the brain itself and that can communicate with the brain’s nerve cells. Similar procedures could also replace other parts of the brain with artificial prostheses.
The development of new methods in medical research raises many ethical problems. Such is the case also with brain implants. But chip in the brain raises other philosophical questions, those related to the ego nature, personal identity, consciousness and free will.
When replacing a part of my brain with an implant will I become a different person? Or rather a robot? Will I be aware that I have a partial artificial brain, or I turn into a zombie? What happens to my free will – can I control my prosthesis or denture, which will govern me?
Research on brain prosthetics have been going on for decades. As early as 1964 placed Jose Delgado, neuroscientists at Yale University in U.S., Electrodes in the heads of both animals and humans with spectacular results. Before a stunned audience got Delgado, by simply pressing a button, a bull to stop an attack and calmly turn back. In his hand he had a remote that was connected to the electrodes inside the head of the bull, and a signal to the bull’s brain Delgado could get it to stop.
Could the same technology could be used to control people’s behavior? Is it possible to get a man to do anything against her own will by stimulating the brain in this way? Delgado performed similar experiments on humans, and when asked teach one subject in the laboratory Delgado as saying: “I suppose, Doctor, that your electricity is stronger than my will.”
Brain Implants for MIND CONTROL!
There could be conflict between the personal freedom to use one‘s economic resources to get an implant that will enhance one‘s physical capabilities and what society at large considers desirable or ethically acceptable.“
How threatening for mankind is an Artificial Brain ?
First let me state that at this moment the biggest threat for mankind is the human specie ! ABC-weapons in wrong hands can result in extreme damaging behavior.
25-04-2010. MINDTECH seeks to establish a network of laymen and media. This group will be dealing with the social and ethical sides to research, development and the implementation of emerging technologies in our society.
Meanwhile, philosophers working alongside the researchers say it’s time to find out more about how the public feels about such bionic research, which in some cases is being used to enhance human memory, physical abilities and perception.“
MindUploading.org addresses the specific issues that may arise when neural prostheses are customized to a specific patient, and when large scale neural prostheses lead to whole brain emulation: the emulation of a patient’s complete brain function in a prosthetic substrate. Site content is focused on neuroscience and computational research that is involved in an eventual progression from neural prostheses to the applied science of whole brain emulation, including the concept of “mind-transfer”.
Implant chip in the human brain.Synthetic telepathy is communication systems built on thoughts, not speech. Multimedia communication network is based. Brain copying is performed around the clock, largely by learning computer, copying is nothing short of serious torture. No one would voluntarily give informed consent to this serious research abuse. It takes years of learning and program development to develop the new computer-brain interfaces and multimedia language between man and computer. Subjects are now against their will has been online for five years on Man-Brain-Computer-Interface.
Read E.U -commisioner Professor Rafael Capuros presentation.
The age of pharmaceutical microchipping is now upon us. Novartis AG, one of the largest drug companies in the world, has announced a plan to begin embedding microchips in medications to create “smart pill” technology.
The microchip technology is being licensed from Proteus Biomedical of Redwood City, California. Once activated by stomach acid, the embedded microchip begins sensing its environment and broadcasting data to a receiver warn by the patient. This receiver is also a transmitter that can send the data over the internet to a doctor.
The idea behind all this is to create “smart pills” that can sense what’s happening in the body and deliver that information to the patient’s doctor. Novartis plans to start microchipping its organ transplant anti-rejection drugs and then potentially expand microchipping to otherpharmaceuticals in its product lineup. This same technology could soon end up in pills made by other drug companies, too.
The best laid plans…
News: See us at the first public workshop on Advancing Substrate Independent Minds (ASIM-2010), August 16-17, organized by carboncopies.org, satellite to the Singularity Summit in San Francisco.
The Oxford Whole Brain Emulation workshop
(the resulting Roadmap)
Whole Brain Emulation at the Singularity Summit 2009
(slides to Dr. Randal A. Koene’s talk, also see Anders Sandberg, David Chalmers and Robin Hanson)
Whole Brain Emulation at AGI-10
Whole Brain Emulation at the Terasem workshop
What you can do:
- Educate yourself further by visiting our information-packed Mind Control Information Center.
- Learn more about the intriguing history and development of controversial mind control programs in this excellent two-page summary. Footnotes and links to reliable sources are provided for verification purposes.
- For reliable, verifiable information from major media articles on the little-known, yet critical topic of nonlethal weapons, click here and here.
- Read powerful, reliable major media articles on electronic harassment and government mind control programs at this link.
- Inform your media and political representatives of this critical information. Contact those close to you at this link. Urge them to bring this information to light and encourage public dialog on this important civil rights issue.
- Spread this news to your friends and colleagues, and bookmark this article on key news websites using the “Share This” icon on this page, so that we can fill the role at which the major media is sadly failing. Together, we can make a difference.
Meanwhile, philosophers working alongside the researchers say it’s time to find out more about how the public feels about such bionic research, which in some cases is being used to enhance human memory, physical abilities and perception.
“There’s a recognition that this technology does shape the world in which people live.”
Tending to civilize human experimentation (HE) intentionally disregards law and ethics. Are existing laws providing sufficient defense against experiments done without consent? What chance does a person stand in the court of law when making a case against the government, industry and military for illegal experimentation? And to make the matter worse, how does a victim take legal action when statements or proofs are non-admissible as testimony in a court of law.
Ingrid Larssen 4 January, 2010
I have a very interesting story to tell regarding science/technology and a night visit/science experiment performed (without consent) why – its a long story. Said individual came to Agencies attention when contacted Anti-Terrorist Hotline and descovered her wistleblowing was of great interest to them. They descended (Agencies) for 18 mths and said individuals life was turned upside down. Why – contact me & I’ll tell you. Feeling used, abused and trampled on. The covert operation left said individual alone at sea and uninformed. I have a lot to get off me chest – contact me a give me a chance to tell my story, only you will need a very open mind.
At first sight ICT implants are ethically unproblematic if we think for instance about cardiac pacemakers. However, although particular ICT implants may be used to repair deficient bodily capabilities, others are ethically more problematic, particularly if such devices are accessible via digital networks. ICT implants, due to their network capability could be misused in several ways for all kinds of social surveillance or manipulation.
The idea of placing ICT devices “under our skin” in order not just to repair but even to enhance human capabilities gives rise to science fiction visions with threat and/or benefit characteristics. However, in some cases, the implantation of microchips with the potential for individual and social forms of control is already taking place.
Thank you for quoting from my article “Human experimentation for the sake of technological progress?!”
For those who are interested please read the rest of the article here:
Best Regards, Gina Rydland, Freelance journalist
May 5th 2010
Tending to civilize human experimentation (HE) intentionally disregards law and ethics. Are existing laws providing sufficient defense against experiments done without consent? What chance does a person stand in the court of law when making a case against the government, industry and military for illegal experimentation? And to make the matter worse, how does a victim take legal action when statements or proofs are non-admissible as testimony in a court of law.
The link to “Human experimentation for the sake of technological progress?!”
I stumbled onto your site, and think you did an fantastic job. I am very motivated as a Ti and human rights activist. There is power in numbers and making contact and coordinating with others in our situation is important. I have a Web sitehttp://www.unwittingvictim.com In my case I am very grounded, with a stable foundation, although the perpetrators are short circuiting my short term memory and stopping my free ability to think. I am in communication with other well grounded group leaders in the US on a daily basis. We could possibly combine our efforts on a project that we find mutually beneficial and motivating. We need to ensure we follow through with any of our efforts, while combining our individual efforts to form a stronger and more powerful whole. We are all adversely affected, mind bending is the only word that I can think of that conveys what our, the Ti community’s, knowledge base suffers through. We need join forces to ensure we are a force to be reckoned with on a project of our choosing. We would be a group of Ti’s who have awareness foundation, understand the gravity of the harm and hardship, are well grounded, and are motivated.
Are you aware of Intel’s brain chip within 10 years for the consumer. http://www.unwittingvictim.com/Intel.html
Standing together for human rights,
With this increase in connectivity of brain to chip and chip to brain comes increased assimilation and learning time. After implantation (still an outpatient procedure) it will take 30 to 90 days of neuron growth around the chip for it and the brain to become fully integrated. Upon chip integration, the newly chipped person will need to attend nine months of intensive classroom based courses, where they are taught new ways to think, process thoughts, and to categorize memories and data.
Miracle technology could allow people to transmit their brainwaves and speak to each other mind-to-mind. Scientists are working to create computers that read thoughts to find terrorists, and machines to scan our minds like thumbprints–causing some to wonder if “thought theft” could become the crime of the future.
So what exactly am I talking about here? Simply put, it is the ability to use a small computer to feed information directly to the brain. This is now the stuff of science fiction, but according to the people doing the research, not all that difficult do accomplish. The end result is seen as a nano-computer, implanted under the skin somewhere on the body. This computer would be wirelessly updated and able to wirelessly transmit information to nano-implants in the brain. Eventually you could have all the information in the world available to your brain. Everyone could in theory, know everything.
Hej Magnu Olsson SWEDEN;
Det otroliga, det snabbserverande uttrycken “Synd, men omöjligt— av högre
komplexitet—Man råkar på dessa reaktioner var man än befinner sig på energiskalorna;
Jag bör om någon kunna känna dragen hos de reaktioner i människan som spontant a l l t i d förnekar
existensen av det psykiatrin gett namn, symtom (vilken bredd!) o s v
Men här hara vi ett slag av problem som är f ö r mediaintressant för att bara vinkas bort.
Sålunda: 1. Media kan göra goda affärer på att med full kraft ta spets på avslöjanden om hur
Hjärnornas krig pågår bakom Lyckta dörrar som en tredimensionell Kafka och Moment 22.
En normalanpassad individ har icke en chans i detta myller av dementier, nyheter utan adress, hätska hatkrig i professurernas
normaltillstånd om stora nya framsteg uppdagas;
Och att vinna Hjärnornas krig är en utopisk tanke, forskarna får ofta bakläxa på de bataljer
man genomstridit utan att ha fokus på resultat.
En reaktion som är enutmaning till alla dessa ^NANO- och övriga disciplinner där articifiell människa
O m det skulle vara mpöjligt att inplantera mottagare och sändare samt efterhärma våra hjärnors innersta koder -
ja, skulle det då inte vara fullt rimligt – ja, snarast ett ANSVAR från samhällets sida! – att a) lindra de plågor de utsatta
mänskliga “experimentmössen” dagligen, ja stundligen dygnet runt i ett evighetshjul, b) Skulle dessa i och för sig
starka individer – som orkar stå ut, hur nu än plågan har för grogrund – inte kunna bringas till ett drägligt medverkande i reell
forskning oc där målet är attt stoppa “störningarna” samt jaga bort det som utan försökspersonens godkännande pågår.
Men politik är vanskligt.
Jag föreslår att krafter som kan vinna gehör i det svenska valet denna sensommar—-att man letar fram kanaler så att Hjärnornas krig kommer i
rampljuset i Sverige.
Där finner vi “allt”; Ny tekniks spitzenkraft-Centrum.. S Thorwald Olsson
blogg http://thorwaldscomeback.blogspot.com FIGUR: THORWALD oLSSONS BOKMÄRKE – SKAPAT 2010. hJÄRNORNAS KRIG, DEL 1.
Indeed, most of the technology involved is exactly identical to that of cell-phone technology. Satellites link the sender and the receiver. A computer “multiplexer” routes the voice signal of the sender through microwave towers to a very specifically defined location or cell. The “receiver” is located and tracked with pinpoint accuracy, to within a few feet of actual location. But the receiver is not a cell phone. It’s a human brain.
Frågan om vari personlig identitet egentligen består har länge diskuterats av filosofer. Personlig identitet är enligt de flesta inte avhängig av den fysiska kroppen. Många skulle nog hålla med om att jag är samma person som jag var för 20 år sedan, trots att jag inte ser likadan ut och att så gott som alla celler i min kropp är utbytta. Det är nog heller ingen som skulle vilja hävda att man inte längre är samma person för att man har en benprotes i stället för sitt medfödda ben eller för att man har förändrat sitt utseende med plastikoperationer. Men var går gränsen? Kan man byta ut sin hjärna mot en protes?
Jag tror att röster, tanketerror, filmer i huvet, migrän, epilepsi och muskelryckningar och konstiga hjärtklappningar alla kommer med tankeöverföring. Med enkelt språk det är tankestrålning som överför detta. Så om man startar ett elektromagnetiskt fält med t.ex en kopparprocessor (finns i gamecube) med ett program eller en sorts modul som gör ett bra fält då kan man ta bort alla dessa symptom och få rikare klarare tankeförmåga och mer vivid bättre minne och mer gjädje och lyxigare egna känslor. Men ibörjan kan man inte prata så bra men ens tanke är lätt att förstå.
Jag tror också man kan blockera det som sänds ut från huvet (nanoradiovågor) och då stängs mindcontrol av och man får aldrig hicka eller huvudvärk.
The future may well involve the reality of science fiction’s cyborg, persons who have developed some intimate and occasionally necessary relationship with a machine. It is likely that implantable computer chips acting as sensors, or actuators, may soon assist not only failing memory, but even bestow fluency in a new language, or enable “recognition” of previously unmet individuals. The progress already made in therapeutic devices, in prosthetics, and Brain in computer science indicate that it may well be feasible to develop direct interfaces between the brain and computers